Luke continues the arrest-and-defense section of Acts, showing Paul before the Sanhedrin, then under Roman protection after a murder plot is discovered.
Text Size
Acts 23
The Lord Stands Near Paul and Preserves His Witness
Acts 23 shows that no council conflict, murder plot, or political confusion can overturn the Lord’s promise that Paul must testify in Rome.
Reading a chapter
What this page is: Each chapter page shows the big idea, the argument flow, key original-language terms, doctrine connections, and passage units, all in one place.
How to use it: Start with the Overview tab to get the chapter's main point. Then move to Passages to study individual units, or Language to trace key terms.
Going deeper: The Doctrines and Motifs tabs show how this chapter connects to the broader biblical story.
Chapter Summary
Acts 23 shows that no council conflict, murder plot, or political confusion can overturn the Lord’s promise that Paul must testify in Rome.
Overview
Acts 23 argues that the risen Lord governs Paul’s witness even through chaos, injustice, and conspiracy. Paul’s central issue is the hope of resurrection, which divides the council and clarifies the gospel’s theological center. The Lord then personally assures Paul that His Jerusalem testimony will continue in Rome. A murder plot arises immediately, but providence exposes it through Paul’s nephew and Roman military protection.
Context
Theophilus and the wider church are being shown that Paul’s custody is not mission failure. The Lord Himself confirms Paul’s future witness in Rome, and providence preserves Paul through ordinary human means.
Acts 23 begins in Jerusalem before the Sanhedrin. After the council erupts in dispute, Paul is returned to the Roman barracks. The Lord appears to Him that night. The next day, more than forty men form a murder conspiracy, but Paul’s nephew discovers the plot. The Roman commander sends Paul by night under heavy guard to Caesarea with a letter to Governor Felix.
Acts 23 shows that no council conflict, murder plot, or political confusion can overturn the Lord’s promise that Paul must testify in Rome.
Luke continues the arrest-and-defense section of Acts, showing Paul before the Sanhedrin, then under Roman protection after a murder plot is discovered.
Theophilus and the wider church are being shown that Paul’s custody is not mission failure. The Lord Himself confirms Paul’s future witness in Rome, and providence preserves Paul through ordinary human means.
Acts 23 begins in Jerusalem before the Sanhedrin. After the council erupts in dispute, Paul is returned to the Roman barracks. The Lord appears to Him that night. The next day, more than forty men form a murder conspiracy, but Paul’s nephew discovers the plot. The Roman commander sends Paul by night under heavy guard to Caesarea with a letter to Governor Felix.
Social Pressure
- Paul faces unjust treatment from the high priest, council hostility, sectarian conflict between Pharisees and Sadducees, a sworn assassination plot, and continued imprisonment. Roman authority again becomes the means by which His life is preserved.
The Sanhedrin includes both Sadducees and Pharisees. Sadducees deny resurrection, angels, and spirits, while Pharisees affirm them. Paul’s statement about the hope of resurrection exposes a deep theological divide in the council. Roman military protocol then moves Paul from Jerusalem to Caesarea under escort because of a credible threat to His life.
Acts 23 is a decisive turning point. The Lord tells Paul that as He has testified in Jerusalem, He must also testify in Rome. From here forward, Paul’s chains become the pathway by which the gospel witness moves toward the capital of the empire.
Chapter Movement
Paul testifies before the Sanhedrin, exposes the resurrection issue, receives the Lord’s promise of witness in Rome, escapes a murder plot through providential disclosure, and is transferred under Roman protection to Caesarea.
Discourse Insight
Theological exposition and fulfillment
Acts 23 clarifies the gospel by identifying Paul’s trial with the hope of resurrection. The gospel is not detached spirituality; it announces resurrection hope fulfilled in Christ and carried forward through witness. The risen Lord Himself stands near Paul and ensures that the testimony will continue to Rome.
Structural Flow
Paul claims a good conscience before God, is unjustly struck, and responds with both rebuke and scriptural submission.
Paul identifies the resurrection as the true theological issue, causing division between Pharisees and Sadducees.
The Lord stands near Paul, commands courage, and promises that He must testify in Rome.
A sworn conspiracy seeks Paul’s death before Rome can happen.
Paul’s nephew learns of the plot and reports it to the Roman commander.
Paul is moved by night under heavy guard to Caesarea, where Felix will hear the case.
Chapter Outline
- 1: Paul begins before the Sanhedrin by declaring that He has lived before God in good conscience.
- 2: Ananias commands those near Paul to strike Him on the mouth.
- 3: Paul condemns the hypocrisy of being judged by the law while being unlawfully struck.
- 4-5: When told He has spoken against the high priest, Paul cites Scripture concerning rulers of the people.
- 6: Paul declares that He is on trial because of the hope of the resurrection of the dead.
- 7-9: Pharisees and Sadducees argue sharply over resurrection, angels, and spirits.
- 10: As the dispute becomes violent, the commander orders soldiers to remove Paul for His safety.
- 11: The Lord stands near Paul and tells Him He must testify in Rome as He has testified in Jerusalem.
- 12-15: More than forty men vow not to eat or drink until they have killed Paul and seek cooperation from the leaders.
- 16-22: Paul’s nephew learns of the ambush, tells Paul, and is brought to the commander with the information.
- 23-24: The commander orders soldiers, horsemen, and spearmen to take Paul safely to Felix.
- 25-30: The commander explains the case, presents Paul as a Roman citizen, and states that the charges do not deserve death or imprisonment.
- 31-35: Paul is taken by night to Antipatris and then to Caesarea, where Felix keeps Him under guard in Herod’s palace.
Theological Argument
Acts 23 argues that the risen Lord governs Paul’s witness even through chaos, injustice, and conspiracy. Paul’s central issue is the hope of resurrection, which divides the council and clarifies the gospel’s theological center. The Lord then personally assures Paul that His Jerusalem testimony will continue in Rome. A murder plot arises immediately, but providence exposes it through Paul’s nephew and Roman military protection.
- 1.Paul begins by claiming a good conscience before God, framing his defense as accountability to God above human accusation.
- 2.Ananias’s command to strike Paul reveals the injustice of judging by the law while violating the law.
- 3.Paul’s rebuke exposes religious hypocrisy, yet his citation of Scripture shows he remains under the authority of God’s word.
- 4.Paul identifies the real theological issue as the resurrection hope.
- 5.The resurrection divides the Sanhedrin because Sadducees deny what Pharisees affirm.
- 6.The Pharisees’ partial defense of Paul shows that his message cannot be reduced to lawlessness or anti-Jewish rebellion.
- 7.The commander’s intervention again preserves Paul’s life through Roman authority.
- 8.The Lord’s appearance in verse 11 is the theological center of the chapter: Paul’s future is governed by Christ’s necessity, not human plots.
- 9.The command to take courage answers the fear and uncertainty of Paul’s imprisonment.
- 10.The phrase 'you must also testify in Rome' establishes divine necessity for Paul’s onward mission.
- 11.The murder conspiracy is therefore not merely a threat against Paul but an attempt that cannot defeat Christ’s stated purpose.
- 12.The oath-bound conspirators show zeal twisted into lawless violence.
- 13.Paul’s nephew becomes an ordinary providential instrument of deliverance.
- 14.Paul uses proper channels, sending the young man to the commander through a centurion.
- 15.The commander acts decisively because Paul’s Roman citizenship and public order require protection.
- 16.The heavy escort demonstrates the seriousness of the threat and the strength of providential preservation.
- 17.Claudius Lysias’s letter unintentionally supports Paul’s innocence by admitting the dispute concerns Jewish law and not a capital crime.
- 18.Paul’s transfer to Caesarea moves him away from the immediate Jerusalem threat and toward testimony before governors and eventually Rome.
- 19.The chapter closes with Paul still in custody, but custody has become the road of mission.
Theological Focus
- Good conscience before God
- Injustice under religious authority
- Submission to Scripture
- The hope of resurrection
- Pharisee and Sadducee division
- The Lord’s nearness to His servant
- Courage under imprisonment
- Divine necessity of witness in Rome
- Human conspiracy against divine mission
- Providence through family members
- Providence through Roman authority
- Legal protection of witness
- Paul’s innocence concerning capital crimes
- The gospel advancing through custody
- Resurrection Hope
- The Lord’s Nearness
- Divine Necessity of Witness
- Providence
- Good Conscience Before God
- Scripture Authority
- False Zeal and Violence
- Lawful Protection of Witness
- Innocence Before Civil Law
Covenant Significance
Acts 23 frames Paul’s controversy as centered on the hope of resurrection, the hope rooted in Israel’s Scriptures and fulfilled in Christ. Paul is not abandoning Israel’s hope; He is testifying to its resurrection fulfillment. The council’s division reveals that the gospel presses Israel’s own theological questions to their climax in Jesus.
Old Testament Connections
- Paul’s claim of good conscience shows His ministry remains accountable to Israel’s God.
- His appeal to Scripture regarding rulers shows continued submission to God’s word.
- The resurrection hope is presented as the true issue behind Paul’s trial.
- The Pharisees’ openness to angel or spirit speech leaves room for Paul’s claim of heavenly revelation.
- The Sadducean denial of resurrection exposes a fundamental theological conflict.
- The Lord’s promise of Rome extends Israel’s resurrection witness to the Gentile imperial center.
- Paul’s preservation through Roman custody moves the covenant witness from Jerusalem toward the nations.
- Paul’s citation about not speaking evil of a ruler comes from the law.
- The resurrection hope rests on Old Testament expectation of God raising the dead and vindicating His people.
- Good conscience before God reflects covenantal accountability to the Lord.
- The Lord standing near Paul recalls biblical patterns of divine presence strengthening servants under threat.
- The failure of violent plots against God’s servant reflects the biblical theme that human schemes cannot overturn divine purpose.
Canonical Connections
Paul’s defense rests on the resurrection hope central to apostolic preaching.
The Lord stands near Paul as God often strengthens servants under threat.
Paul’s preservation advances Jesus’ promise that His servants will testify before authorities.
Human conspiracies against God’s servants appear throughout Scripture but cannot overthrow God’s purpose.
Paul’s Roman protection continues the Acts pattern of legal means preserving witness.
Paul’s conscience before God becomes a recurring theme in His defense.
Cross References
Clarifies how the passage points to the gospel of Christ.
Now if Christ is preached, that he has been raised from the dead, how do some among you say that there is no resurrection of the dead? But if there is no resurrection of the dead, neither has Christ been raised. If Christ has not been...
Clarifies how the passage points to the gospel of Christ.
having a good conscience. Thus, while you are spoken against as evildoers, they may be disappointed who curse your good way of life in Christ.
Clarifies how the passage points to the gospel of Christ.
But the Lord stood by me and strengthened me, that through me the message might be fully proclaimed, and that all the Gentiles might hear. So I was delivered out of the mouth of the lion.
Clarifies how the passage points to the gospel of Christ.
The Lord said to Paul in the night by a vision, “Don’t be afraid, but speak and don’t be silent; for I am with you, and no one will attack you to harm you, for I have many people in this city.”
Clarifies how the passage points to the gospel of Christ.
having hope toward God, which these also themselves look for, that there will be a resurrection of the dead, both of the just and unjust.
Clarifies how the passage points to the gospel of Christ.
In this I also practice always having a conscience void of offense toward God and men.
Clarifies how the passage points to the gospel of Christ.
Now I stand here to be judged for the hope of the promise made by God to our fathers, which our twelve tribes, earnestly serving night and day, hope to attain. Concerning this hope I am accused by the Jews, King Agrippa! Why is it judged...
Clarifies how the passage points to the gospel of Christ.
For there stood by me this night an angel, belonging to the God whose I am and whom I serve, saying, ‘Don’t be afraid, Paul. You must stand before Caesar. Behold, God has granted you all those who sail with you.’
Clarifies how the passage points to the gospel of Christ.
saying, ‘Don’t be afraid, Paul. You must stand before Caesar. Behold, God has granted you all those who sail with you.’
Clarifies how the passage points to the gospel of Christ.
But the Lord said to him, “Go your way, for he is my chosen vessel to bear my name before the nations and kings, and the children of Israel.
Clarifies how the passage points to the gospel of Christ.
Jesus said to her, “I am the resurrection and the life. He who believes in me will still live, even if he dies.
Clarifies how the passage points to the gospel of Christ.
When he had said this, one of the officers standing by slapped Jesus with his hand, saying, “Do you answer the high priest like that?” Jesus answered him, “If I have spoken evil, testify of the evil; but if well, why do you beat me?”
Clarifies how the passage points to the gospel of Christ.
“Woe to you, scribes and Pharisees, hypocrites! For you are like whitened tombs, which outwardly appear beautiful, but inwardly are full of dead men’s bones, and of all uncleanness.
Clarifies how the passage points to the gospel of Christ.
teaching them to observe all things that I commanded you. Behold, I am with you always, even to the end of the age.” Amen.
Clarifies how the passage points to the gospel of Christ.
Now I desire to have you know, brothers, that the things which happened to me have turned out rather to the progress of the Good News,
Clarifies how the passage points to the gospel of Christ.
We know that all things work together for good for those who love God, for those who are called according to his purpose.
Shows Old Testament grounding that frames or supports this passage.
Many of those who sleep in the dust of the earth will awake, some to everlasting life, and some to shame and everlasting contempt.
Shows Old Testament grounding that frames or supports this passage.
“You shall not blaspheme God, nor curse a ruler of your people.
Shows Old Testament grounding that frames or supports this passage.
Don’t you be afraid, for I am with you. Don’t be dismayed, for I am your God. I will strengthen you. Yes, I will help you. Yes, I will uphold you with the right hand of my righteousness.
Shows Old Testament grounding that frames or supports this passage.
But as for me, I know that my Redeemer lives. In the end, he will stand upon the earth. After my skin is destroyed, then I will see God in my flesh, whom I, even I, will see on my side. My eyes will see, and not as a stranger. “My heart is...
Shows Old Testament grounding that frames or supports this passage.
“ ‘You shall do no injustice in judgment. You shall not be partial to the poor, nor show favoritism to the great; but you shall judge your neighbor in righteousness.
Shows Old Testament grounding that frames or supports this passage.
The king’s heart is in Yahweh’s hand like the watercourses. He turns it wherever he desires.
Shows Old Testament grounding that frames or supports this passage.
Shows Old Testament grounding that frames or supports this passage.
Provides immediate literary context around the same argument flow.
They listened to him until he said that; then they lifted up their voice and said, “Rid the earth of this fellow, for he isn’t fit to live!” As they cried out, threw off their cloaks, and threw dust into the air, the commanding officer...
Provides immediate literary context around the same argument flow.
But on the next day, desiring to know the truth about why he was accused by the Jews, he freed him from the bonds, and commanded the chief priests and all the council to come together, and brought Paul down and set him before them. Paul,...
Provides immediate literary context around the same argument flow.
The following night, the Lord stood by him and said, “Cheer up, Paul, for as you have testified about me at Jerusalem, so you must testify also at Rome.”
Provides immediate literary context around the same argument flow.
The following night, the Lord stood by him and said, “Cheer up, Paul, for as you have testified about me at Jerusalem, so you must testify also at Rome.” When it was day, some of the Jews banded together, and bound themselves under a...
Provides immediate literary context around the same argument flow.
He called to himself two of the centurions, and said, “Prepare two hundred soldiers to go as far as Caesarea, with seventy horsemen, and two hundred men armed with spears, at the third hour of the night.” He asked them to provide animals,...
Provides immediate literary context around the same argument flow.
But when Paul perceived that the one part were Sadducees and the other Pharisees, he cried out in the council, “Men and brothers, I am a Pharisee, a son of Pharisees. Concerning the hope and resurrection of the dead I am being judged!”...
Gospel Clarity
Acts 23 clarifies the gospel by identifying Paul’s trial with the hope of resurrection. The gospel is not detached spirituality; it announces resurrection hope fulfilled in Christ and carried forward through witness. The risen Lord Himself stands near Paul and ensures that the testimony will continue to Rome.
Gospel Guardrails
- Paul’s defense centers on the hope of the resurrection.
- The resurrection divides belief from denial.
- The Lord Jesus is living and personally near to His servant.
- The Lord commands courage.
- Paul’s testimony in Jerusalem is affirmed by Christ.
- Paul must testify in Rome by divine necessity.
- Human plots cannot cancel Christ’s mission.
- God preserves gospel witness through providential means.
- Roman custody becomes the pathway for continued testimony.
- Do not sideline resurrection as a secondary doctrine.
- Do not treat Christ as absent when His servants suffer.
- Do not interpret opposition as proof that witness has failed.
- Do not confuse zeal with obedience when zeal produces violence.
- Do not despise ordinary providence because it lacks spectacle.
- Do not treat lawful protection as unbelief when it preserves witness.
Gospel Cross References
Now if Christ is preached, that he has been raised from the dead, how do some among you say that there is no resurrection of the dead? But if there is no resurrection of the dead, neither has Christ been raised. If Christ has not been...
having a good conscience. Thus, while you are spoken against as evildoers, they may be disappointed who curse your good way of life in Christ.
But the Lord stood by me and strengthened me, that through me the message might be fully proclaimed, and that all the Gentiles might hear. So I was delivered out of the mouth of the lion.
The Lord said to Paul in the night by a vision, “Don’t be afraid, but speak and don’t be silent; for I am with you, and no one will attack you to harm you, for I have many people in this city.”
having hope toward God, which these also themselves look for, that there will be a resurrection of the dead, both of the just and unjust.
In this I also practice always having a conscience void of offense toward God and men.
Now I stand here to be judged for the hope of the promise made by God to our fathers, which our twelve tribes, earnestly serving night and day, hope to attain. Concerning this hope I am accused by the Jews, King Agrippa! Why is it judged...
For there stood by me this night an angel, belonging to the God whose I am and whom I serve, saying, ‘Don’t be afraid, Paul. You must stand before Caesar. Behold, God has granted you all those who sail with you.’
saying, ‘Don’t be afraid, Paul. You must stand before Caesar. Behold, God has granted you all those who sail with you.’
But the Lord said to him, “Go your way, for he is my chosen vessel to bear my name before the nations and kings, and the children of Israel.
Jesus said to her, “I am the resurrection and the life. He who believes in me will still live, even if he dies.
When he had said this, one of the officers standing by slapped Jesus with his hand, saying, “Do you answer the high priest like that?” Jesus answered him, “If I have spoken evil, testify of the evil; but if well, why do you beat me?”
“Woe to you, scribes and Pharisees, hypocrites! For you are like whitened tombs, which outwardly appear beautiful, but inwardly are full of dead men’s bones, and of all uncleanness.
teaching them to observe all things that I commanded you. Behold, I am with you always, even to the end of the age.” Amen.
Now I desire to have you know, brothers, that the things which happened to me have turned out rather to the progress of the Good News,
We know that all things work together for good for those who love God, for those who are called according to his purpose.
Primary Emphasis
Acts 23 presents the risen Lord as personally near to Paul, sovereign over His future, and determined that Paul’s testimony will reach Rome. Jesus is not absent while Paul is imprisoned; He stands near, commands courage, and governs the mission path.
Chapter Contribution
Acts 23 argues that the risen Lord governs Paul’s witness even through chaos, injustice, and conspiracy. Paul’s central issue is the hope of resurrection, which divides the council and clarifies the gospel’s theological center. The Lord then personally assures Paul that His Jerusalem testimony will continue in Rome. A murder plot arises immediately, but providence exposes it through Paul’s nephew and Roman military protection.
Doctrines in This Chapter
Jesus directs the geographical advance of witness.
Believers answer first to God’s judgment rather than human approval.
Divine assurance strengthens endurance.
God orchestrates events to fulfill His redemptive purposes.
Truth divides where error denies core revelation.
Christian faith centers on victory over death.
Paul’s conduct reflects steadfast moral clarity under accusation.
Governing officials function within God’s sovereign framework.
God’s purposes prevail despite violent opposition.
Family ties and civic authority serve divine protection.
God preserves Paul amid internal religious conflict.
Authority can act unjustly while claiming fidelity to the law.
Scripture commands restraint in speech toward rulers.
Future resurrection is foundational to biblical hope.
Legal proceedings become platforms for testimony.
Doctrinal Weight
Paul declares that He is on trial because of the hope of the resurrection of the dead.
The Lord stands near Paul and commands Him to take courage.
The Lord says Paul must testify in Rome.
God preserves Paul through His nephew, Roman officers, and a military transfer.
Paul claims to have fulfilled His duty to God in good conscience.
Paul cites Scripture concerning speech about rulers.
More than forty men bind themselves under oath to murder Paul.
Roman authority preserves Paul from mob violence and assassination.
Claudius Lysias reports that Paul is accused over Jewish law but not guilty of a crime deserving death or imprisonment.
Reading Lenses
Theological exposition and fulfillment
- Acts 23 clarifies the gospel by identifying Paul’s trial with the hope of resurrection. The gospel is not detached spirituality; it announces resurrection hope fulfilled in Christ and carried forward through witness. The risen Lord Himself stands near Paul and ensures that the testimony will continue to Rome.
Key Greek Terms
Form in passage Dative · Singular · Neuter What is this?
Sense Council, Sanhedrin
Definition Paul stands before the Jewish council.
References Acts 23:1, 6, 15, 20, 28
Lexicon Council, Sanhedrin
Why it matters The gospel witness is now before formal Jewish authority.
Form in passage Dative · Singular · Feminine What is this?
Sense Conscience, moral awareness
Definition Paul says he has lived before God in good conscience.
References Acts 23:1
Lexicon Conscience, moral awareness
Why it matters Paul’s defense begins with integrity before God.
Sense High priest, chief priest
Definition Ananias the high priest orders Paul struck.
References Acts 23:2, 4
Lexicon High priest, chief priest
Why it matters The scene exposes corrupt use of religious authority.
Form in passage Present · Active · Infinitive What is this?
Sense Strike, beat
Definition Paul is ordered struck on the mouth.
References Acts 23:2
Lexicon Strike, beat
Why it matters The unlawful blow reveals injustice in the court.
Form in passage Perfect · Passive · Participle · Singular What is this?
Sense Whitewash, plaster over
Definition Paul calls Ananias a whitewashed wall.
References Acts 23:3
Lexicon Whitewash, plaster over
Why it matters The image names hypocrisy hidden under religious appearance.
Form in passage Accusative · Singular · Masculine What is this?
Sense Law
Definition Paul says Ananias judges by the law while violating the law.
References Acts 23:3
Lexicon Law
Why it matters True judgment must submit to God’s law rather than merely invoke it.
Form in passage Nominative · Singular · Masculine What is this?
Sense Pharisee
Definition Paul identifies himself as a Pharisee and son of Pharisees.
References Acts 23:6
Lexicon Pharisee
Why it matters Paul connects His trial to resurrection hope shared by Pharisaic doctrine.
Cross-language bridge 1 link · View in lexicon
Form in passage Genitive · Singular · Feminine What is this?
Sense Hope, confident expectation
Definition Paul is on trial concerning the hope of resurrection.
References Acts 23:6
Lexicon Hope, confident expectation
Why it matters Christian witness is grounded in God’s resurrection promise.
Cross-language bridge 1 link · View in lexicon
Form in passage Genitive · Singular · Feminine What is this?
Sense Resurrection, rising from the dead
Definition Paul identifies resurrection as the issue of his trial.
References Acts 23:6, 8
Lexicon Resurrection, rising from the dead
Why it matters Resurrection is central to apostolic gospel hope.
Form in passage Genitive · Plural · Masculine What is this?
Sense Sadducees
Definition Sadducees deny resurrection, angels, and spirits.
References Acts 23:7-8
Lexicon Sadducees
Why it matters Their denial creates the council division and exposes theological conflict.
Form in passage Accusative · Singular · Masculine What is this?
Sense Angel, messenger
Definition Sadducees deny angels; Pharisees raise the possibility that one spoke to Paul.
References Acts 23:8-9
Lexicon Angel, messenger
Why it matters The council divides over supernatural revelation categories.
Sense Spirit
Definition Sadducees deny spirits while Pharisees affirm them.
References Acts 23:8-9
Lexicon Spirit
Why it matters The debate concerns unseen spiritual realities tied to Paul’s testimony.
Sense Take courage, be confident
Definition The Lord commands Paul to take courage.
References Acts 23:11
Lexicon Take courage, be confident
Why it matters Courage is grounded in Christ’s presence and promise.
Form in passage Aorist · Middle · Indicative · 2nd Person · Singular What is this?
Sense Testify solemnly, bear witness
Definition The Lord says Paul testified about him in Jerusalem and must testify in Rome.
References Acts 23:11
Lexicon Testify solemnly, bear witness
Why it matters Paul’s ministry in chains is defined as witness to Christ.
Sense It is necessary, must
Definition The Lord says Paul must testify in Rome.
References Acts 23:11
Lexicon It is necessary, must
Why it matters Rome is not optional; it is divinely necessary within Christ’s mission.
Form in passage Accusative · Singular · Feminine What is this?
Sense Rome
Definition The Lord names Rome as Paul’s future place of testimony.
References Acts 23:11
Lexicon Rome
Why it matters The gospel witness is moving toward the empire’s center.
Form in passage Accusative · Singular · Feminine What is this?
Sense Conspiracy, plot, unlawful gathering
Definition Some Jews form a conspiracy to kill Paul.
References Acts 23:12
Lexicon Conspiracy, plot, unlawful gathering
Why it matters Human schemes threaten Paul but cannot overrule the Lord’s promise.
Form in passage Aorist · Active · Indicative · 3rd Person · Plural What is this?
Sense Bind under curse, place under oath
Definition The conspirators bind themselves not to eat or drink until Paul is killed.
References Acts 23:12, 14, 21
Lexicon Bind under curse, place under oath
Why it matters Their religious oath intensifies the evil of their murderous zeal.
Form in passage Aorist · Active · Subjunctive · 3rd Person · Plural What is this?
Sense Kill, put to death
Definition The conspirators intend to kill Paul.
References Acts 23:12, 14, 15, 21
Lexicon Kill, put to death
Why it matters Violent opposition continues, but Paul’s life is under Christ’s mission promise.
Form in passage Accusative · Singular · Feminine What is this?
Sense Ambush, trap
Definition The conspirators prepare an ambush for Paul.
References Acts 23:16
Lexicon Ambush, trap
Why it matters The plot depends on deceit, but providence exposes it.
Form in passage Accusative · Singular · Masculine What is this?
Sense Commander, tribune
Definition The Roman commander receives the report and transfers Paul.
References Acts 23:17-22
Lexicon Commander, tribune
Why it matters He is a providential means of preserving Paul’s witness.
Form in passage Accusative · Plural · Masculine What is this?
Sense Soldiers
Definition The commander orders soldiers to escort Paul.
References Acts 23:23
Lexicon Soldiers
Why it matters Roman military force protects Paul from assassination.
Sense Bring safely through, rescue, preserve
Definition The commander orders Paul taken safely to Felix.
References Acts 23:24
Lexicon Bring safely through, rescue, preserve
Why it matters Paul’s preservation is the narrative result of Christ’s promise and providence.
Form in passage Accusative · Singular · Masculine What is this?
Sense Governor, ruler
Definition Paul is sent to Governor Felix.
References Acts 23:24, 26, 33
Lexicon Governor, ruler
Why it matters Paul’s testimony moves into Roman provincial authority.
Form in passage Accusative · Singular · Neuter What is this?
Sense Accusation, charge
Definition The commander says the charge concerns Jewish law.
References Acts 23:29
Lexicon Accusation, charge
Why it matters Paul is not shown guilty of a Roman capital crime.
Sense Death
Definition The commander says Paul is not accused of anything deserving death.
References Acts 23:29
Lexicon Death
Why it matters Roman assessment repeatedly supports Paul’s legal innocence.
Sense Chains, bonds, imprisonment
Definition The commander says the charge does not deserve imprisonment.
References Acts 23:29
Lexicon Chains, bonds, imprisonment
Why it matters Paul’s custody is protective and procedural rather than evidence of guilt.
Sense Province
Definition Felix asks what province Paul is from.
References Acts 23:34
Lexicon Province
Why it matters Paul’s case now proceeds through Roman jurisdiction.
Lexicon data: MorphGNT Strong's Dictionary XML (CC0) · Open Scriptures Hebrew Bible (CC BY 4.0) · Open Scriptures Hebrew Lexicon (CC BY 4.0) · STEPBible Data (CC BY 4.0) · Full details
Discourse Connectives (46)
grounds / explanation 5inference / conclusion 5purpose clause 1conditional clause 1content marker or causal 7continuation or mild contrast 22contrast setup (μέν...δέ) 4additive / emphatic 1
| v.1 | δὲthencontinuation or mild contrastNote where δέ appears in a μέν...δέ pair — that structure is a deliberate contrast. |
| v.2 | δὲThencontinuation or mild contrastNote where δέ appears in a μέν...δέ pair — that structure is a deliberate contrast. |
| v.4 | δὲnowcontinuation or mild contrastNote where δέ appears in a μέν...δέ pair — that structure is a deliberate contrast. |
| v.5 | ὅτιthatcontent marker or causalIf ὅτι follows a verb of speaking/knowing/believing, it introduces content. If it follows a statement, it introduces a reason.γὰρforgrounds / explanationAsk: what claim is this 'for' grounding? That claim is the main point.ὅτιthatcontent marker or causalIf ὅτι follows a verb of speaking/knowing/believing, it introduces content. If it follows a statement, it introduces a reason. |
| v.6 | δὲthencontinuation or mild contrastNote where δέ appears in a μέν...δέ pair — that structure is a deliberate contrast.ὅτιthatcontent marker or causalIf ὅτι follows a verb of speaking/knowing/believing, it introduces content. If it follows a statement, it introduces a reason.δὲbutcontinuation or mild contrastNote where δέ appears in a μέν...δέ pair — that structure is a deliberate contrast. |
| v.7 | δὲthencontinuation or mild contrastNote where δέ appears in a μέν...δέ pair — that structure is a deliberate contrast. |
| v.8 | μὲνindeedcontrast setup (μέν...δέ)The μέν...δέ pair is a rhetorical hinge. Both sides matter equally.γὰρforgrounds / explanationAsk: what claim is this 'for' grounding? That claim is the main point.δὲhowevercontinuation or mild contrastNote where δέ appears in a μέν...δέ pair — that structure is a deliberate contrast. |
| v.9 | δὲthencontinuation or mild contrastNote where δέ appears in a μέν...δέ pair — that structure is a deliberate contrast.εἰWhat ifconditional clauseAsk whether Paul treats the 'if' as assumed true (1st class) or merely hypothetical.δὲnowcontinuation or mild contrastNote where δέ appears in a μέν...δέ pair — that structure is a deliberate contrast. |
| v.10 | δὲthencontinuation or mild contrastNote where δέ appears in a μέν...δέ pair — that structure is a deliberate contrast. |
| v.11 | δὲButcontinuation or mild contrastNote where δέ appears in a μέν...δέ pair — that structure is a deliberate contrast.γὰρforgrounds / explanationAsk: what claim is this 'for' grounding? That claim is the main point. |
| v.12 | δὲthencontinuation or mild contrastNote where δέ appears in a μέν...δέ pair — that structure is a deliberate contrast. |
| v.13 | δὲnowcontinuation or mild contrastNote where δέ appears in a μέν...δέ pair — that structure is a deliberate contrast. |
| v.15 | οὖνthereforeinference / conclusionAsk: what has Paul argued up to this point? 'Therefore' is the payoff.δὲthencontinuation or mild contrastNote where δέ appears in a μέν...δέ pair — that structure is a deliberate contrast. |
| v.16 | δὲhowevercontinuation or mild contrastNote where δέ appears in a μέν...δέ pair — that structure is a deliberate contrast. |
| v.17 | δὲthencontinuation or mild contrastNote where δέ appears in a μέν...δέ pair — that structure is a deliberate contrast.γὰρforgrounds / explanationAsk: what claim is this 'for' grounding? That claim is the main point. |
| v.18 | μὲνindeedcontrast setup (μέν...δέ)The μέν...δέ pair is a rhetorical hinge. Both sides matter equally.οὖνthereforeinference / conclusionAsk: what has Paul argued up to this point? 'Therefore' is the payoff. |
| v.19 | δὲthencontinuation or mild contrastNote where δέ appears in a μέν...δέ pair — that structure is a deliberate contrast. |
| v.20 | δὲthencontinuation or mild contrastNote where δέ appears in a μέν...δέ pair — that structure is a deliberate contrast.ὅτιthatcontent marker or causalIf ὅτι follows a verb of speaking/knowing/believing, it introduces content. If it follows a statement, it introduces a reason. |
| v.21 | οὖνthereforeinference / conclusionAsk: what has Paul argued up to this point? 'Therefore' is the payoff.γὰρindeedgrounds / explanationAsk: what claim is this 'for' grounding? That claim is the main point. |
| v.22 | μὲνIndeedcontrast setup (μέν...δέ)The μέν...δέ pair is a rhetorical hinge. Both sides matter equally.οὖνthereforeinference / conclusionAsk: what has Paul argued up to this point? 'Therefore' is the payoff.ὅτιthatcontent marker or causalIf ὅτι follows a verb of speaking/knowing/believing, it introduces content. If it follows a statement, it introduces a reason. |
| v.23 | ΚαὶAndadditive / emphaticClause-initial καί in Paul often links equal-weight clauses that should be read together. |
| v.24 | ἵναso thatpurpose clauseἵνα clauses often contain the theological payoff: 'so that God might...' |
| v.27 | ὅτιthatcontent marker or causalIf ὅτι follows a verb of speaking/knowing/believing, it introduces content. If it follows a statement, it introduces a reason. |
| v.29 | δὲhowevercontinuation or mild contrastNote where δέ appears in a μέν...δέ pair — that structure is a deliberate contrast. |
| v.30 | δέthencontinuation or mild contrastNote where δέ appears in a μέν...δέ pair — that structure is a deliberate contrast. |
| v.31 | μὲνIndeedcontrast setup (μέν...δέ)The μέν...δέ pair is a rhetorical hinge. Both sides matter equally.οὖνthereforeinference / conclusionAsk: what has Paul argued up to this point? 'Therefore' is the payoff. |
| v.32 | δὲnowcontinuation or mild contrastNote where δέ appears in a μέν...δέ pair — that structure is a deliberate contrast. |
| v.34 | δὲthencontinuation or mild contrastNote where δέ appears in a μέν...δέ pair — that structure is a deliberate contrast.ὅτιthatcontent marker or causalIf ὅτι follows a verb of speaking/knowing/believing, it introduces content. If it follows a statement, it introduces a reason. |
Discourse data: STEPBible TAGNT (CC BY 4.0)
Verb Aspect (150 main verbs)
completed 30ongoing 13prospective 2resultant 3imperative 4subjunctive 10background 7infinitive 26participle 55
| v.1 | ἀτενίσαςlooking intentlyaorist active participleparticipleParticiple — verbal adjective, supporting actionεἶπενépōsaidaorist active indicativecompletedAorist indicative — punctiliar or completed actionπεπολίτευμαιpoliteúomailived ~ lifeperfect middle indicativeresultantPerfect indicative — completed action with present result |
| v.2 | ἐπέταξενepitássōorderedaorist active indicativecompletedAorist indicative — punctiliar or completed actionπαρεστῶσινparístēmistanding nearperfect active participleparticipleParticiple — verbal adjective, supporting actionτύπτεινtýptōstrikepresent active infinitiveinfinitiveInfinitive — verbal noun or complementary verb |
| v.3 | εἶπενépōsaidaorist active indicativecompletedAorist indicative — punctiliar or completed actionΤύπτεινtýptōstrikepresent active infinitiveinfinitiveInfinitive — verbal noun or complementary verbμέλλειméllōis going topresent active indicativeongoingPresent indicative — ongoing, habitual, or general truthκεκονιαμένεkoniáōwhitewashedperfect passive participleparticipleParticiple — verbal adjective, supporting actionκάθῃkáthēmaisittingpresent middle indicativeongoingPresent indicative — ongoing, habitual, or general truthκρίνωνkrínōjudgepresent active participleparticipleParticiple — verbal adjective, supporting actionπαρανομῶνparanoméōviolation of the lawpresent active participleparticipleParticiple — verbal adjective, supporting actionκελεύειςkeleúōorderpresent active indicativeongoingPresent indicative — ongoing, habitual, or general truthτύπτεσθαιtýptōstruckpresent passive infinitiveinfinitiveInfinitive — verbal noun or complementary verb |
| v.4 | παρεστῶτεςparístēmistanding nearbyperfect active participleparticipleParticiple — verbal adjective, supporting actionεἶπανépōsaidaorist active indicativecompletedAorist indicative — punctiliar or completed actionλοιδορεῖςloidoréōrevilepresent active indicativeongoingPresent indicative — ongoing, habitual, or general truth |
| v.5 | ἔφηphēmísaidimperfect active indicativebackgroundImperfect indicative — continuous or repeated past actionᾔδεινeídōknowpluperfect active indicativeresultantPluperfect — action completed before another past actionγέγραπταιgráphōwrittenperfect passive indicativeresultantPerfect indicative — completed action with present resultἐρεῖςeréōspeakfuture active indicativeprospectiveFuture indicative — anticipated or promised action |
| v.6 | Γνοὺςginṓskōrealizedaorist active participleparticipleParticiple — verbal adjective, supporting actionἔκραζενkrázōcried outimperfect active indicativebackgroundImperfect indicative — continuous or repeated past actionκρίνομαιkrínōjudgedpresent passive indicativeongoingPresent indicative — ongoing, habitual, or general truth |
| v.7 | λαλοῦντοςlaléōhaving saidpresent active participleparticipleParticiple — verbal adjective, supporting actionἐγένετοgínomaibroke outaorist middle indicativecompletedAorist indicative — punctiliar or completed actionἐσχίσθηschízōdividedaorist passive indicativecompletedAorist indicative — punctiliar or completed action |
| v.8 | λέγουσινlégōsaypresent active indicativeongoingPresent indicative — ongoing, habitual, or general truthεἶναιeînaithere ispresent active infinitiveinfinitiveInfinitive — verbal noun or complementary verbὁμολογοῦσινhomologéōacknowledgepresent active indicativeongoingPresent indicative — ongoing, habitual, or general truth |
| v.9 | ἐγένετοgínomaiaroseaorist middle indicativecompletedAorist indicative — punctiliar or completed actionἀναστάντεςstood upaorist active participleparticipleParticiple — verbal adjective, supporting actionδιεμάχοντοdiamáchomaicontended sharplyimperfect middle indicativebackgroundImperfect indicative — continuous or repeated past actionλέγοντεςlégōsayingpresent active participleparticipleParticiple — verbal adjective, supporting actionεὑρίσκομενheurískōfindpresent active indicativeongoingPresent indicative — ongoing, habitual, or general truthἐλάλησενlaléōspokenaorist active indicativecompletedAorist indicative — punctiliar or completed action |
| v.10 | γινομένηςgínomaibecamepresent middle participleparticipleParticiple — verbal adjective, supporting actionφοβηθεὶςphobéōafraidaorist passive participleparticipleParticiple — verbal adjective, supporting actionδιασπασθῇdiaspáōtorn to piecesaorist passive subjunctivesubjunctiveSubjunctive mood — conditional, purpose, or contingentἐκέλευσενkeleúōorderedaorist active indicativecompletedAorist indicative — punctiliar or completed actionκαταβὰνkatabaínōgo downaorist active participleparticipleParticiple — verbal adjective, supporting actionἁρπάσαιtake ~ away ~ byforceaorist active infinitiveinfinitiveInfinitive — verbal noun or complementary verbἄγεινbringpresent active infinitiveinfinitiveInfinitive — verbal noun or complementary verb |
| v.11 | ἐπιούσῃepioûsafollowingpresent active participleparticipleParticiple — verbal adjective, supporting actionἐπιστὰςephístēmistoodaorist active participleparticipleParticiple — verbal adjective, supporting actionεἶπενépōsaidaorist active indicativecompletedAorist indicative — punctiliar or completed actionΘάρσειtharséōtake couragepresent active imperativeimperativeImperative mood — command or exhortationδιεμαρτύρωdiamartýromaitestifiedaorist middle indicativecompletedAorist indicative — punctiliar or completed actionδεῖdéōmustpresent active indicativeongoingPresent indicative — ongoing, habitual, or general truthμαρτυρῆσαιmartyréōtestifyaorist active infinitiveinfinitiveInfinitive — verbal noun or complementary verb |
| v.12 | Γενομένηςgínomaiwasaorist middle participleparticipleParticiple — verbal adjective, supporting actionποιήσαντεςpoiéōformedaorist active participleparticipleParticiple — verbal adjective, supporting actionἀνεθεμάτισανbound ~ undera curseaorist active indicativecompletedAorist indicative — punctiliar or completed actionλέγοντεςlégōsayingpresent active participleparticipleParticiple — verbal adjective, supporting actionἀποκτείνωσινkilledaorist active subjunctivesubjunctiveSubjunctive mood — conditional, purpose, or contingent |
| v.13 | ποιησάμενοιpoiéōformedaorist middle participleparticipleParticiple — verbal adjective, supporting action |
| v.14 | προσελθόντεςprosérchomaiwentaorist active participleparticipleParticiple — verbal adjective, supporting actionεἶπανépōsaidaorist active indicativecompletedAorist indicative — punctiliar or completed actionἀνεθεματίσαμενwe boundaorist active indicativecompletedAorist indicative — punctiliar or completed actionγεύσασθαιgeúomaitasteaorist middle infinitiveinfinitiveInfinitive — verbal noun or complementary verbἀποκτείνωμενkilledaorist active subjunctivesubjunctiveSubjunctive mood — conditional, purpose, or contingent |
| v.15 | ἐμφανίσατεemphanízōnotifyaorist active imperativeimperativeImperative mood — command or exhortationκαταγάγῃkatágōbring ~ downaorist active subjunctivesubjunctiveSubjunctive mood — conditional, purpose, or contingentμέλλονταςméllōwere going topresent active participleparticipleParticiple — verbal adjective, supporting actionδιαγινώσκεινdiaginṓskōdeterminepresent active infinitiveinfinitiveInfinitive — verbal noun or complementary verbἐγγίσαιengízōcomes nearaorist active infinitiveinfinitiveInfinitive — verbal noun or complementary verbἀνελεῖνkillaorist active infinitiveinfinitiveInfinitive — verbal noun or complementary verb |
| v.16 | Ἀκούσαςheardaorist active participleparticipleParticiple — verbal adjective, supporting actionπαραγενόμενοςparagínomaicameaorist middle participleparticipleParticiple — verbal adjective, supporting actionεἰσελθὼνeisérchomaigained entranceaorist active participleparticipleParticiple — verbal adjective, supporting actionἀπήγγειλενtoldaorist active indicativecompletedAorist indicative — punctiliar or completed action |
| v.17 | προσκαλεσάμενοςproskaléomaicalledaorist middle participleparticipleParticiple — verbal adjective, supporting actionἔφηphēmísaidimperfect active indicativebackgroundImperfect indicative — continuous or repeated past actionἄπαγεbringpresent active imperativeimperativeImperative mood — command or exhortationἔχειéchōhaspresent active indicativeongoingPresent indicative — ongoing, habitual, or general truthἀπαγγεῖλαίreportaorist active infinitiveinfinitiveInfinitive — verbal noun or complementary verb |
| v.18 | παραλαβὼνparalambánōtookaorist active participleparticipleParticiple — verbal adjective, supporting actionἤγαγενbroughtaorist active indicativecompletedAorist indicative — punctiliar or completed actionφησίνphēmísaidpresent active indicativeongoingPresent indicative — ongoing, habitual, or general truthπροσκαλεσάμενόςproskaléomaicalledaorist middle participleparticipleParticiple — verbal adjective, supporting actionἠρώτησενerōtáōaskedaorist active indicativecompletedAorist indicative — punctiliar or completed actionἀγαγεῖνbringaorist active infinitiveinfinitiveInfinitive — verbal noun or complementary verbἔχοντάéchōhaspresent active participleparticipleParticiple — verbal adjective, supporting actionλαλῆσαίlaléōtellaorist active infinitiveinfinitiveInfinitive — verbal noun or complementary verb |
| v.19 | ἐπιλαβόμενοςepilambánomaitookaorist middle participleparticipleParticiple — verbal adjective, supporting actionἀναχωρήσαςdrew ~ asideaorist active participleparticipleParticiple — verbal adjective, supporting actionἐπυνθάνετοpynthánomaiaskedimperfect middle indicativebackgroundImperfect indicative — continuous or repeated past actionἔχειςéchōhavepresent active indicativeongoingPresent indicative — ongoing, habitual, or general truthἀπαγγεῖλαίreportaorist active infinitiveinfinitiveInfinitive — verbal noun or complementary verb |
| v.20 | εἶπενépōsaidaorist active indicativecompletedAorist indicative — punctiliar or completed actionσυνέθεντοsyntíthemaiagreedaorist middle indicativecompletedAorist indicative — punctiliar or completed actionἐρωτῆσαίerōtáōaskaorist active infinitiveinfinitiveInfinitive — verbal noun or complementary verbκαταγάγῃςkatágōbring ~ downaorist active subjunctivesubjunctiveSubjunctive mood — conditional, purpose, or contingentμέλλονméllōwere going topresent active participleparticipleParticiple — verbal adjective, supporting actionπυνθάνεσθαιpynthánomaiinquirepresent middle infinitiveinfinitiveInfinitive — verbal noun or complementary verb |
| v.21 | πεισθῇςpeíthōpersuadedaorist passive subjunctivesubjunctiveSubjunctive mood — conditional, purpose, or contingentἐνεδρεύουσινenedreúōlying in ambush forpresent active indicativeongoingPresent indicative — ongoing, habitual, or general truthἀνεθεμάτισανbound ~ byan oathaorist active indicativecompletedAorist indicative — punctiliar or completed actionἀνέλωσινkilledaorist active subjunctivesubjunctiveSubjunctive mood — conditional, purpose, or contingentπροσδεχόμενοιprosdéchomaiwaiting forpresent middle participleparticipleParticiple — verbal adjective, supporting action |
| v.22 | ἀπέλυσεdismissedaorist active indicativecompletedAorist indicative — punctiliar or completed actionπαραγγείλαςparangéllōorderingaorist active participleparticipleParticiple — verbal adjective, supporting actionἐκλαλῆσαιeklaléōtellaorist active infinitiveinfinitiveInfinitive — verbal noun or complementary verbἐνεφάνισαςemphanízōrevealedaorist active indicativecompletedAorist indicative — punctiliar or completed action |
| v.23 | προσκαλεσάμενόςproskaléomaisummonedaorist middle participleparticipleParticiple — verbal adjective, supporting actionεἶπενépōsaidaorist active indicativecompletedAorist indicative — punctiliar or completed actionἙτοιμάσατεhetoimázōget readyaorist active imperativeimperativeImperative mood — command or exhortationπορευθῶσινporeúomaigoaorist passive subjunctivesubjunctiveSubjunctive mood — conditional, purpose, or contingent |
| v.24 | παραστῆσαιparístēmiprovideaorist active infinitiveinfinitiveInfinitive — verbal noun or complementary verbἐπιβιβάσαντεςepibibázōrideaorist active participleparticipleParticiple — verbal adjective, supporting actionδιασώσωσιdiasṓzōbring ~ safelyaorist active subjunctivesubjunctiveSubjunctive mood — conditional, purpose, or contingent |
| v.25 | γράψαςgráphōwroteaorist active participleparticipleParticiple — verbal adjective, supporting actionἔχουσανéchōhadpresent active participleparticipleParticiple — verbal adjective, supporting action |
| v.26 | χαίρεινchaírōgreetingspresent active infinitiveinfinitiveInfinitive — verbal noun or complementary verb |
| v.27 | συλλημφθένταsyllambánōseizedaorist passive participleparticipleParticiple — verbal adjective, supporting actionμέλλονταméllōwas about topresent active participleparticipleParticiple — verbal adjective, supporting actionἀναιρεῖσθαιkilledpresent passive infinitiveinfinitiveInfinitive — verbal noun or complementary verbἐπιστὰςephístēmicameaorist active participleparticipleParticiple — verbal adjective, supporting actionἐξειλάμηνexairéōrescuedaorist middle indicativecompletedAorist indicative — punctiliar or completed actionμαθὼνmanthánōlearnedaorist active participleparticipleParticiple — verbal adjective, supporting action |
| v.28 | βουλόμενόςboúlomaiwantedpresent middle participleparticipleParticiple — verbal adjective, supporting actionἐπιγνῶναιepiginṓskōknowaorist active infinitiveinfinitiveInfinitive — verbal noun or complementary verbἐνεκάλουνenkaléōaccusingimperfect active indicativebackgroundImperfect indicative — continuous or repeated past actionκατήγαγονkatágōbrought ~ downaorist active indicativecompletedAorist indicative — punctiliar or completed action |
| v.29 | εὗρονheurískōfoundaorist active indicativecompletedAorist indicative — punctiliar or completed actionἐγκαλούμενονenkaléōaccusedpresent passive participleparticipleParticiple — verbal adjective, supporting actionἔχονταéchōwaspresent active participleparticipleParticiple — verbal adjective, supporting action |
| v.30 | μηνυθείσηςmēnýōinformedaorist passive participleparticipleParticiple — verbal adjective, supporting actionἔσεσθαιésomaibefuture middle infinitiveinfinitiveInfinitive — verbal noun or complementary verbἔπεμψαpémpōsentaorist active indicativecompletedAorist indicative — punctiliar or completed actionπαραγγείλαςparangéllōorderingaorist active participleparticipleParticiple — verbal adjective, supporting actionλέγεινlégōstatepresent active infinitiveinfinitiveInfinitive — verbal noun or complementary verb |
| v.31 | διατεταγμένονdiatássōordersperfect passive participleparticipleParticiple — verbal adjective, supporting actionἀναλαβόντεςtookaorist active participleparticipleParticiple — verbal adjective, supporting actionἤγαγονbroughtaorist active indicativecompletedAorist indicative — punctiliar or completed action |
| v.32 | ἐάσαντεςeáōletaorist active participleparticipleParticiple — verbal adjective, supporting actionἀπέρχεσθαιgo onpresent middle infinitiveinfinitiveInfinitive — verbal noun or complementary verbὑπέστρεψανhypostréphōreturnedaorist active indicativecompletedAorist indicative — punctiliar or completed action |
| v.33 | εἰσελθόντεςeisérchomaicameaorist active participleparticipleParticiple — verbal adjective, supporting actionἀναδόντεςdeliveredaorist active participleparticipleParticiple — verbal adjective, supporting actionπαρέστησανparístēmipresentedaorist active indicativecompletedAorist indicative — punctiliar or completed action |
| v.34 | ἀναγνοὺςreadaorist active participleparticipleParticiple — verbal adjective, supporting actionἐπερωτήσαςeperōtáōaskedaorist active participleparticipleParticiple — verbal adjective, supporting actionπυθόμενοςpynthánomailearnedaorist middle participleparticipleParticiple — verbal adjective, supporting action |
| v.35 | Διακούσομαίdiakoúomaigive ~ ahearingfuture middle indicativeprospectiveFuture indicative — anticipated or promised actionἔφηphēmísaidimperfect active indicativebackgroundImperfect indicative — continuous or repeated past actionπαραγένωνταιparagínomaiarriveaorist middle subjunctivesubjunctiveSubjunctive mood — conditional, purpose, or contingentκελεύσαςkeleúōorderedaorist active participleparticipleParticiple — verbal adjective, supporting actionφυλάσσεσθαιphylássōkept under guardpresent passive infinitiveinfinitiveInfinitive — verbal noun or complementary verb |
Verb forms indicate aspect — not interpretive weight. Consult context before drawing conclusions about emphasis.
Clause data: MACULA Greek (Clear Bible, CC BY 4.0) · SBLGNT (Logos/SBL, CC BY 4.0)
Word Pictures (Robertson)
A.T. Robertson, Word Pictures in the New Testament (1930–31) — public domain
Formation Focus
Acts 23 teaches that the Lord’s mission cannot be stopped by unjust councils, violent conspiracies, or political confusion because Christ stands near His servant and governs the path of witness.
Believers must learn courage from the Lord’s nearness, keep resurrection hope central, and trust providence even when protection comes through ordinary and unexpected means.
Courage, integrity, resurrection confidence, scriptural restraint, providential trust, patience under custody, and readiness for continued witness.
Practice Response
- Maintain a conscience accountable to God.
- Speak truthfully under unjust treatment.
- Let Scripture govern Your reactions.
- Keep the resurrection at the center of hope and witness.
- Receive courage from the Lord’s nearness.
- Trust Christ’s promises over human threats.
- Report danger wisely through proper channels.
- Use lawful protections for the sake of continued witness.
- Interpret restriction through mission, not despair.
Warnings and Misreadings
- Acts 23 warns against religious authority that violates justice, zeal that becomes murder, and theological systems that deny the resurrection hope. It also warns that human plots cannot overturn the Lord’s mission, though conspirators remain morally responsible for their violence.
- Treating Paul’s appeal to Pharisee identity as mere manipulation, rather than recognizing that the resurrection truly is central to His gospel defense.
- Assuming Paul’s conscience claim means sinless perfection, when the point is integrity before God in His present witness.
- Reading Paul’s rebuke of Ananias as uncontrolled rage while ignoring the real injustice of the high priest’s command.
- Ignoring Paul’s submission to Scripture in verse 5 after His rebuke.
- Treating the Pharisees as full gospel allies, when their defense is partial and based on shared resurrection categories.
- Missing verse 11 as the theological anchor of the chapter.
- Seeing the murder plot as creating suspense over whether Christ’s promise will fail, rather than as a threat already under the Lord’s sovereign promise.
- Overlooking Paul’s nephew as an ordinary but crucial instrument of providence.
- Treating Roman protection as worldly rescue detached from God’s providence.
- Ignoring that official Roman correspondence repeatedly finds no capital crime in Paul.
Discipleship Questions
- Can I honestly say that I am seeking to live before God with a good conscience?
- Do I submit my speech to Scripture even when I am mistreated?
- Is resurrection hope central to how I understand the gospel and Christian courage?
- Where do I need to hear the Lord’s command, 'Take courage'?
- Do I believe Christ’s promise more deeply than I fear human opposition?
- Can I recognize providence when it comes through ordinary people rather than dramatic miracles?
- Am I willing to use proper channels and lawful means without trusting them more than God?
- Do I see limitations and custody as possible platforms for witness?
- What human plot or pressure am I treating as stronger than the Lord’s 'must'?
Pastoral Applications
- Teach Acts 23 as a chapter about Christ’s sovereign preservation of witness, not merely political intrigue.
- Use Paul’s conscience statement to call believers to integrity before God.
- Warn leaders that religious authority must never be used to violate justice.
- Preach the resurrection as the central hope that divides true gospel faith from denial.
- Use the Pharisee-Sadducee conflict to show that doctrinal differences matter.
- Comfort suffering believers with the Lord’s nearness to Paul in the barracks.
- Emphasize that the Lord’s promise does not remove danger but guarantees mission fulfillment.
- Show how God uses ordinary providence: a nephew, a report, a commander, a night escort.
- Encourage wise use of lawful protection when it serves life and gospel witness.
- Prepare the church to see Paul’s transfer to Caesarea as progress toward Rome, not retreat.
Pastoral Trajectories
Paul’s claim of good conscience immediately meets unjust treatment from the high priest.
Paul rebukes hypocrisy but then acknowledges Scripture’s command about rulers.
Paul identifies the deeper theological issue as the resurrection of the dead.
The dispute becomes so dangerous that the commander again removes Paul for protection.
The Lord stands near Paul and declares that He must testify in Rome.
The conspiracy against Paul is discovered by His nephew and brought to the commander.
Paul is transferred under heavy guard to Felix, moving closer to the next stage of testimony.
Motifs in This Chapter
Trace servant identity, obedient mission, and suffering service across Scripture.
Track judgment as covenant accountability, divine justice, and eschatological reckoning.
Study kingdom reign, divine rule, and gospel kingdom proclamation across Scripture.
Trace remnant preservation, covenant continuity, and mercy under judgment across Scripture.
Follow resurrection hope, vindication, and life-over-death patterns across the canon.
The Biblical World
Chapter At A Glance
Paul testifies before the Sanhedrin, exposes the resurrection issue, receives the Lord’s promise of witness in Rome, escapes a murder plot through providential disclosure, and is transferred under Roman protection to Caesarea.
Acts 23 frames Paul’s controversy as centered on the hope of resurrection, the hope rooted in Israel’s Scriptures and fulfilled in Christ. Paul is not abandoning Israel’s hope; He is testifying to its resurrection fulfillment. The council’s division reveals that the gospel presses Israel’s own theological questions to their climax in Jesus.
Acts 23 clarifies the gospel by identifying Paul’s trial with the hope of resurrection. The gospel is not detached spirituality; it announces resurrection hope fulfilled in Christ and carried forward through witness. The risen Lord Himself stands near Paul and ensures that the testimony will continue to Rome.
Courage, integrity, resurrection confidence, scriptural restraint, providential trust, patience under custody, and readiness for continued witness.
Focus Points
- Good conscience before God
- Injustice under religious authority
- Submission to Scripture
- The hope of resurrection
- Pharisee and Sadducee division
- The Lord’s nearness to His servant
- Courage under imprisonment
- Divine necessity of witness in Rome
- Human conspiracy against divine mission
- Providence through family members
- Providence through Roman authority
- Legal protection of witness
- Paul’s innocence concerning capital crimes
- The gospel advancing through custody
- Resurrection Hope
- The Lord’s Nearness
- Divine Necessity of Witness
- Providence
- Scripture Authority
- False Zeal and Violence
- Lawful Protection of Witness
- Innocence Before Civil Law
Cross References
But on the next day, desiring to know the truth about why He was accused by the Jews, He freed Him from the bonds, and commanded the chief priests and all the council to come together, and brought Paul down and set Him before them.
Immediate setup
The Lord said to Paul in the night by a vision, “Don’t be afraid, but speak and don’t be silent; for I am with You, and no one will attack You to harm You, for I have many people in this city.”
Prior divine encouragement
Now after these things had ended, Paul determined in the Spirit, when He had passed through Macedonia and Achaia, to go to Jerusalem, saying, “After I have been there, I must also see Rome.”
Rome trajectory
Now, behold, I go bound by the Spirit to Jerusalem, not knowing what will happen to me there; except that the Holy Spirit testifies in every city, saying that bonds and afflictions wait for me. But these things don’t count; nor do I hold my life dear to myself, so that I may finish my race with joy, and the ministry which I received from the Lord Jesus, to...
Suffering anticipated
Having hope toward God, which these also themselves look for, that there will be a resurrection of the dead, both of the just and unjust.
Resurrection hope continued
But Paul said, “I am standing before Caesar’s judgment seat, where I ought to be tried. I have done no wrong to the Jews, as You also know very well. For if I have done wrong and have committed anything worthy of death, I don’t refuse to die; but if none of those things is true that they accuse me of, no one can give me up to them. I appeal to Caesar!” Then...
Legal appeal trajectory
But the Lord stood by me and strengthened me, that through me the message might be fully proclaimed, and that all the Gentiles might hear. So I was delivered out of the mouth of the lion.
The Lord standing near
Now if Christ is preached, that He has been raised from the dead, how do some among You say that there is no resurrection of the dead? But if there is no resurrection of the dead, neither has Christ been raised. If Christ has not been raised, then our preaching is in vain, and Your faith also is in vain.
Resurrection centrality
Passages
Chapter opening: Acts 22:30-23:5
Looking steadfastly (ατενισας). See on this word 1:10 ; 3:12 ; 6:15 ; 7:55 ; 13:9 . Paul may have had weak eyes, but probably the earnest gaze was to see if he recognized any faces that were in the body that tried Stephen and to which he apparently once belonged. I have lived before God (πεπολιτευμα τω θεω). Perfect middle indicative of πολιτευω, old verb to manage affairs of city (πολις) or state, to be a citizen, behave as a citizen.
In the N. T. only here and Php 1:27 . The idea of citizenship was Greek and Roman, not Jewish. "He had lived as God's citizen, as a member of God's commonwealth" (Rackham). God (θεω) is the dative of personal interest. As God looked at it and in his relation to God. In all good conscience unto this day (παση συνειδησε αγαθη αχρ ταυτης της ημερας). This claim seems to lack tact, but for brevity's sake Paul sums up a whole speech in it.
He may have said much more than Luke here reports along the line of his speech the day before, but Paul did not make this claim without consideration. It appears to contradict his confession as the chief of sinners ( 1Ti 1:13-16 ). But that depends on one's interpretation of "good conscience." The word συνειδησις is literally "joint-knowledge" in Greek, Latin ( conscientia ) and English "conscience" from the Latin.
It is a late word from συνοιδα, to know together, common in O. T. , Apocrypha, Philo, Plutarch, New Testament, Stoics, ecclesiastical writers. In itself the word simply means consciousness of one's own thoughts ( Heb 10:2 ), or of one's own self, then consciousness of the distinction between right and wrong ( Ro 2:15 ) with approval or disapproval. But the conscience is not an infallible guide and acts according to the light that it has ( 1Co 8:7 , 10 ; 1Pe 2:19 ).
The conscience can be contaminated ( Heb 10:22 , evil πονηρας). All this and more must be borne in mind in trying to understand Paul's description of his motives as a persecutor. Alleviation of his guilt comes thereby, but not removal of guilt as he himself felt ( 1Ti 1:13-16 ). He means to say to the Sanhedrin that he persecuted Christians as a conscientious (though mistaken) Jew (Pharisee) just as he followed his conscience in turning from Judaism to Christianity.
It is a pointed disclaimer against the charge that he is a renegade Jew, an opposer of the law, the people, the temple. Paul addresses the Sanhedrin as an equal and has no "apologies" (in our sense) to make for his career as a whole. The golden thread of consistency runs through, as a good citizen in God's commonwealth. He had the consolation of a good conscience ( 1Pe 3:16 ).
The word does not occur in the Gospels and chiefly in Paul's Epistles, but we see it at work in Joh 8:9 (the interpolation 7:53-8:11 ).
Ananias (Hανανιας). Not the one in Lu 3:2 ; Joh 18:13 ; Ac 4:7 , but the son of Nebedaeus, nominated high priest by Herod, King of Chalcis, A. D. 48 and till A. D. 59. He was called to Rome A. D. 52 to answer "a charge of rapine and cruelty made against him by the Samaritans, but honourably acquitted" (Page). Though high priest, he was a man of bad character.
Them that stood by him (τοις παρεστωσιν αυτω). Dative case of second perfect participle of παριστημ, to place, and intransitive. See the same form in verse 4 (παρεστωτες). To smite him on the mouth (τυπτειν αυτου το στομα). See on 12:45 ; 18:17 . Cf. the treatment of Jesus ( Joh 18:22 ). Ananias was provoked by Paul's self-assertion while on trial before his judges.
"The act was illegal and peculiarly offensive to a Jew at the hands of a Jew" (Knowling). More self-control might have served Paul better. Smiting the mouth or cheek is a peculiarly irritating offence and one not uncommon among the Jews and this fact gives point to the command of Jesus to turn the other check ( Lu 6:29 where τυπτω is also used).
Thou whited wall (τοιχε κεκονιαμενε). Perfect passive participle of κονιαω (from κονια, dust or lime). The same word used in Mt 23:27 for "whited sepulchres" (ταφο κεκονιαμενο) which see. It is a picturesque way of calling Ananias a hypocrite, undoubtedly true, but not a particularly tactful thing for a prisoner to say to his judge, not to say Jewish high priest.
Besides, Paul had hurled back at him the word τυπτειν (smite) in his command, putting it first in the sentence (τυπτειν σε μελλε ο θεος) in strong emphasis. Clearly Paul felt that he, not Ananias, was living as a good citizen in God's commonwealth. And sittest thou to judge me? (Κα συ καθη κρινων με?) Literally, "And thou (being what thou art) art sitting (καθη, second person singular middle of καθημα, late form for καθησα, the uncontracted form) judging me."
Cf. Lu 22:30 . Κα συ at the beginning of a question expresses indignation. Contrary to the law (παρανομων). Present active participle of παρανομεω, old verb to act contrary to the law, here alone in the N. T. , "acting contrary to the law."
Of God (του θεου). As God's representative in spite of his bad character ( De 17:8 f. ). Here was a charge of irreverence, to say the least. The office called for respect.
I wist not (ουκ ηιδειν). Second past perfect of οιδα used as an imperfect. The Greek naturally means that Paul did not know that it was the high priest who gave the order to smite his mouth. If this view is taken, several things may be said by way of explanation. The high priest may not have had on his official dress as the meeting was called hurriedly by Lysias.
Paul had been away so long that he may not have known Ananias on sight. And then Paul may have had poor eyesight or the high priest may not have been sitting in the official seat. Another way of explaining it is to say that Paul was so indignant, even angry, at the command that he spoke without considering who it was that gave the order. The Greek allows this idea also.
At any rate Paul at once recognizes the justice of the point made against him. He had been guilty of irreverence against the office of high priest as the passage from Ex 22:18 (LXX) shows and confesses his fault, but the rebuke was deserved. Jesus did not threaten ( 1Pe 2:23 ) when smitten on the cheek ( Joh 18:22 ), but he did protest against the act and did not turn the other cheek.
But when Paul perceived (γνους δε ο Παυλος). Perceiving (second aorist ingressive of γινωσκω). Paul quickly saw that his cause was ruined before the Sanhedrin by his unwitting attack on the high priest. It was impossible to get a fair hearing. Hence, Vincent says, "Paul, with great tact, seeks to bring the two parties of the council into collision with each other."
So Alford argues with the motto "divide and conquer." Farrar condemns Paul and takes 24:21 as a confession of error here, but that is reading into Paul's word about the resurrection more than he says. Page considers Luke's report meagre and unsatisfactory. Rackham thinks that the trial was already started and that Paul repeated part of his speech of the day before when "the Sadducees received his words with ostentatious scepticism and ridicule: this provoked counter-expressions of sympathy and credulity among the Pharisees."
But all this is inference. We do not have to adopt the Jesuitical principle that the end justifies the means in order to see shrewdness and hard sense in what Paul said and did. Paul knew, of course, that the Sanhedrin was nearly evenly divided between Pharisees and Sadducees, for he himself had been a Pharisee. I am a Pharisee, a son of Pharisees (Εγω Φαρισαιος ειμ υιος Φαρισαιων).
This was strictly true as we know from his Epistles ( Php 3:5 ). Touching the hope and resurrection of the dead I am called in question (περ ελπιδος κα αναστασεως νεκρων κρινομα). This was true also and this is the point that Paul mentions in 24:21 . His failure to mention again the fact that he was a Pharisee throws no discredit on Luke's report here. The chief point of difference between Pharisees and Sadducees was precisely this matter of the resurrection.
And this was Paul's cardinal doctrine as a Christian minister. It was this fact that convinced him that Jesus was the Messiah and was "the very centre of his faith" (Page) and of his preaching. It was not a mere trick for Paul to proclaim this fact here and so divide the Sanhedrin. As a matter of fact, the Pharisees held aloof when the Sadducees persecuted Peter and the other apostles for preaching resurrection in the case of Jesus and even Gamaliel threw cold water on the effort to punish them for it ( Ac 5:34-39 ).
So then Paul was really recurring to the original cleavage on this point and was able to score a point against the Sadducees as Gamaliel, his great teacher, had done before him. Besides, "Paul and Pharisaism seem to us such opposite ideas that we often forget that to Paul Christianity was the natural development of Judaism" (Page). Paul shows this in Ga 3 ; Ro 9-11 .
When he had so said (τουτο αυτου λαλουντος). Genitive absolute of present participle (Westcott and Hort) rather than aorist (ειποντος). While he was saying this. A dissension (στασις). This old word for standing or station ( Heb 9:8 ) from ιστημ, to place, we have seen already to mean insurrection ( Ac 19:40 which see). Here it is strife as in 15:2 . Was divided (εσχισθη). See on 14:4 .
There is no resurrection, neither angel, nor spirit (μη εινα αναστασιν μητε αγγελον μητε πνευμα). Infinitive with negative μη in indirect assertion. These points constitute the chief doctrinal differences between the Pharisees and the Sadducees. Both (αμφοτερα). Here used though three items of belief are mentioned as in 19:16 where the seven sons of Sceva are thus described. This idiom is common enough in papyri and Byzantine Greek (Robertson, Grammar , p. 745).
Strove (διεμαχοντο). Imperfect middle of διαμαχομα, old Attic verb, to fight it out (between, back and forth, fiercely). Here only in the N.T. It was a lively scrap and Luke pictures it as going on. The Pharisees definitely take Paul's side. And what if a spirit hath spoken to him or an angel? (ε δε πνευμα ελαλησεν αυτω η αγγελοσ?). This is aposiopesis, not uncommon in the N.T., as in Lu 13:9 ; Joh 6:62 (Robertson, Grammar , p. 1203). See one also in Ex 32:32 .
When there arose a great dissension (πολλης της γινομενης στασεως). Present middle participle (genitive absolute). Literally, "dissension becoming much." Lest Paul should be torn in pieces by them (μη διασπασθη ο Παυλος). First aorist passive subjunctive of διασπαω, to draw in two, to tear in pieces, old verb, in the N. T. only here and Mr 5:4 of tearing chains in two.
The subjunctive with μη is the common construction after a verb of fearing (Robertson, Grammar , p. 995). The soldiers (το στρατευμα). The army, the band of soldiers and so in verse 27 . To go down (καταβαν). Second aorist active participle of καταβαινω, having gone down. Take him by force (αρπασα). To seize. The soldiers were to seize and save Paul from the midst of (εκ μεσου) the rabbis or preachers (in their rage to get at each other).
Paul was more of a puzzle to Lysias now than ever.
The night following (τη επιουση νυκτ). Locative case, on the next (following) night. The Lord (ο κυριος). Jesus. Paul never needed Jesus more than now. On a previous occasion the whole church prayed for Peter's release ( 12:5 ), but Paul clearly had no such grip on the church as that, though he had been kindly welcomed ( 21:18 ). In every crisis Jesus appears to him (cf.
Ac 18:9 ). It looked dark for Paul till Jesus spoke. Once before in Jerusalem Jesus spoke words of cheer ( 22:18 ). Then he was told to leave Jerusalem. Now he is to have "cheer" or "courage" (θαρσε). Jesus used this very word to others ( Mt 9:2 , 22 ; Mr 10:49 ). It is a brave word. Thou hast testified (διεμαρτυρω). First aorist middle indicative second person singular of διαμαρτυρομα, strong word (see on 22:18 ).
Must thou (σε δε). That is the needed word and on this Paul leans. His hopes ( 19:21 ) of going to Rome will not be in vain. He can bide Christ's time now. And Jesus has approved his witness in Jerusalem.
Banded together (ποιησαντες συστροφην). See on 19:40 (riot), but here conspiracy, secret combination, binding together like twisted cords. Bound themselves under a curse (ανεθεματισαν εαυτους). First aorist active indicative of αναθεματιζω, a late word, said by Cremer and Thayer to be wholly Biblical or ecclesiastical. But Deissmann ( Light from the Ancient East , p.
95) quotes several examples of the verb in an Attic cursing tablet from Megara of the first or second century A. D. This proof shows that the word, as well as αναθεμα (substantive) from which the verb is derived, was employed by pagans as well as by Jews. Deissmann suggests that Greek Jews like the seven sons of Sceva may have been the first to coin it. It occurs in the LXX as well as Mr 14:71 (which see and Luke 21:5 ); Ac 23:12 , 14 , 21 .
They placed themselves under an anathema or curse, devoted themselves to God (cf. Le 27:28 f. ; 1Co 16:22 ). Drink (πειν=πιειν). Second aorist active infinitive of πινω. For this shortened form see Robertson, Grammar , p. 343. Till they had killed (εως ου αποκτεινωσιν). First aorist active subjunctive of αποκτεινω, common verb. No reason to translate "had killed," simply "till they should kill," the aorist merely punctiliar action, the subjunctive retained instead of the optative for vividness as usual in the Koine (Robertson, Grammar , pp.
974-6). Same construction in verse 14 . King Saul took an "anathema" that imperilled Jonathan ( 1Sa 14:24 ). Perhaps the forty felt that the rabbis could find some way to absolve the curse if they failed. See this verse repeated in verse 21 .
More than forty (πλειους τεσσερακοντα). Without "than" (η) as in verse 21 ; 24:11 and often in the ancient Greek. Conspiracy (συνωμοσιαν). Old word from συνομνυμ, to swear together. Only here in the N.T.
Came to the chief priests and the elders (προσελθοντες τοις αρχιερευσιν κα τοις πρεσβυτεροις). The Sanhedrin, just as Judas did ( Lu 22:4 ). With a great curse (αναθεματ). This use of the same word as the verb repeated in the instrumental case is in imitation of the Hebrew absolute infinitive and common in the LXX, the very idiom and words of De 13:15 ; 20:17 , an example of translation Greek, though found in other languages (Robertson, Grammar , p.
531). See on Lu 21:5 for the distinction between αναθεμα and αναθημα. Jesus had foretold: "Whoso killeth you will think that he doeth God service" ( Joh 16:2 ).
Ye (υμεις). Emphatic. Signify (εμφανισατε). First aorist active imperative of εμφανιζω. Make plain from εμφανης, chiefly in Acts. Repeated in verse 22 . The authority is with the chiliarch not with the Sanhedrin, but he had appealed to the Sanhedrin for advice. As though ye would judge of his case more exactly (ως μελλοντας διαγινωσκειν ακριβεστερον τα περ αυτου).
Hως with the participle gives the alleged reason as here. So also in verse 20 . Διαγνοσκω, old verb to distinguish accurately, only here in N. T. and 24:22 . Or ever come near (προ του εγγισα αυτον). "Before the coming near as to him." Προ and the genitive of the articular infinitive of εγγιζω with accusative of general reference. We are ready to slay him (ετοιμο εσμεν του ανελειν αυτον).
Genitive of purpose of the articular infinitive after the adjective ετοιμο (Robertson, Grammar , p. 1061). Ανελειν, second aorist active of αναιρεω.
Their lying in wait (την ενεδραν). Old word from εν (in) and εδρα (seat), ambush. In N. T. only here and 25:3 . Accusative object of ακουσας. He came (παραγενομενος). Second aorist middle participle of παραγινομα. It may mean, "having come upon them" and so discount their plot, a graphic touch. Vincent thinks that some Pharisee, since Paul was a Pharisee and so a member of the "guild," told his nephew of the plot.
Perhaps, and perhaps not. Told Paul (απηγγειλεν τω Παυλω). This nephew is not known otherwise. He may be a student here from Tarsus as Paul once was. Anyhow he knows what to do when he catches on to the conspirators. He had enough address to get into the barracks where Paul was. He ran the risk of death if discovered.
Called unto him (προσκαλεσαμενος). First aorist participle indirect middle, calling to himself. Paul laid his plans as energetically as if Jesus had not promised that he would see Rome ( 23:11 ). Bring (απαγε). "Take away."
Paul the prisoner (ο δεσμιος Παυλος). Bound (δεσμιος) to a soldier, but not with two chains ( 21:33 ), and with some freedom to see his friends as later ( 28:16 ), in military custody ( custodia militaris ). This was better than custodia publica (public custody), the common prison, but more confining. Who hath something to say to thee (εχοντα τ λαλησα σο). Same idiom as in verse 17 , 19 , but λαλησα here instead of απαγγειλα.
Took him by the hand (επιλαβομενος της χειρος αυτου). Kindly touch in Lysias, ut fiduciam adolescentis confirmaret (Bengel). Note genitive with the second aorist middle (indirect, to himself) of επιλαμβανω as in Lu 8:54 with κρατησας which see. How old the young man (νεανιας) was we do not know, but it is the very word used of Paul in 7:58 when he helped in the killing of Stephen, a young man in the twenties probably.
See also 20:9 of Eutychus. He is termed νεανισκος in verse 22 . Asked him privately (κατ' ιδιαν επυνθανετο). Imperfect middle, began to ask (inchoative).
The Jews (ο Ιουδαιο). As if the whole nation was in the conspiracy and so in verse 12 . The conspirators may have belonged to the Zealots, but clearly they represented the state of Jewish feeling toward Paul in Jerusalem. Have agreed (συνεθεντο). Second aorist middle indicative of συντιθημ, old verb to join together, to agree. Already this form in Lu 22:5 which see.
See also Joh 9:22 ; Ac 24:9 . To bring down (οπως καταγαγηις). Very words of the conspirators in verse 15 as if the young man overheard. Second aorist active subjunctive of καταγω with οπως in final clause, still used, but nothing like so common as ινα though again in verse 23 (Robertson, Grammar , p. 985). As though thou wouldest inquire (ως μελλων πυνθανεσθα).
Just as in verse 15 except that here μελλων refers to Lysias instead of to the conspirators as in verse 15 . The singular is used by the youth out of deference to the authority of Lysias and so modifies a bit the scheming of the conspirators, not "absurd" as Page holds.
Do not therefore yield unto them (Συ ουν μη πεισθηις αυτοις). First aorist passive subjunctive of πειθω, common verb, here to be persuaded by, to listen to, to obey, to yield to. With negative and rightly. Do not yield to them (dative) at all. On the aorist subjunctive with μη in prohibitions against committing an act see Robertson, Grammar , pp. 851-4. For there lie in wait (ενεδρευουσιν γαρ).
Present active indicative of ενεδρευω, old verb from ενεδρα (verse 16 ), in the N. T. only here and Lu 11:54 which see. Till they have slain him (εως ου ανελωσιν αυτον). Same idiom as in verse 12 save that here we have ανελωσιν (second aorist active subjunctive) instead of αποκτεινωσιν (another word for kill), "till they slay him." Looking for the promise from thee (προσδεχομενο την απο σου επαγγελιαν).
This item is all that is needed to put the scheme through, the young man shrewdly adds.
Tell no man (μηδεν εκλαλησα). Indirect command ( oratio obliqua ) after παραγγειλας (charging) with first aorist active infinitive of εκλαλεω (in ancient Greek, but here only in N.T.), but construction changed to direct in rest of the sentence ( oratio recta ) as in 1:4 , "that thou hast signified these things to me" (οτ ταυτα ενεφανισας προς εμε). Same verb here as in verse 15 . This change is common in the N.T. (Robertson, Grammar , p. 1047).
Two (τινας δυο). "Some two" as in Lu 7:19 , indicating (Page) that they were not specially chosen. Soldiers (στρατιωτας), spearmen (δεξιολαβους). The three varieties of troops in a Roman army like the cohort of Lysias (Page). The στρατιωτα were the heavy-armed legionaries, the ιππεις belonged to every legion, the δεξιολαβο were light-armed supplementary troops who carried a lance in the right hand (δεξιος, right, λαμβανω, to take).
Vulgate, lancearios . At the third hour of the night (απο τριτης ωρας της νυκτος). About nine in the evening.
Provide beasts (κτενη παραστησα). Change from direct to indirect discourse just the opposite of that in verse 22 . Beasts (κτηνη). For riding as here or for baggage. See on Lu 10:34 . Asses or horses, but not war-horses. Since Paul was chained to a soldier, another animal would be required for baggage. It was also seventy miles and a change of horses might be needed.
The extreme precaution of Lysias is explained in some Latin MSS. as due to fear of a night attack with the result that he might be accused to Felix of bribery. Luke also probably accompanied Paul. To bring safe (ινα διασωσωσιν). Final clause with ινα and the first aorist active subjunctive of διασωζω, old verb, to save through (δια) to a finish. Eight times in the N.
T. ( Mt 14:36 ; Lu 7:3 ; Ac 23:24 ; 27:43 , 44 ; 28:1 , 4 ; 1Pe 3:20 ). Unto Felix the governor (προς Φηλικα τον ηγεμονα). Felix was a brother of Pallas, the notorious favourite of Claudius. Both had been slaves and were now freedmen. Felix was made procurator of Judea by Claudius A. D. 52. He held the position till Festus succeeded him after complaints by the Jews to Nero.
He married Drusilla the daughter of Herod Agrippa I with the hope of winning the favour of the Jews. He was one of the most depraved men of his time. Tacitus says of him that "with all cruelty and lust he exercised the power of a king with the spirit of a slave." The term "governor" (ηγεμων) means "leader" from ηγεομα, to lead, and was applied to leaders of all sorts (emperors, kings, procurators).
In the N. T. it is used of Pilate ( Mt 27:2 ), of Felix, ( Ac 23:24 , 26 , 33 ; 24:1 ), of Festus ( 26:30 ).
And he wrote (γραψας). First aorist active participle of γραφω, agreeing with the subject (Lysias) of ειπεν (said) back in verse 23 (beginning). After this form (εχουσαν τον τυπον τουτον). Textus Receptus has περιεχουσαν. The use of τυπον (type or form) like exemplum in Latin (Page who quotes Cicero Ad Att . IX. 6. 3) may give merely the purport or substantial contents of the letter.
But there is no reason for thinking that it is not a genuine copy since the letter may have been read in open court before Felix, and Luke was probably with Paul. The Roman law required that a subordinate officer like Lysias in reporting a case to his superior should send a written statement of the case and it was termed elogium . A copy of the letter may have been given Paul after his appeal to Caesar.
It was probably written in Latin. The letter is a "dexterous mixture of truth and falsehood" (Furneaux) with the stamp of genuineness. It puts things in a favourable light for Lysias and makes no mention of his order to scourge Paul.
Most excellent (κρατιστω). See on Lu 1:3 to Theophilus though not in Ac 1:1 . It is usual in addressing men of rank as here, like our "Your Excellency" in 24:3 and Paul uses it to Festus in 26:25 . Greeting (χαιρειν). Absolute infinitive with independent or absolute nominative (Κλαυδιος Λυσιας) as is used in letters ( Ac 15:23 ; Jas 1:1 ) and in countless papyri (Robertson, Grammar , p. 1092).
Was seized (συλλημφθεντα). First aorist passive participle of συλλαμβανω. Rescued him having learned that he was a Roman (εξειλαμεν μαθων οτ Ρομαιος εστιν). Wendt, Zoeckler, and Furneaux try to defend this record of two facts by Lysias in the wrong order from being an actual lie as Bengel rightly says. Lysias did rescue Paul and he did learn that he was a Roman, but in this order.
He did not first learn that he was a Roman and then rescue him as his letter states. The use of the aorist participle (μαθων from μανθανω) after the principal verb εξειλαμεν (second aorist middle of εξαιρεω, to take out to oneself, to rescue) can be either simultaneous action or antecedent. There is in Greek no such idiom as the aorist participle of subsequent action (Robertson, Grammar , pp.
1112-14). Lysias simply reversed the order of the facts and omitted the order for scourging Paul to put himself in proper light with Felix his superior officer and actually poses as the protector of a fellow Roman citizen.
To know (επιγνωνα). To know fully, επ, second aorist active infinitive. They accused him (ενεκαλουν αυτω). Imperfect active indicative, were accusing him (dative), repeating their charges.
Concerning questions of their law (περ ζητηματα του νομου αυτων). The very distinction drawn by Gallio in Corinth ( Ac 18:14 f. ). On the word see on 15:2 . But to have nothing laid to his charge worthy of death or of bonds (μηδεν δε αξιον θανατου η δεσμων εχοντα ενκλημα). Literally, "having no accusation (or crime) worthy of death or of bonds." This phrase here only in the N.
T. Εγκλημα is old word for accusation or crime from εγκαλεω used in verse 28 and in the N. T. only here and 25:16 . Lysias thus expresses the opinion that Paul ought to be set free and the lenient treatment that Paul received in Caesarea and Rome (first imprisonment) is probably due to this report of Lysias. Every Roman magistrate before whom Paul appears declares him innocent (Gallio, Lysias, Felix, Festus).
When it was shown to me that there would be a plot (μηνυθεισης μο επιβουλης εσεσθα). Two constructions combined; genitive absolute (μηνυθεισης επιβουλης, first aorist passive participle of μηνυω) and future infinitive (εσεσθα as if επιβουλην accusative of general reference used) in indirect assertion after μηνυω (Robertson, Grammar , p. 877). Charging his accusers also (παραγγειλας κα τοις κατηγοροις).
First aorist active participle of παραγγελλω with which compare μαθων above (verse 27 ), not subsequent action. Dative case in κατηγοροις. Before thee (επ σου). Common idiom for "in the presence of" when before a judge (like Latin apud ) as in 24:20 , 21 ; 25:26 ; 26:2 . What happened to the forty conspirators we have no way of knowing. Neither they nor the Jews from Asia are heard of more during the long five years of Paul's imprisonment in Caesarea and Rome.
As it was commanded them (κατα το διατεταγμενον αυτοις). "According to that which was commanded them," perfect passive articular participle of διατασσω. By night (δια νυκτος). Through the night, travelling by night forty miles from Jerusalem to Antipatris which was founded by Herod the Great and was on the road from Jerusalem to Caesarea, a hard night's ride.
And they (οιτινες). Which very ones, the cavalry, the horsemen of verse 31 . Delivered (αναδοντες). Second aorist active participle of αναδιδωμ, old verb to give up, to hand over, here only in the N.T. Presented Paul also (παρεστησαν κα τον Παυλον). First aorist active (transitive, not second aorist intransitive) indicative of παριστημ, common verb to present or place beside. What would Paul's friends in Caesarea (Philip and his daughters) think of the prophecy of Agabus now so quickly come true.
When he had read it (αναγνους). Second aorist active participle of αναγινωσκω, to know again, to read. Of what province he was (εκ ποιας επαρχειας εστιν). Tense of εστιν (is) retained in indirect question. Ποιας is strictly "of what kind of" province, whether senatorial or imperial. Cilicia, like Judea, was under the control of the propraetor of Syria (imperial province).
Paul's arrest was in Jerusalem and so under the jurisdiction of Felix unless it was a matter of insurrection when he could appeal to the propraetor of Syria.
I will hear thy cause (διακουσομα). "I will hear thee fully" (δια). When--are come (παραγενωντα). Second aorist middle subjunctive of παραγινομα with temporal conjunction οταν, indefinite temporal clause of future time (Robertson, Grammar , p. 972), "whenever thine accusers come." In Herod's palace (εν τω πραιτωριω). The Latin word πραετοριυμ. The word meant the camp of the general, then the palace of the governor as here and Mt 27:27 which see, and then the camp of praetorian soldiers or rather the praetorian guard as in Php 1:13 .