Moses
Pharaoh Rejects the Lord and Increases Israel’s Burdens
When the Lord claims His people for worship, Pharaoh resists with defiance and heavier bondage, but even intensified suffering becomes the stage for God’s promised redemption.
Reading a chapter
What this page is: Each chapter page shows the big idea, the argument flow, key original-language terms, doctrine connections, and passage units, all in one place.
How to use it: Start with the Overview tab to get the chapter's main point. Then move to Passages to study individual units, or Language to trace key terms.
Going deeper: The Doctrines and Motifs tabs show how this chapter connects to the broader biblical story.
When the Lord claims His people for worship, Pharaoh resists with defiance and heavier bondage, but even intensified suffering becomes the stage for God’s promised redemption.
Exodus 5 argues that Pharaoh’s resistance is not merely political stubbornness but theological rebellion against the Lord’s authority. Pharaoh does not know the Lord, will not obey His word, and treats worship as idleness. The chapter also exposes the painful reality that obedience to God can initially intensify opposition. Moses’ mission appears to fail before it succeeds, yet this failure is not outside God’s plan.
The Lord had already foretold Pharaoh’s refusal, and Moses’ lament sets the stage for the Lord’s renewed declaration of redemption in Exodus 6.
Israel, the covenant people redeemed from Egypt and taught to understand that the Lord’s deliverance came through conflict, resistance, judgment, and covenant faithfulness.
Egypt after Moses and Aaron have returned from Midian, gathered Israel’s elders, and seen the people believe and worship because the Lord had visited them.
When the Lord claims His people for worship, Pharaoh resists with defiance and heavier bondage, but even intensified suffering becomes the stage for God’s promised redemption.
Moses
Israel, the covenant people redeemed from Egypt and taught to understand that the Lord’s deliverance came through conflict, resistance, judgment, and covenant faithfulness.
Egypt after Moses and Aaron have returned from Midian, gathered Israel’s elders, and seen the people believe and worship because the Lord had visited them.
- Israel remains enslaved under Pharaoh’s labor system. Moses and Aaron’s first confrontation with Pharaoh results not in immediate relief but intensified oppression, public blame, and discouragement among Israel’s own officers.
Egyptian forced labor relied on quotas, oversight, and harsh discipline. Brickmaking required straw as a binding material. Pharaoh’s decision to withhold straw while maintaining the same quota weaponizes labor administration to crush Israel’s hope and discredit Moses’ message.
Exodus 5 records the first public confrontation between the Lord’s claim and Pharaoh’s arrogance. The chapter demonstrates that redemption will not come by Pharaoh’s cooperation but by the Lord’s mighty hand, as already foretold in Exodus 3–4.
Moses and Aaron declare the Lord’s demand, Pharaoh rejects the Lord’s authority, Israel’s labor is intensified, the people’s officers blame Moses and Aaron, and Moses brings the crisis back to the Lord in anguished prayer.
Theological exposition and fulfillment
Exodus 5 prepares gospel clarity by showing that bondage is not merely unfortunate hardship but rival lordship. Pharaoh claims Israel’s bodies, time, labor, and worship, while the Lord claims them as His people. The first demand for release exposes resistance rather than producing immediate freedom. This anticipates the deeper gospel reality that sinners cannot negotiate their way out of bondage.
Redemption requires God’s mighty action. In Christ, God confronts the deeper tyrannies of sin, death, and Satan, and redeems His people not merely for relief but for worshipful service to Him.
The Lord claims Israel for worship, but Pharaoh denies the Lord’s authority and refuses to release the people.
Pharaoh increases labor demands to punish Israel’s desire to sacrifice to the Lord and to discredit Moses’ mission.
The Israelite officers appeal to Pharaoh’s sense of justice, but Pharaoh uses the appeal to reinforce His accusation and demand.
Israel’s officers turn against Moses and Aaron because obedience has brought immediate pain rather than relief.
Moses brings His confusion and anguish to the Lord, creating the immediate context for God’s renewed promise in Exodus 6.
- 1: Moses and Aaron present the Lord’s demand that Pharaoh release Israel for worship.
- 2-5: Pharaoh denies the Lord’s authority and refuses to obey.
- 6-14: Pharaoh increases the burden of Israel’s labor to make the people suffer for Moses’ request.
- 15-19: Israel’s officers plead with Pharaoh but receive only accusation and renewed pressure.
- 20-21: The officers blame Moses and Aaron for worsening their condition.
- 22-23: Moses turns to the Lord with honest anguish over the mission’s painful beginning.
Theological Argument
Exodus 5 argues that Pharaoh’s resistance is not merely political stubbornness but theological rebellion against the Lord’s authority. Pharaoh does not know the Lord, will not obey His word, and treats worship as idleness. The chapter also exposes the painful reality that obedience to God can initially intensify opposition. Moses’ mission appears to fail before it succeeds, yet this failure is not outside God’s plan.
The Lord had already foretold Pharaoh’s refusal, and Moses’ lament sets the stage for the Lord’s renewed declaration of redemption in Exodus 6.
From the LORD’s command, to Pharaoh’s rejection, to intensified oppression, to Israel’s discouragement, to Moses’ anguished appeal to God.
- 1.The LORD asserts His ownership over Israel and demands their release for worship.
- 2.Pharaoh rejects the LORD’s authority because he does not know Him and refuses to obey Him.
- 3.Oppressive power interprets worship as waste because it values people only for production and control.
- 4.Pharaoh uses intensified burdens to crush hope and turn the oppressed against the LORD’s messengers.
- 5.Moses’ lament brings the crisis back to the LORD, where the true answer to oppression must come.
Theological Focus
- The Lord’s authority over Pharaoh
- Worship as the goal of redemption
- Pharaoh’s rebellion and ignorance of the Lord
- Oppression as rival lordship
- The burden of obedience under resistance
- Lament in the face of delayed deliverance
- The conflict between serving Pharaoh and serving the Lord
- The Lord’s claim over His people
- Worship versus bondage
- Pharaoh’s ignorance of God
- Oppression’s strategy
- Obedience and worsening circumstances
- Lament before God
- The word of God against imperial power
- Divine Lordship
- Human Rebellion
- Worship
- Oppression
- Providence
- Prayer and Lament
- Redemption
Theological Themes
The command 'Let my people go' declares that Israel belongs to the Lord, not Pharaoh.
The conflict is not merely between freedom and slavery but between worshiping the Lord and serving Pharaoh under oppression.
Pharaoh’s question, 'Who is the Lord?' reveals theological defiance that the plagues will answer.
Pharaoh increases labor to suppress hope, discredit the word of God, and keep Israel too burdened to pursue worship.
Moses obeys the Lord, but the immediate result is intensified suffering, showing that early hardship does not prove divine failure.
Moses does not abandon the mission, but He brings His confusion and distress to the Lord.
Pharaoh rejects the Lord’s word, but the chapter prepares for the Lord to reveal His name and power publicly.
Covenant Significance
Exodus 5 shows the covenant conflict between the Lord and Pharaoh. Israel is the Lord’s people, His firstborn son, and therefore Pharaoh has no ultimate claim over them. The demand for release is not rooted in Israel’s preference but in the Lord’s covenant ownership. Pharaoh’s refusal sets Him against the covenant God and prepares for judgment.
- Covenant ownership - The phrase 'my people' identifies Israel as belonging to the Lord.
- Covenant worship - The request to hold a festival and sacrifice shows that deliverance is ordered toward worship.
- Covenant opposition - Pharaoh’s refusal is rebellion against the Lord’s covenant claim.
- Covenant testing - Israel’s suffering increases after the promise of deliverance, testing whether the people will trust the Lord’s word when circumstances worsen.
- Covenant lament - Moses brings the apparent contradiction between promise and experience before the Lord.
- Genesis 15:13-16 - God had foretold that Abraham’s descendants would be enslaved and mistreated before deliverance.
- Exodus 3:18-20 - The Lord had already told Moses to request release for sacrifice and had foretold that Pharaoh would not let them go except by a mighty hand.
- Exodus 4:22-23 - The Lord identified Israel as His firstborn son and warned Pharaoh of judgment if He refused release.
- Exodus 6:1-8 - The Lord answers Moses’ lament by reaffirming His name, covenant, and promise to redeem Israel.
Canonical Connections
The phrase 'my people' connects Exodus deliverance to the wider biblical truth that God redeems a people for Himself.
Israel is released not for autonomy but for worship, a theme fulfilled in the church’s redeemed service to God.
Pharaoh asks who the Lord is, and the following chapters answer through signs, plagues, judgment, and deliverance.
The worsening burden fits a biblical pattern in which God’s people endure intensified opposition before redemption or vindication.
Moses’ complaint joins the broader biblical pattern of bringing painful confusion before God.
Cross References
Now there arose a new king over Egypt, who didn’t know Joseph. He said to his people, “Behold, the people of the children of Israel are more and mightier than we. Come, let’s deal wisely with them, lest they multiply, and it happen that...
In the course of those many days, the king of Egypt died, and the children of Israel sighed because of the bondage, and they cried, and their cry came up to God because of the bondage. God heard their groaning, and God remembered his...
Yahweh said, “I have surely seen the affliction of my people who are in Egypt, and have heard their cry because of their taskmasters, for I know their sorrows. I have come down to deliver them out of the hand of the Egyptians, and to bring...
Now Yahweh said to Abram, “Leave your country, and your relatives, and your father’s house, and go to the land that I will show you. I will make of you a great nation. I will bless you and make your name great. You will be a blessing. I...
He said to Abram, “Know for sure that your offspring will live as foreigners in a land that is not theirs, and will serve them. They will afflict them four hundred years. I will also judge that nation, whom they will serve. Afterward they...
God spoke to Israel in the visions of the night, and said, “Jacob, Jacob!” He said, “Here I am.” He said, “I am God, the God of your father. Don’t be afraid to go down into Egypt, for there I will make of you a great nation. I will go down...
Exodus 5 prepares gospel clarity by showing that bondage is not merely unfortunate hardship but rival lordship. Pharaoh claims Israel’s bodies, time, labor, and worship, while the Lord claims them as His people. The first demand for release exposes resistance rather than producing immediate freedom. This anticipates the deeper gospel reality that sinners cannot negotiate their way out of bondage.
Redemption requires God’s mighty action. In Christ, God confronts the deeper tyrannies of sin, death, and Satan, and redeems His people not merely for relief but for worshipful service to Him.
- The Lord claims His people - The gospel begins with God’s saving claim, not human self-ownership.
- Bondage resists release - Pharaoh does not willingly surrender Israel, showing that redemption must be accomplished by divine power.
- Worship is salvation’s aim - The Lord demands release so His people may worship, reminding readers that salvation restores people to God.
- Opposition does not cancel promise - The first confrontation worsens Israel’s condition, but the Lord’s promise remains unchanged.
- Lament belongs within faith - Moses brings His distress to God, showing that faith can pray honestly while waiting for deliverance.
- Christ brings the greater Exodus - Jesus delivers His people from deeper bondage and brings them into the worship and service of the living God.
- Do not reduce redemption to improved circumstances.
- Do not present Pharaoh as merely a harsh employer · He is resisting the Lord’s claim.
- Do not treat worship as secondary to deliverance.
- Do not assume that hardship after obedience means God has failed.
- Do not make Moses’ anguish the final word · the chapter is designed to lead into the Lord’s renewed promise in Exodus 6.
- Do not jump to Christ without preserving the Exodus pattern of bondage, rival lordship, divine claim, resistance, judgment, and worship.
Primary Emphasis
Exodus 5 contributes to the biblical pattern of oppressive power resisting God’s claim over His people and treating worship as a threat. Moses’ apparent failure and Israel’s increased suffering prepare for deliverance by divine power rather than human negotiation. This points forward to Christ, the greater Deliverer, who enters a world under bondage, faces rejection, suffers before victory, and secures redemption that brings His people out from slavery to sin into worshipful service to God.
Chapter Contribution
Exodus 5 argues that Pharaoh’s resistance is not merely political stubbornness but theological rebellion against the Lord’s authority. Pharaoh does not know the Lord, will not obey His word, and treats worship as idleness. The chapter also exposes the painful reality that obedience to God can initially intensify opposition. Moses’ mission appears to fail before it succeeds, yet this failure is not outside God’s plan.
The Lord had already foretold Pharaoh’s refusal, and Moses’ lament sets the stage for the Lord’s renewed declaration of redemption in Exodus 6.
Israel is called 'my people' by the Lord, emphasizing that Pharaoh’s control is illegitimate because God’s covenant claim is prior and supreme.
The Lord speaks with rightful authority even in Pharaoh’s court, showing that earthly rulers are accountable to the God they refuse to acknowledge.
The delay and intensified suffering do not mean that God has lost control; they prepare the setting in which His redeeming power will be unmistakably displayed.
Pharaoh embodies a rebellious power structure that treats people as production units and answers God's claim with harsher bondage.
Pharaoh’s question, 'Who is the Lord?' reveals proud resistance to divine command, not merely lack of information.
Moses' mission exposes both the necessity and weakness of human mediation until God acts decisively through His appointed deliverer.
Moses' complaint shows that bewilderment should be brought before the Lord rather than suppressed or turned into unbelieving retreat.
The passage sits within the larger revealed plan God had already announced, showing that even painful escalation is not outside the Lord's covenant purpose.
The first act of obedience produces heavier affliction, reminding readers that God’s saving purposes may advance through intensified opposition before visible relief appears.
Pharaoh labels the Lord’s message as false words, showing how oppressive power often attacks God’s truth to preserve control.
Pharaoh understands Israel's worship as a threat to His control, revealing that redemption is not merely release from labor but liberation for service to the Lord.
The demand to let Israel go is ordered toward worship; redemption is not freedom into autonomy but freedom to serve the living God.
The Lord claims Israel as His people and commands Pharaoh to release them for worship.
Pharaoh’s question, 'Who is the Lord?' reveals defiant refusal to know, obey, or submit to God.
The stated purpose of Israel’s release is worship and sacrifice to the Lord.
Pharaoh’s labor policy shows systemic cruelty designed to dominate and demoralize God’s people.
The worsening of circumstances does not fall outside God’s announced plan, since Pharaoh’s resistance had already been foretold.
Moses brings confusion and distress to the Lord in prayer when the mission appears to worsen Israel’s suffering.
The chapter intensifies the need for redemption by showing that Pharaoh will not release Israel apart from the Lord’s mighty intervention.
Theological exposition and fulfillment
- Exodus 5 prepares gospel clarity by showing that bondage is not merely unfortunate hardship but rival lordship. Pharaoh claims Israel’s bodies, time, labor, and worship, while the Lord claims them as His people. The first demand for release exposes resistance rather than producing immediate freedom. This anticipates the deeper gospel reality that sinners cannot negotiate their way out of bondage. Redemption requires God’s mighty action. In Christ, God confronts the deeper tyrannies of sin, death, and Satan, and redeems His people not merely for relief but for worshipful service to Him.
Sense YHWH, the covenant name of God
Definition The personal covenant name of Israel’s God.
References Exodus 5:1-2
Lexicon YHWH, the covenant name of God
Why it matters Pharaoh’s question, 'Who is the Lord?' becomes the theological conflict that the Exodus judgments will answer.
Sense my people
Definition A people belonging to someone; here Israel as belonging to the LORD.
References Exodus 5:1
Lexicon my people
Why it matters The phrase establishes the Lord’s covenant claim over Israel against Pharaoh’s oppressive claim.
Sense to send, release, let go
Definition To send away or release.
References Exodus 5:1-2
Lexicon to send, release, let go
Why it matters This verb becomes central to the repeated demand that Pharaoh release Israel from bondage.
Sense to celebrate a feast, hold a festival
Definition To observe or celebrate a pilgrimage feast or festival.
References Exodus 5:1
Lexicon to celebrate a feast, hold a festival
Why it matters The Exodus demand is explicitly worship-centered; Israel is to be released for covenant celebration before the Lord.
Sense to hear, listen, obey
Definition To hear with the sense of heeding or obeying.
References Exodus 5:2
Lexicon to hear, listen, obey
Why it matters Pharaoh refuses to listen to the Lord’s voice, making His rebellion explicit.
Sense the God of the Hebrews
Definition The God identified with the Hebrew people.
References Exodus 5:3
Lexicon the God of the Hebrews
Why it matters Moses and Aaron identify the Lord as the God who has met with His oppressed people and commands their worship.
Sense to sacrifice, slaughter for offering
Definition To offer a sacrifice.
References Exodus 5:3
Lexicon to sacrifice, slaughter for offering
Why it matters The request for sacrifice clarifies that release from bondage is ordered toward worshipful offering to the Lord.
Sense burdens, forced labor
Definition Heavy labor or burdens imposed on someone.
References Exodus 5:4-5
Lexicon burdens, forced labor
Why it matters Pharaoh’s system is defined by oppressive burdens, which the Lord intends to break.
Sense work, service, labor, bondage
Definition Service or labor, here oppressive forced labor under Pharaoh.
References Exodus 5:9, 11, 18
Lexicon work, service, labor, bondage
Why it matters The contrast between serving Pharaoh and serving the Lord becomes one of Exodus’s controlling theological tensions.
Sense straw
Definition Straw used as a material in brickmaking.
References Exodus 5:7, 10-12
Lexicon straw
Why it matters The removal of straw while maintaining quotas becomes Pharaoh’s method of intensified oppression.
Sense bricks
Definition Mudbricks used in construction.
References Exodus 5:7-8, 14, 18-19
Lexicon bricks
Why it matters Brickmaking embodies Israel’s harsh bondage and Pharaoh’s oppressive economy.
Sense measure, quota, fixed amount
Definition A prescribed amount or quota.
References Exodus 5:8, 14
Lexicon measure, quota, fixed amount
Why it matters The unchanged quota with reduced resources exposes Pharaoh’s cruelty and injustice.
Sense slack, idle, lazy
Definition To be slack, weak, idle, or relaxed.
References Exodus 5:8, 17
Lexicon slack, idle, lazy
Why it matters Pharaoh weaponizes the accusation of laziness to dismiss Israel’s worship request and justify harsher labor.
Sense false words, lies
Definition Words that are false, deceptive, or empty.
References Exodus 5:9
Lexicon false words, lies
Why it matters Pharaoh calls the Lord’s worship demand falsehood, showing His opposition to God’s word.
Sense to do harm, bring trouble, act badly
Definition To bring harm, trouble, or evil upon someone.
References Exodus 5:22-23
Lexicon to do harm, bring trouble, act badly
Why it matters Moses uses this language in His lament, asking why the Lord has allowed increased trouble after sending Him.
Sense to deliver, rescue, snatch away
Definition To rescue from danger, bondage, or oppression.
References Exodus 5:23
Lexicon to deliver, rescue, snatch away
Why it matters Moses’ final complaint centers on the apparent absence of the promised rescue, preparing for the Lord’s answer in Exodus 6.
Lexicon data: MorphGNT Strong's Dictionary XML (CC0) · Open Scriptures Hebrew Bible (CC BY 4.0) · Open Scriptures Hebrew Lexicon (CC BY 4.0) · STEPBible Data (CC BY 4.0) · Full details
C.F. Keil & F. Delitzsch, Commentary on the Old Testament (1861–91) — public domain
The Lord alone has ultimate claim over His people, and His promise stands even when rebellious powers resist and circumstances worsen.
God’s people must learn not to interpret early opposition as divine failure, but to bring confusion to the Lord and continue trusting His word.
Courage under resistance, worship-centered allegiance, endurance in delayed relief, honest prayer, and discernment against oppressive lordship.
- Identify where obedience has become costly and bring that burden honestly to the Lord.
- Ask whether worship has been treated as central or as an interruption.
- Refuse to measure God’s faithfulness only by immediate relief.
- Pray through confusion before turning it into accusation against others.
- Watch for systems, habits, or fears that claim ownership over what belongs to God.
- Encourage burdened people without promising that relief will always come immediately.
- Remember that opposition may reveal the need for God’s power more clearly.
- The chapter warns against Pharaoh-like arrogance that refuses to know or obey the Lord, against valuing people only for productivity, against interpreting immediate hardship as proof that God has failed, and against turning on God’s servants when obedience brings pressure.
- Assuming Moses failed because Pharaoh refused. - Pharaoh’s refusal was foretold by the Lord. The mission is not failing · the conflict is unfolding exactly in the arena where God will reveal His power.
- Reading Pharaoh’s question as innocent ignorance. - Pharaoh’s 'Who is the Lord?' is defiant refusal to acknowledge and obey the Lord’s authority.
- Reducing the chapter to labor injustice only. - Labor oppression is central, but the deeper conflict concerns the Lord’s claim over His people for worship.
- Treating worship as a minor detail in the Exodus demand. - Worship is the stated purpose of release. Redemption is not mere escape but liberation to serve the Lord.
- Condemning Moses’ prayer as faithless complaint without nuance. - Moses’ prayer is anguished and confused, but He brings His distress to the Lord rather than abandoning Him.
- Assuming obedience always brings immediate relief. - Exodus 5 shows that obedience may first expose deeper resistance and increase pressure before God’s deliverance becomes visible.
- Where am I tempted to ask Pharaoh’s question in a softer form: 'Why should I obey the Lord?'
- Do I treat worship and obedience as central, or as interruptions to productivity and control?
- How do I respond when obedience to God makes circumstances harder before they get better?
- Am I tempted to blame faithful people when pressure exposes the cost of following God?
- Where have I confused delay with divine failure?
- Do I bring my confusion to the Lord in prayer, or do I let it become bitterness?
- What rival lordship tries to claim my time, labor, identity, or allegiance?
- Prepare believers for intensified pressure after obedience.
- Expose the spiritual arrogance behind Pharaoh’s question.
- Protect worship from productivity idolatry.
- Counsel discouraged servants.
- Help sufferers lament faithfully.
- Distinguish divine promise from immediate circumstances.
The people believed and worshiped in Exodus 4, but the next step brings Pharaoh’s retaliation.
The Lord speaks through Moses and Aaron, and Pharaoh responds by rejecting the Lord’s authority.
The promise of deliverance initially results in intensified labor, exposing the cruelty of Pharaoh’s rule.
Pressure fractures Israel’s response as the officers turn against Moses and Aaron.
Moses brings the unresolved crisis back before the Lord, where Exodus 6 will answer with renewed covenant promise.
The Biblical World
Chapter At A Glance
Moses and Aaron declare the Lord’s demand, Pharaoh rejects the Lord’s authority, Israel’s labor is intensified, the people’s officers blame Moses and Aaron, and Moses brings the crisis back to the Lord in anguished prayer.
Exodus 5 shows the covenant conflict between the Lord and Pharaoh. Israel is the Lord’s people, His firstborn son, and therefore Pharaoh has no ultimate claim over them. The demand for release is not rooted in Israel’s preference but in the Lord’s covenant ownership. Pharaoh’s refusal sets Him against the covenant God and prepares for judgment.
Exodus 5 prepares gospel clarity by showing that bondage is not merely unfortunate hardship but rival lordship. Pharaoh claims Israel’s bodies, time, labor, and worship, while the Lord claims them as His people. The first demand for release exposes resistance rather than producing immediate freedom. This anticipates the deeper gospel reality that sinners cannot negotiate their way out of bondage.
Redemption requires God’s mighty action. In Christ, God confronts the deeper tyrannies of sin, death, and Satan, and redeems His people not merely for relief but for worshipful service to Him.
Courage under resistance, worship-centered allegiance, endurance in delayed relief, honest prayer, and discernment against oppressive lordship.
Focus Points
- The Lord’s authority over Pharaoh
- Worship as the goal of redemption
- Pharaoh’s rebellion and ignorance of the Lord
- Oppression as rival lordship
- The burden of obedience under resistance
- Lament in the face of delayed deliverance
- The conflict between serving Pharaoh and serving the Lord
- The Lord’s claim over His people
- Worship versus bondage
- Pharaoh’s ignorance of God
- Oppression’s strategy
- Obedience and worsening circumstances
- Lament before God
- The word of God against imperial power
- Divine Lordship
- Human Rebellion
- Worship
- Oppression
- Providence
- Prayer and Lament
- Redemption
Cross References
Passages
Chapter opening: Exodus 5:1-9
When the elders of Israel had listened with gladness and gratitude to the communications of Moses and Aaron respecting the revelation which Moses had received from Jehovah , that He was now about to deliver His people out of their bondage in Egypt; Moses and Aaron proceeded to Pharaoh, and requested in the name of the God of Israel, that he would let the people of Israel go and celebrate a festival in the wilderness in honour of their God. When we consider that every nation presented sacrifices to its deities, and celebrated festivals in their honour, and that they had all their own modes of worship, which were supposed to be appointed by the gods themselves, so that a god could not be worshipped acceptably in every place; the demand presented to Pharaoh on the part of the God of the Israelites, that he would let His people go into the wilderness and sacrifice to Him, appears so natural and reasonable, that Pharaoh could not have refused their request, if there had been a single trace of the fear of God in his heart.
But what was his answer? “ Who is Jehovah, that I should listen to His voice, to let Israel go? I know not Jehovah . ” There was a certain truth in these last words. The God of Israel had not yet made Himself known to him. But this was no justification. Although as a heathen he might naturally measure the power of the God by the existing condition of His people, and infer from the impotence of the Israelites that their God must be also weak, he would not have dared to refuse the petition of the Israelites, to be allowed to sacrifice to their God or celebrate a sacrificial festival, if he had had any faith in gods at all.
When the elders of Israel had listened with gladness and gratitude to the communications of Moses and Aaron respecting the revelation which Moses had received from Jehovah , that He was now about to deliver His people out of their bondage in Egypt; Moses and Aaron proceeded to Pharaoh, and requested in the name of the God of Israel, that he would let the people of Israel go and celebrate a festival in the wilderness in honour of their God. When we consider that every nation presented sacrifices to its deities, and celebrated festivals in their honour, and that they had all their own modes of worship, which were supposed to be appointed by the gods themselves, so that a god could not be worshipped acceptably in every place; the demand presented to Pharaoh on the part of the God of the Israelites, that he would let His people go into the wilderness and sacrifice to Him, appears so natural and reasonable, that Pharaoh could not have refused their request, if there had been a single trace of the fear of God in his heart.
But what was his answer? “ Who is Jehovah, that I should listen to His voice, to let Israel go? I know not Jehovah . ” There was a certain truth in these last words. The God of Israel had not yet made Himself known to him. But this was no justification. Although as a heathen he might naturally measure the power of the God by the existing condition of His people, and infer from the impotence of the Israelites that their God must be also weak, he would not have dared to refuse the petition of the Israelites, to be allowed to sacrifice to their God or celebrate a sacrificial festival, if he had had any faith in gods at all.
Exo 5:3 The messengers founded their request upon the fact that the God of the Hebrews had met them (נקרא, vid. , Exo 3:18), and referred to the punishment which the neglect of the sacrificial festival demanded by God might bring upon the nation. פּן־יפגּענוּ: “ lest He strike us (attack us) with pestilence or sword . ” פּגע: to strike, hit against any one, either by accident or with a hostile intent; ordinarily construed with בּ, also with an accusative, 1Sa 10:5, and chosen here probably with reference to נקרא = נקרה.
“ Pestilence or sword: ” these are mentioned as expressive of a violent death, and as the means employed by the deities, according to the ordinary belief of the nations, to punish the neglect of their worship. The expression “God of the Hebrews,” for “God of Israel” (Exo 5:1), is not chosen as being “more intelligible to the king, because the Israelites were called Hebrews by foreigners, more especially by the Egyptians (Exo 1:16; Exo 2:6),” as Knobel supposes, but to convince Pharaoh of the necessity for their going into the desert to keep the festival demanded by their God.
In Egypt they might sacrifice to the gods of Egypt, but not to the God of the Hebrews.
Exo 5:4-5 But Pharaoh would hear nothing of any worship. He believed that the wish was simply an excuse for procuring holidays for the people, or days of rest from their labours, and ordered the messengers off to their slave duties: “ Get you unto your burdens . ” For as the people were very numerous, he would necessarily lose by their keeping holiday. He called the Israelites “ the people of the land, ” not “as being his own property, because he was the lord of the land” ( Baumgarten ), but as the working class, “land-people,” equivalent to “common people,” in distinction from the ruling castes of the Egyptians (vid.
, Jer 52:25 : Eze 7:27).
Exo 5:4-5 But Pharaoh would hear nothing of any worship. He believed that the wish was simply an excuse for procuring holidays for the people, or days of rest from their labours, and ordered the messengers off to their slave duties: “ Get you unto your burdens . ” For as the people were very numerous, he would necessarily lose by their keeping holiday. He called the Israelites “ the people of the land, ” not “as being his own property, because he was the lord of the land” ( Baumgarten ), but as the working class, “land-people,” equivalent to “common people,” in distinction from the ruling castes of the Egyptians (vid.
, Jer 52:25 : Eze 7:27).
Exo 5:6-8 As Pharaoh possessed neither fear of God (εὐσέβεια) nor fear of the gods, but, in the proud security of his might, determined to keep the Israelites as slaves, and to use them as tools for the glorifying of his kingdom by the erection of magnificent buildings, he suspected that their wish to go into the desert was nothing but an excuse invented by idlers, and prompted by a thirst for freedom, which might become dangerous to his kingdom, on account of the numerical strength of the people. He therefore thought that he could best extinguish such desires and attempts by increasing the oppression and adding to their labours.
For this reason he instructed his bailiffs to abstain from delivering straw to the Israelites who were engaged in making bricks, and to let them gather it for themselves; but yet not to make the least abatement in the number (מתכּנת) to be delivered every day. בּעם הנּגשׂים, “ those who urged the people on, ” were the bailiffs selected from the Egyptians and placed over the Israelitish workmen, the general managers of the work.
Under them there were the שׁטרים (lit. , writers, γραμματεῖς lxx, from שׁטר to write), who were chosen from the Israelites (vid. , Exo 5:14), and had to distribute the work among the people, and hand it over, when finished, to the royal officers. לבנים לבן: to make bricks, not to burn them; for the bricks in the ancient monuments of Egypt, and in many of the pyramids, are not burnt but dried in the sun ( Herod .
ii. 136; Hengst . Egypt and Books of Moses, pp. 2 and 79ff.) קשׁשׁ: a denom . verb from קשׁ, to gather stubble, then to stubble, to gather (Num 15:32-33). תּבן, of uncertain etymology, is chopped straw; here, the stubble that was left standing when the corn was reaped, or the straw that lay upon the ground. This they chopped up and mixed with the clay, to give greater durability to the bricks, as may be seen in bricks found in the oldest monuments (cf.
Hgst . p. 79).
Exo 5:6-8 As Pharaoh possessed neither fear of God (εὐσέβεια) nor fear of the gods, but, in the proud security of his might, determined to keep the Israelites as slaves, and to use them as tools for the glorifying of his kingdom by the erection of magnificent buildings, he suspected that their wish to go into the desert was nothing but an excuse invented by idlers, and prompted by a thirst for freedom, which might become dangerous to his kingdom, on account of the numerical strength of the people. He therefore thought that he could best extinguish such desires and attempts by increasing the oppression and adding to their labours.
For this reason he instructed his bailiffs to abstain from delivering straw to the Israelites who were engaged in making bricks, and to let them gather it for themselves; but yet not to make the least abatement in the number (מתכּנת) to be delivered every day. בּעם הנּגשׂים, “ those who urged the people on, ” were the bailiffs selected from the Egyptians and placed over the Israelitish workmen, the general managers of the work.
Under them there were the שׁטרים (lit. , writers, γραμματεῖς lxx, from שׁטר to write), who were chosen from the Israelites (vid. , Exo 5:14), and had to distribute the work among the people, and hand it over, when finished, to the royal officers. לבנים לבן: to make bricks, not to burn them; for the bricks in the ancient monuments of Egypt, and in many of the pyramids, are not burnt but dried in the sun ( Herod .
ii. 136; Hengst . Egypt and Books of Moses, pp. 2 and 79ff.) קשׁשׁ: a denom . verb from קשׁ, to gather stubble, then to stubble, to gather (Num 15:32-33). תּבן, of uncertain etymology, is chopped straw; here, the stubble that was left standing when the corn was reaped, or the straw that lay upon the ground. This they chopped up and mixed with the clay, to give greater durability to the bricks, as may be seen in bricks found in the oldest monuments (cf.
Hgst . p. 79).
Exo 5:6-8 As Pharaoh possessed neither fear of God (εὐσέβεια) nor fear of the gods, but, in the proud security of his might, determined to keep the Israelites as slaves, and to use them as tools for the glorifying of his kingdom by the erection of magnificent buildings, he suspected that their wish to go into the desert was nothing but an excuse invented by idlers, and prompted by a thirst for freedom, which might become dangerous to his kingdom, on account of the numerical strength of the people. He therefore thought that he could best extinguish such desires and attempts by increasing the oppression and adding to their labours.
For this reason he instructed his bailiffs to abstain from delivering straw to the Israelites who were engaged in making bricks, and to let them gather it for themselves; but yet not to make the least abatement in the number (מתכּנת) to be delivered every day. בּעם הנּגשׂים, “ those who urged the people on, ” were the bailiffs selected from the Egyptians and placed over the Israelitish workmen, the general managers of the work.
Under them there were the שׁטרים (lit. , writers, γραμματεῖς lxx, from שׁטר to write), who were chosen from the Israelites (vid. , Exo 5:14), and had to distribute the work among the people, and hand it over, when finished, to the royal officers. לבנים לבן: to make bricks, not to burn them; for the bricks in the ancient monuments of Egypt, and in many of the pyramids, are not burnt but dried in the sun ( Herod .
ii. 136; Hengst . Egypt and Books of Moses, pp. 2 and 79ff.) קשׁשׁ: a denom . verb from קשׁ, to gather stubble, then to stubble, to gather (Num 15:32-33). תּבן, of uncertain etymology, is chopped straw; here, the stubble that was left standing when the corn was reaped, or the straw that lay upon the ground. This they chopped up and mixed with the clay, to give greater durability to the bricks, as may be seen in bricks found in the oldest monuments (cf.
Hgst . p. 79).
Exo 5:9-11 “ Let the work be heavy (press heavily) upon the people, and they shall make with it (i. e. , stick to their work), and not look at lying words . ” By “lying words” the king meant the words of Moses, that the God of Israel had appeared to him, and demanded a sacrificial festival from His people. In Exo 5:11 special emphasis is laid upon אתּם “ ye: ” “ Go, ye yourselves, fetch your straw, ” not others for you as heretofore; “ for nothing is taken (diminished) from your work .
” The word כּי for has been correctly explained by Kimchi as supposing a parenthetical thought, et quidem alacriter vobis eundum est .
Exo 5:9-11 “ Let the work be heavy (press heavily) upon the people, and they shall make with it (i. e. , stick to their work), and not look at lying words . ” By “lying words” the king meant the words of Moses, that the God of Israel had appeared to him, and demanded a sacrificial festival from His people. In Exo 5:11 special emphasis is laid upon אתּם “ ye: ” “ Go, ye yourselves, fetch your straw, ” not others for you as heretofore; “ for nothing is taken (diminished) from your work .
” The word כּי for has been correctly explained by Kimchi as supposing a parenthetical thought, et quidem alacriter vobis eundum est .
Exo 5:9-11 “ Let the work be heavy (press heavily) upon the people, and they shall make with it (i. e. , stick to their work), and not look at lying words . ” By “lying words” the king meant the words of Moses, that the God of Israel had appeared to him, and demanded a sacrificial festival from His people. In Exo 5:11 special emphasis is laid upon אתּם “ ye: ” “ Go, ye yourselves, fetch your straw, ” not others for you as heretofore; “ for nothing is taken (diminished) from your work .
” The word כּי for has been correctly explained by Kimchi as supposing a parenthetical thought, et quidem alacriter vobis eundum est .
Exo 5:12 ק לקשׁשׁ: “to gather stubble for straw;” not “stubble for , in the sense of instead of straw,” for ל is not equivalent to תּחת but to gather the stubble left in the fields for the chopped straw required for the bricks.
Exo 5:13 בּיומו יום דּבר, the quantity fixed for every day, “ just as when the straw was (there),” i.e., was given out for the work.
Exo 5:14-18 As the Israelites could not do the work appointed them, their overlookers were beaten by the Egyptian bailiffs; and when they complained to the king of this treatment, they were repulsed with harshness, and told “ Ye are idle, idle; therefore ye say, Let us go and sacrifice to Jehovah . ” עמּך וחטאת: “ and thy people sin; ” i. e. , not “thy people (the Israelites) must be sinners,” which might be the meaning of חטא according to Gen 43:9, but “thy (Egyptian) people sin.
” “ Thy people ” must be understood as applying to the Egyptians, on account of the antithesis to “thy servants,” which not only refers to the Israelitish overlookers, but includes all the Israelites, especially in the first clause. חטאת is an unusual feminine form, for חטאה (vid. , Gen 33:11); and עם is construed as a feminine, as in Jdg 18:7 and Jer 8:5.
Exo 5:14-18 As the Israelites could not do the work appointed them, their overlookers were beaten by the Egyptian bailiffs; and when they complained to the king of this treatment, they were repulsed with harshness, and told “ Ye are idle, idle; therefore ye say, Let us go and sacrifice to Jehovah . ” עמּך וחטאת: “ and thy people sin; ” i. e. , not “thy people (the Israelites) must be sinners,” which might be the meaning of חטא according to Gen 43:9, but “thy (Egyptian) people sin.
” “ Thy people ” must be understood as applying to the Egyptians, on account of the antithesis to “thy servants,” which not only refers to the Israelitish overlookers, but includes all the Israelites, especially in the first clause. חטאת is an unusual feminine form, for חטאה (vid. , Gen 33:11); and עם is construed as a feminine, as in Jdg 18:7 and Jer 8:5.
Exo 5:14-18 As the Israelites could not do the work appointed them, their overlookers were beaten by the Egyptian bailiffs; and when they complained to the king of this treatment, they were repulsed with harshness, and told “ Ye are idle, idle; therefore ye say, Let us go and sacrifice to Jehovah . ” עמּך וחטאת: “ and thy people sin; ” i. e. , not “thy people (the Israelites) must be sinners,” which might be the meaning of חטא according to Gen 43:9, but “thy (Egyptian) people sin.
” “ Thy people ” must be understood as applying to the Egyptians, on account of the antithesis to “thy servants,” which not only refers to the Israelitish overlookers, but includes all the Israelites, especially in the first clause. חטאת is an unusual feminine form, for חטאה (vid. , Gen 33:11); and עם is construed as a feminine, as in Jdg 18:7 and Jer 8:5.
Exo 5:14-18 As the Israelites could not do the work appointed them, their overlookers were beaten by the Egyptian bailiffs; and when they complained to the king of this treatment, they were repulsed with harshness, and told “ Ye are idle, idle; therefore ye say, Let us go and sacrifice to Jehovah . ” עמּך וחטאת: “ and thy people sin; ” i. e. , not “thy people (the Israelites) must be sinners,” which might be the meaning of חטא according to Gen 43:9, but “thy (Egyptian) people sin.
” “ Thy people ” must be understood as applying to the Egyptians, on account of the antithesis to “thy servants,” which not only refers to the Israelitish overlookers, but includes all the Israelites, especially in the first clause. חטאת is an unusual feminine form, for חטאה (vid. , Gen 33:11); and עם is construed as a feminine, as in Jdg 18:7 and Jer 8:5.
Exo 5:14-18 As the Israelites could not do the work appointed them, their overlookers were beaten by the Egyptian bailiffs; and when they complained to the king of this treatment, they were repulsed with harshness, and told “ Ye are idle, idle; therefore ye say, Let us go and sacrifice to Jehovah . ” עמּך וחטאת: “ and thy people sin; ” i. e. , not “thy people (the Israelites) must be sinners,” which might be the meaning of חטא according to Gen 43:9, but “thy (Egyptian) people sin.
” “ Thy people ” must be understood as applying to the Egyptians, on account of the antithesis to “thy servants,” which not only refers to the Israelitish overlookers, but includes all the Israelites, especially in the first clause. חטאת is an unusual feminine form, for חטאה (vid. , Gen 33:11); and עם is construed as a feminine, as in Jdg 18:7 and Jer 8:5.
Exo 5:19-20 When the Israelitish overlookers saw that they were in evil (בּרע as in Psa 10:6, i.e., in an evil condition), they came to meet Moses and Aaron, waiting for them as they came out from the king, and reproaching them with only making the circumstances of the people worse.
Exo 5:19-20 When the Israelitish overlookers saw that they were in evil (בּרע as in Psa 10:6, i.e., in an evil condition), they came to meet Moses and Aaron, waiting for them as they came out from the king, and reproaching them with only making the circumstances of the people worse.
Exo 5:21-23 “ Jehovah look upon you and judge ” (i. e. , punish you, because) “ ye have made the smell of us to stink in the eyes of Pharaoh and his servants, ” i. e. , destroyed our good name with the king and his servants, and turned it into hatred and disgust. ריח, a pleasant smell, is a figure employed for a good name or repute, and the figurative use of the word explains the connection with the eyes instead of the nose.
“ To give a sword into their hand to kill us. ” Moses and Aaron, they imagined, through their appeal to Pharaoh had made the king and his counsellors suspect them of being restless people, and so had put a weapon into their hands for their oppression and destruction. What perversity of the natural heart! They call upon God to judge, whilst by their very complaining they show that they have no confidence in God and His power to save.
Moses turned (ויּשׁב Exo 5:22) to Jehovah with the question, “ Why hast Thou done evil to this people, ” - increased their oppression by my mission to Pharaoh, and yet not delivered them? “These are not words of contumacy or indignation, but of inquiry and prayer” ( Aug. quaest. 14). The question and complaint proceeded from faith, which flies to God when it cannot understand the dealings of God, to point out to Him how incomprehensible are His ways, to appeal to Him to help in the time of need, and to remove what seems opposed to His nature and His will.
Exo 5:21-23 “ Jehovah look upon you and judge ” (i. e. , punish you, because) “ ye have made the smell of us to stink in the eyes of Pharaoh and his servants, ” i. e. , destroyed our good name with the king and his servants, and turned it into hatred and disgust. ריח, a pleasant smell, is a figure employed for a good name or repute, and the figurative use of the word explains the connection with the eyes instead of the nose.
“ To give a sword into their hand to kill us. ” Moses and Aaron, they imagined, through their appeal to Pharaoh had made the king and his counsellors suspect them of being restless people, and so had put a weapon into their hands for their oppression and destruction. What perversity of the natural heart! They call upon God to judge, whilst by their very complaining they show that they have no confidence in God and His power to save.
Moses turned (ויּשׁב Exo 5:22) to Jehovah with the question, “ Why hast Thou done evil to this people, ” - increased their oppression by my mission to Pharaoh, and yet not delivered them? “These are not words of contumacy or indignation, but of inquiry and prayer” ( Aug. quaest. 14). The question and complaint proceeded from faith, which flies to God when it cannot understand the dealings of God, to point out to Him how incomprehensible are His ways, to appeal to Him to help in the time of need, and to remove what seems opposed to His nature and His will.