Moses, mediating Yahweh's covenant instruction to Israel within the Torah.
Sabbath for the Land, Jubilee Release, and the Lord's Ownership of Israel
Because the land and the Israelites belong to the Lord, Israel must structure land, labor, debt, poverty, redemption, and release around Sabbath trust, Jubilee restoration, and exodus-shaped mercy.
Reading a chapter
What this page is: Each chapter page shows the big idea, the argument flow, key original-language terms, doctrine connections, and passage units, all in one place.
How to use it: Start with the Overview tab to get the chapter's main point. Then move to Passages to study individual units, or Language to trace key terms.
Going deeper: The Doctrines and Motifs tabs show how this chapter connects to the broader biblical story.
Because the land and the Israelites belong to the Lord, Israel must structure land, labor, debt, poverty, redemption, and release around Sabbath trust, Jubilee restoration, and exodus-shaped mercy.
Leviticus 25 teaches that holiness reaches into land economics and social structures. The land must rest because it belongs to the Lord. Family inheritance must be restored because Israel's land tenure is covenant stewardship, not absolute ownership. The poor must be supported because the Lord redeemed Israel from Egypt. Interest exploitation is forbidden because poverty must not become opportunity for gain.
Israelites must not be enslaved permanently because they are already the Lord's servants. Jubilee proclaims that Israel's economic life must periodically reset around divine ownership, redemption, mercy, and release.
The whole covenant community of Israel, especially landholders, clan leaders, poor Israelites, hired workers, creditors, kinsman-redeemers, resident foreigners, servants, and those who will live in the land the Lord gives.
Leviticus 25 follows Leviticus 23's appointed times and Leviticus 24's continual sanctuary signs and justice case. The focus now expands Sabbath holiness into the land, economy, inheritance, debt, slavery, and social restoration. The setting is anticipatory: these commands are to be practiced when Israel enters the land the Lord is giving them.
Because the land and the Israelites belong to the Lord, Israel must structure land, labor, debt, poverty, redemption, and release around Sabbath trust, Jubilee restoration, and exodus-shaped mercy.
Moses, mediating Yahweh's covenant instruction to Israel within the Torah.
The whole covenant community of Israel, especially landholders, clan leaders, poor Israelites, hired workers, creditors, kinsman-redeemers, resident foreigners, servants, and those who will live in the land the Lord gives.
Leviticus 25 follows Leviticus 23's appointed times and Leviticus 24's continual sanctuary signs and justice case. The focus now expands Sabbath holiness into the land, economy, inheritance, debt, slavery, and social restoration. The setting is anticipatory: these commands are to be practiced when Israel enters the land the Lord is giving them.
- Israel will be tempted to treat land as absolute private property, productivity as ultimate, poverty as exploitable, debt as permanent bondage, and fellow Israelites as disposable labor. Leviticus 25 confronts all of this by declaring that the land belongs to the Lord and Israel are His servants whom He brought out of Egypt.
Ancient economies often allowed land accumulation, debt servitude, generational poverty, and permanent loss of family inheritance. Leviticus 25 establishes a covenant economy where land rests, debts and servitude are limited, family inheritance is protected, redemption is built into social structures, and Israel's economic life is governed by the Lord's ownership and redemption.
Leviticus 25 stands near the climax of the Holiness Code. It moves from holy priests, holy food, holy offerings, holy time, holy sanctuary signs, and holy justice to holy land economics. It anticipates Israel's life in Canaan and roots social order in exodus redemption. The chapter becomes foundational for biblical themes of Sabbath rest, Jubilee release, kinsman redemption, land theology, poverty mercy, and Christ's proclamation of good news to the poor and freedom for captives.
The Lord speaks to Moses at Mount Sinai and commands that the land itself must observe a Sabbath to the Lord every seventh year. After seven Sabbath years, the fiftieth year is consecrated as Jubilee, announced with the trumpet on the Day of Atonement. Property is returned, liberty is proclaimed, and economic transactions are governed by the number of harvest years remaining until Jubilee.
The chapter then provides laws for trusting the Lord's provision during the Sabbath year, redeeming land, selling houses, protecting Levitical towns, helping poor Israelites, prohibiting interest exploitation, regulating Israelite servitude, and redeeming Israelites sold to resident foreigners. The chapter closes by grounding everything in the exodus: Israelites belong to the Lord as His servants.
Theological exposition and fulfillment
Leviticus 25 clarifies the gospel by showing that humanity needs rest, release, redemption, restored inheritance, and freedom from bondage. The Sabbath year exposes our restless unbelief. Jubilee exposes the tragedy of lost inheritance and permanent captivity. Christ fulfills the redemption trajectory by entering our kinship, paying the redemption price with His blood, releasing us from sin's bondage, and restoring us to the inheritance of God's kingdom. The gospel is the true Jubilee proclamation.
The land must rest every seventh year as a Sabbath to the Lord.
After seven Sabbath cycles, liberty is proclaimed in the fiftieth year.
Land transactions must be calculated by harvest years remaining and must not exploit.
The Lord promises security and abundance when Israel obeys Sabbath-year rhythms.
The land belongs to the Lord, so permanent sale is forbidden and redemption is required.
Family land, city houses, village houses, and Levitical property are regulated according to redemption and Jubilee.
Poor Israelites must be supported without exploitative interest.
Poor Israelites who sell themselves are treated as hired workers and released in Jubilee.
The chapter distinguishes foreign slave acquisition from the treatment of fellow Israelites.
Israelites sold to foreigners retain redemption rights and are released in Jubilee.
- 25:1-7: Every seventh year the land observes a Sabbath, teaching Israel that harvest and land belong to the Lord.
- 25:8-12: After seven Sabbath-year cycles, the fiftieth year is consecrated by trumpet proclamation, release, and return to family property.
- 25:13-17: Economic dealings must account for Jubilee and must not take advantage of fellow Israelites.
- 25:18-22: Israel must trust the Lord to provide enough in the sixth year to sustain them through Sabbath-year rhythms.
- 25:23-24: Israel cannot sell land permanently because they live as foreigners and tenants with the Lord.
- 25:25-34: Land, houses, villages, and Levitical property are governed by redemption and Jubilee restoration.
- 25:35-38: Fellow Israelites in poverty must receive help without interest, so they may continue living among the people.
- 25:39-43: Poor Israelites who sell themselves must be treated as hired workers and released with their children at Jubilee.
- 25:44-46: The chapter permits acquisition of foreign slaves while forbidding ruthless rule over fellow Israelites.
- 25:47-55: Israelites sold to foreigners retain the right of redemption and release because they belong to the Lord.
Sense Sinai
Definition Sinai
References 25:1
Why it matters The chapter is explicitly given at Mount Sinai, grounding land laws in covenant revelation.
Cross-language bridge 2 links · View in lexicon
Pastoral Entry
אֶרֶץ is the Hebrew word that carries one of the broadest freight-loads in all of Scripture. It can mean the earth in its totality — the physical cosmos as created and upheld by God — and it can mean a particular land, a defined territory, a region, or even the ground beneath one's feet. The range is not a weakness. It is a strength, because it means that אֶרֶץ holds together what we tend to separate: cosmic theology and local address, creation and covenant, universal sovereignty and particular promise.
In its widest sense, אֶרֶץ names the created order as the domain of God's lordship. The opening movement of Genesis does not merely describe origins; it establishes ownership. The earth belongs to its Maker. What fills it, what is drawn from it, what walks upon it — all of it exists under the governance of the One who spoke it into being. The earth is not a neutral stage for human history. It is the theater of God's redemptive purposes, and those purposes are inseparable from the ground itself.
In its narrower, partitive sense, אֶרֶץ becomes one of the most theologically loaded terms in the Hebrew Bible. The land — the particular territory sworn to Abraham, promised to his descendants, given to Israel, lost in exile, and longed for in return — is not simply geography. Land in Israel's story is the embodiment of covenant relationship. To be in the land is to dwell under God's blessing. To be cast out of the land is to experience the weight of covenant failure. To return to the land is to taste the mercy of God who keeps his promises beyond the reach of human faithlessness.
For the pastor and teacher, the word does something that no English gloss fully achieves. It holds cosmic and covenantal together in a single term. When the Psalms invite all the earth to worship, and when Deuteronomy warns Israel about the land they are about to enter, the same word is doing both kinds of work. Recognizing this prevents the common error of flattening every אֶרֶץ into either pure cosmology or pure geography. Context must govern. But both dimensions belong to the theology the word carries.
Sense land, earth
Definition land, earth
References 25:2, 25:4-7, 25:10, 25:12, 25:18-19, 25:23-24, 25:38
Why it matters The land is central to the chapter and belongs ultimately to the Lord.
Sense to cease, rest
Definition to cease, rest
References 25:2
Why it matters The land must cease from ordinary production and observe rest.
Sense Sabbath, rest
Definition Sabbath, rest
References 25:2, 25:4, 25:6, 25:8
Why it matters The Sabbath principle governs the land and the seven-year cycles.
Cross-language bridge 1 link · View in lexicon
Sense to sow
Definition to sow
References 25:3-4, 25:11, 25:20
Why it matters Sowing is permitted six years but prohibited in Sabbath and Jubilee years.
Sense vineyard
Definition vineyard
References 25:3-4
Why it matters Vineyards are pruned for six years but rest in the seventh year.
Sense to prune
Definition to prune
References 25:3-4
Why it matters Pruning vineyards is part of ordinary work suspended in the Sabbath year.
Sense produce, yield, harvest
Definition produce, yield, harvest
References 25:3, 25:7, 25:12, 25:15-16, 25:20-22
Why it matters Produce and harvest years determine Sabbath provision and Jubilee valuation.
Sense seventh
Definition seventh
References 25:4, 25:20
Why it matters The seventh year is a Sabbath of complete rest for the land.
Sense complete rest, solemn rest
Definition complete rest, solemn rest
References 25:4-5
Why it matters The land's Sabbath year is described as complete rest.
Cross-language bridge 1 link · View in lexicon
Sense harvest
Definition harvest
References 25:5
Why it matters The self-grown harvest may not be gathered as a normal crop in the Sabbath year.
Sense untrimmed, consecrated growth
Definition untrimmed, consecrated growth
References 25:5, 25:11
Why it matters Untrimmed vines in Sabbath and Jubilee years are not harvested as ordinary production.
Pastoral Entry
עֶבֶד (eved) is a Hebrew noun for a servant or slave, a dependent household worker, a royal subordinate, or a person described in service to God. Genesis 24:2 uses it for Abraham's senior household servant, while Exodus 21:2 uses it for a Hebrew enslaved man. English servant can be suitable in some relationships and dangerously soft in others. Readers must attend to ownership, freedom, vulnerability, duration, legal protection, and power rather than choosing a comforting gloss in advance.
The Hebrew Bible can use eved as an honored covenant title. Deuteronomy 34:5 calls Moses the servant of the Lord, Second Samuel 7:5 applies “my servant” to David, and Isaiah 41:8 calls Israel God's servant. Psalm 116:16 uses servant language in prayerful allegiance. The honor comes from belonging to and being commissioned by the Lord, not from a claim that all human servitude is dignified or harmless. Jeremiah 27:6 can even call Nebuchadnezzar God's servant as an instrument of judgment without endorsing the king's character or empire as morally exemplary.
Isaiah's servant language must be followed passage by passage. Israel is explicitly named as servant in Isaiah 41:8 and 49:3, while Isaiah 42:1 presents a chosen servant with a justice-bearing mission and Isaiah 52:13 through 53:11 portrays the servant's suffering, vindication, and work for many. Christian interpretation receives these songs in relation to Jesus, but the lexical noun alone does not erase Israel, make every servant text messianic, or settle every debated question about the songs' referent.
Sense servant, slave
Definition servant, slave
References 25:6, 25:39, 25:42, 25:44, 25:55
Why it matters Servitude is central to the chapter, especially the claim that Israelites are the Lord's servants.
Sense female servant, slave woman
Definition female servant, slave woman
References 25:6, 25:44
Why it matters Female servants are included in Sabbath-year provision and foreign slave regulations.
Sense hired worker
Definition hired worker
References 25:6, 25:40, 25:50, 25:53
Why it matters Poor Israelites in service are to be treated as hired workers, not slaves.
Sense temporary resident, sojourner
Definition temporary resident, sojourner
References 25:6, 25:23, 25:35, 25:40, 25:45, 25:47
Why it matters Temporary residents appear in provision, identity, poverty support, and servitude contexts.
Sense animal, livestock
Definition animal, livestock
References 25:7
Why it matters Livestock may eat what the land produces in the Sabbath year.
Cross-language bridge 1 link · View in lexicon
Pastoral Entry
חַי describes what is living or alive and can also mark what is fresh, flowing, or vigorous. Its wide range includes living creatures, raw flesh, running water, continuing life, and the covenant title “the living God.” The local index currently counts about 503 occurrences, so no single theological gloss governs every use. Context determines whether the adjective identifies biological life, freshness, duration, or a title for God.
When Scripture calls the Lord “the living God,” the title often carries covenantal or polemical force. Deuteronomy 5:26 emphasizes that Israel heard the living God speak; Joshua 3:10 grounds confidence in God’s active presence; Jeremiah 10:10 contrasts the Lord with manufactured idols; and Daniel 6:20 asks whether Daniel’s God can deliver. These passages reveal the God who speaks and acts, but that force arises from each context rather than from an expanded dictionary definition of the adjective.
The phrase “living water” likewise depends on context. In ritual texts it commonly means fresh or running water. Jeremiah 2:13 applies the image to the Lord as the fountain his people forsook for broken cisterns. Teachers can trace that prophetic image toward the New Testament’s living-water language while preserving Jeremiah’s covenant indictment and distinguishing it from ordinary or ritual uses.
Pastorally, חַי helps teachers contrast trust in the living God with dependence on powerless substitutes and helps lamenting believers voice their thirst for God, as in Psalms 42 and 84. The application should arise from those passages without implying that every H2416 occurrence carries the full theology of divine life.
Sense living creature, wild animal
Definition living creature, wild animal
References 25:7
Why it matters Wild animals share in the provision of the land's Sabbath growth.
Cross-language bridge 1 link · View in lexicon
Sense to count
Definition to count
References 25:8
Why it matters Israel must count seven Sabbath years to reach Jubilee.
Sense seven
Definition seven
References 25:8
Why it matters Seven Sabbath cycles structure the count toward Jubilee.
Sense blast, shout, trumpet blast
Definition blast, shout, trumpet blast
References 25:9
Why it matters The trumpet blast announces Jubilee throughout the land.
Sense ram's horn, trumpet
Definition ram's horn, trumpet
References 25:9
Why it matters The shofar is sounded on the Day of Atonement to proclaim Jubilee.
Sense atonements
Definition atonements
References 25:9
Why it matters The Jubilee trumpet is sounded on the Day of Atonement.
Pastoral Entry
קָדַשׁ (qādaš) means to be holy, sanctify, consecrate, set apart, prepare, or treat as holy. God sanctifies the seventh day in Genesis 2:3, claims Israel's firstborn, consecrates priests and sanctuary objects, and gives the Sabbath as a sign that he sanctifies his people. People may consecrate themselves, dedicate property, observe holy time, or acknowledge God as holy. Agent, object, and verbal stem determine who acts and what changes.
Consecration does not mean that every object becomes morally virtuous or every appointed person becomes sinless. Exodus and Leviticus set apart priests, garments, altars, food, and time for defined purposes. Numbers 20:12 says Moses and Aaron failed to uphold God as holy before Israel, showing that office and prior consecration do not remove accountability. Ezekiel 36:23 promises that God will vindicate the holiness of his profaned name among the nations through his own action.
Some prophetic texts use the same verb idiomatically for preparing war: Jeremiah 6:4 and Joel 3:9 call armies to consecrate or prepare battle. The wording reports mobilization and does not make the violence morally sacred. Other texts consecrate a fast or assembly, emphasizing preparation for communal worship and repentance. Modern claims of holy war, holy leadership, or consecrated bodies require independent moral and textual warrant; H6942 cannot supply it by itself.
Sense to consecrate, sanctify
Definition to consecrate, sanctify
References 25:10, 25:12
Why it matters The fiftieth year is consecrated as holy.
Sense liberty, release
Definition liberty, release
References 25:10
Why it matters Jubilee proclaims liberty throughout the land.
Sense possession, property, inheritance holding
Definition possession, property, inheritance holding
References 25:10, 25:13, 25:24-28, 25:32-34, 25:41, 25:45-46
Why it matters Family property and inherited possession are protected through Jubilee and redemption.
Pastoral Entry
שׁוּב (shuv) is a common Hebrew verb for turning, returning, going back, bringing back, or restoring. Many occurrences describe ordinary movement, so the verb does not mean repentance every time it appears. In covenant and prophetic settings, however, returning to the Lord becomes a rich description of repentance: people turn from wicked ways, return to God, hear His voice, and seek His mercy.
Other stem forms can describe causing someone or something to return, including God's restoration of His people. Deuteronomy 30 joins Israel's return to the Lord with God's gathering and renewal after judgment. Isaiah 55 calls the wicked to forsake a way and return to the compassionate God. Hosea and Zechariah address a covenant people whose return must be truthful rather than merely verbal.
Christian teaching can connect this movement with New Testament calls to repent and turn to God, but the Hebrew verb itself should not be collapsed into one technical doctrine. Pastoral use must also distinguish return to God from pressure to return to an unsafe person, place, leader, or institution.
Sense to return
Definition to return
References 25:10, 25:13, 25:27-28, 25:41, 25:51-52
Why it matters Return to property, clan, and inheritance is central to Jubilee.
Sense family, clan
Definition family, clan
References 25:10, 25:41, 25:47, 25:49
Why it matters Jubilee restores persons to family and clan belonging.
Sense Jubilee, ram's horn
Definition Jubilee, ram's horn
References 25:10-13, 25:15, 25:28, 25:30-31, 25:33, 25:40, 25:50, 25:52, 25:54
Why it matters The Jubilee year proclaims release, return, and property restoration.
Sense neighbor, fellow, associate
Definition neighbor, fellow, associate
References 25:14-15, 25:17
Why it matters Economic dealings with fellow Israelites must not exploit.
Sense to oppress, mistreat, take advantage
Definition to oppress, mistreat, take advantage
References 25:14, 25:17
Why it matters Israel must not take advantage of one another in transactions.
Cross-language bridge 1 link · View in lexicon
Pastoral Entry
קָנָה (qanah) means to acquire, buy, possess, obtain, create, or form. Abraham buys burial land, Jacob purchases a parcel, Jeremiah buys a field as a sign of future restoration, and Ruth 4 records a public redemption transaction. Proverbs urges hearers to acquire wisdom and truth, using economic language for costly commitment rather than suggesting that insight is available only to the wealthy.
The verb can describe God's relation to creation and people. Melchizedek blesses God as qanah of heaven and earth, translated Creator or Possessor according to how the construction is understood. Exodus 15:16 and Psalm 74:2 speak of the people God acquired, while Psalm 139:13 uses the verb for God's forming relation to the psalmist's inward parts. Divine possession communicates creation, covenant claim, and care; it does not license human owners to imitate absolute ownership over other people.
Ancient purchase texts include land, goods, debt, and human beings. Genesis 39:1 reports Joseph being bought, Genesis 47 describes Pharaoh acquiring land and labor during famine, Leviticus regulates purchased servants, and Amos 8:6 condemns buying the poor for silver. The verb reports these systems without declaring every transaction just. Proverbs 8:22 is also disputed: qanah may be rendered acquired, possessed, created, or brought forth in wisdom's poem. That verse alone must not settle the doctrine of Christ or the eternal relation of the Son.
Sense to buy, acquire
Definition to buy, acquire
References 25:14-15, 25:28, 25:30, 25:44-45, 25:50
Why it matters Buying is regulated by Jubilee, redemption, and the number of harvest years.
Sense to sell
Definition to sell
References 25:14-16, 25:23, 25:25, 25:27, 25:29, 25:34, 25:39, 25:42, 25:47-48, 25:50
Why it matters Selling land or oneself is regulated to prevent permanent loss and exploitation.
Pastoral Entry
יָרֵא (yare) is the Hebrew verb for fearing, being afraid, or standing in reverence. Its sense depends on the object and setting: it can describe ordinary fear, dread before danger, or reverent fear of God. The local Hebrew index currently counts about 329 H3372 occurrences in the OT.
Genesis 22:12 uses the verb when the angel tells Abraham, 'now I know that you fear God, since you have not withheld your son, your only son, from me.' In this scene Abraham's fear of God is demonstrated through costly obedience during the test. The verse does not reduce fear of God to this single action, but it joins reverence and obedience closely.
Deuteronomy 10:12 places fearing the Lord alongside walking in his ways, loving him, serving him wholeheartedly, and keeping his commands. The verb therefore belongs within a full covenant response rather than functioning as a synonym for panic.
Psalm 130:4 uses a passive form of the verb in the confession, 'with you there is forgiveness, so that you may be feared.' Forgiveness does not make reverence unnecessary; in the psalm it provides a reason for God's people to stand in awe of him and hope in his word.
The related noun יִרְאָה (yirah, H3374) carries the fear-of-the-Lord formula in wisdom texts such as Proverbs 1:7 and 9:10. Those related forms illuminate this verb, but they remain distinct lexical identities.
For the preacher, יָרֵא helps distinguish disabling dread from the reverent fear of God that expresses itself in trust and obedience, while allowing each passage to determine the precise sense.
Sense to fear, revere
Definition to fear, revere
References 25:17, 25:36, 25:43
Why it matters Fear of God governs economic fairness, lending, and treatment of servants.
Sense security, safety
Definition security, safety
References 25:18-19
Why it matters Obedience brings secure dwelling in the land.
Sense satisfaction, fullness
Definition satisfaction, fullness
References 25:19
Why it matters The land will yield enough for Israel to eat their fill.
Pastoral Entry
צָוָה (tsavah) means to command, charge, order, direct, or appoint. God commands the human in Genesis 2:16, directs Noah in Genesis 6:22, speaks through Moses, and charges Joshua. Yet human beings also command: Pharaoh orders violence in Exodus 1:22, Joseph directs household and medical work, rulers issue decrees, and Rechabite ancestors give family instructions. The verb reports an act of direction; it does not by itself prove that the speaker is righteous or that the order should be obeyed.
Torah repeatedly uses H6680 for specific covenant instructions. Deuteronomy forbids adding to or subtracting from what God commands, places the words on the heart, and joins obedience with covenant life. Leviticus 10:1 provides an essential boundary by describing worship the Lord had not commanded. The authority, recipient, content, covenant setting, and canonical context must all be identified before applying a command beyond its passage.
Poetry and prophecy widen the settings without erasing those distinctions. Psalm 33:9 describes creation responding to God's command, Psalm 91:11 speaks of angels charged concerning the protected person, and Jeremiah 7:23 recalls the covenant summons to hear God's voice. Jeremiah 14:14 says false prophets spoke what God had not commanded, while Amos 2:12 indicts people who commanded prophets not to prophesy. Command language can therefore expose both faithful authority and coercive suppression.
Sense to command
Definition to command
References 25:21
Why it matters The Lord commands blessing in the sixth year.
Pastoral Entry
בְּרָכָה (berakah) is the Hebrew noun for blessing — the covenant favor of YHWH that speaks and conveys what he gives. The local Hebrew index currently counts about 69 occurrences and is grounded in the Abrahamic covenant: YHWH made Abraham a berakah (Gen 12:2), and through him all the families of the earth would be blessed. From that Abrahamic anchor, the berakah flows through the Mosaic covenant (Deut 28), the priestly blessing (Num 6), the prophetic promises, and the Psalms — and the NT shows it arriving fully in Christ.
Genesis 12:2 gives berakah its Abrahamic foundation: 'I will make you a great nation, and I will bless you and make your name great, so that you will be a berakah.' YHWH's purpose is not merely to bless Abraham but to make him a berakah — a blessing to others, a conduit of the divine favor to all families of the earth (v. 3: 'and in you all the families of the earth shall be blessed'). The berakah is not private: it flows through the recipient to others.
Numbers 6:24-26 gives berakah its priestly form: 'YHWH bless (yevarekh) you and keep you; YHWH make his face shine on you and be gracious to you; YHWH lift up his countenance upon you and give you peace (shalom).' This is the great priestly berakah — the official channel through which YHWH's blessing flows to his people. Three lines, six verbs, one source: YHWH himself places his name on his people through this blessing (v. 27, 'so shall they put my name on the people of Israel, and I will bless them').
Deuteronomy 28:2-3 gives berakah its covenant-obedience form: 'And all these berakot shall come upon you and overtake you, if you obey the voice of YHWH your God. Blessed (baruk) shall you be in the city, and blessed shall you be in the field.' The berakot of Deuteronomy 28 are comprehensive: city and field, fruit and livestock, basket and kneading bowl, going out and coming in (v. 3-6). The covenant berakah is not one category of blessing but the totality of flourishing in every domain of life.
Psalm 3:8 gives berakah its congregational use: 'Salvation belongs to YHWH; your berakah be on your people!' David's psalm in flight from Absalom ends with this request: not just personal salvation but the berakah on all of YHWH's people. The berakah is communal as well as individual — it belongs to the covenant people as a body.
Malachi 3:10 gives berakah its covenant-faithfulness promise: 'Bring the full tithe into the storehouse, that there may be food in my house. And thereby put me to the test, says YHWH of hosts, if I will not open the windows of heaven for you and pour down for you a berakah until there is no more need.' The berakah is the response to covenant faithfulness — YHWH is the source, Israel's obedience is the channel, and the berakah flows according to his covenant purpose.
For the preacher, בְּרָכָה (berakah) gives the congregation the word for what YHWH's favor accomplishes: not just a wish or a feeling but an effective reality. The blessing YHWH pronounces is a berakah — it does what it says.
Sense blessing
Definition blessing
References 25:21
Why it matters The Lord promises a commanded blessing sufficient for Sabbath-year obedience.
Sense permanently, in perpetuity
Definition permanently, in perpetuity
References 25:23, 25:30
Why it matters Land may not be sold permanently because it belongs to the Lord; some city houses become permanent after a year.
Pastoral Entry
גֵּר (ger) is the Hebrew word for the sojourner or resident alien — the person who lives among YHWH's covenant people but is not ethnically Israelite. The local Hebrew artifact indexes this word at about 92 OT occurrences. The ger is the subject of more Torah legislation than any other vulnerable category, and one recurring motivating reason for that legislation is the same: 'you were gerim in Egypt.' Israel's social ethics toward the sojourner is grounded in covenant memory — the experience of vulnerability as aliens is to be transformed into solidarity with the vulnerable alien.
Leviticus 19:34 gives ger its most comprehensive command: 'The ger who sojourns with you shall be to you as the native among you, and you shall love him as yourself, for you were gerim in the land of Egypt: I am YHWH your God.' The two-clause structure is definitive: the command to love the ger as yourself (the neighbor-love of Lev 19:18 extended beyond ethnic Israel to the resident alien) is grounded in the Exodus-memory and sealed with the divine identity statement ('I am YHWH'). The ger-love is not optional; it is covenant obligation grounded in Exodus theology.
Deuteronomy 10:18-19 gives ger its YHWH-advocacy use: 'He executes justice for the fatherless and the widow, and loves the ger, giving him food and clothing. Love the ger, therefore, for you were gerim in Egypt.' YHWH himself is described as one who loves the ger — the covenant people's treatment of the sojourner is a participation in or a contradiction of YHWH's own character. The ger who is loved by YHWH and neglected by Israel exposes the covenant community's failure to imitate the God they worship.
Genesis 15:13 gives ger its covenantal-identity use: YHWH tells Abram that his offspring will be gerim in a land not theirs for four hundred years, oppressed and enslaved. The entire nation of Israel is born as a gerim-community — sojourners first in Canaan (Abraham, Isaac, Jacob), then enslaved aliens in Egypt. This identity-as-ger is the theological foundation for every Torah command about the sojourner: 'you know the soul of the ger, for you were gerim in Egypt' (Exod 23:9). Israel's ger-empathy is experiential, not merely commanded.
Psalm 146:9 gives ger its doxological use: 'YHWH watches over the sojourners (gerim); he upholds the fatherless and the widow, but the way of the wicked he brings to ruin.' YHWH's care for the ger is part of his praiseworthy character — the God who made heaven and earth (v. 6) is the God who watches over the ger (v. 9). The praise of YHWH is inseparable from the acknowledgment of his care for the vulnerable alien.
For the preacher, גֵּר (ger) gives the theological grounding for the church's care of the migrant, the refugee, and the socially marginalized: the covenant people who were once gerim are to love the ger with the same love YHWH showed them in Egypt and beyond. The NT church as 'strangers and exiles' (1 Pet 1:1, 2:11) inherits the ger-identity: the covenant community is itself a community of sojourners before the living God.
Sense foreigner, sojourner
Definition foreigner, sojourner
References 25:23, 25:35, 25:47
Why it matters Israel are foreigners with the Lord; poor Israelites are helped like resident foreigners; foreigners may become economically powerful.
Pastoral Entry
גְּאֻלָּה (geullah) is the noun derived from גָּאַל (gaal, H1350) — to act as kinsman-redeemer. Where gaal is the verb (the action of redeeming), geullah is either the act itself or the right to redeem: 'the right of redemption,' 'the redemption transaction,' or 'what was redeemed.'
The background is the Israelite property and family law of Leviticus 25: if a person fell into poverty and had to sell their land or themselves into debt-servitude, the nearest kinsman (the goel) had both the right and the obligation to buy the property back or redeem the person. This is not charity — it is a legal right and duty rooted in kinship. The geullah is the transaction by which the kinsman exercises that right.
The Book of Ruth is the fullest narrative exploration of geullah in the OT. Boaz, as a near-kinsman to Naomi's family, exercises the geullah right over Elimelech's land, and the narrative joins that transaction to preserving the family line through marriage to Ruth. The entire book turns on whether someone will step forward to exercise geullah, and Boaz does so at personal cost and as an act of hesed (covenant loyalty).
The broader גָּאַל word family contributes to the Old Testament portrayal of YHWH as Israel's goel. H1353 itself primarily names the legal right or act of redemption in Leviticus, Ruth, and Jeremiah. God acts as the divine kinsman who exercises the right of redemption for his people.
Sense redemption, right of redemption
Definition redemption, right of redemption
References 25:24, 25:26, 25:29, 25:31-32, 25:48, 25:51-52
Why it matters Redemption rights protect land and persons from permanent loss.
Pastoral Entry
גָּאַל is one of the most theologically rich verbs in the OT. In Israelite law it named the action of the גֹּאֵל — the kinsman-redeemer — the nearest male relative obligated to buy back what a family member had lost: a field sold under economic pressure, a person sold into slavery, or the life of someone murdered (blood avenger). The institution encoded in this verb is relational before it is legal: redemption in this legal-family register is the act of someone bound by kinship obligation, stepping in to restore what you could not restore yourself.
Ruth introduces us to the institution through Boaz, the גֹּאֵל who redeems Naomi's field and marries Ruth to preserve the family line. Leviticus 25 grounds the institution in theology: the land belongs to God, Israel are his tenants, and the kinsman-redeemer mechanism exists because God does not want his people permanently dispossessed of the inheritance he gave them.
The theological transfer of this verb to God himself is the great conceptual move of the prophets. Isaiah uses גָּאַל more than any other Old Testament writer, especially for God's redemption of Israel in Exodus and restoration imagery. 'Your Redeemer is the Holy One of Israel' (Isa 41:14). 'I am the Lord your God, the Holy One of Israel, your Savior... your Redeemer' (Isa 43:3, 14).
'As for our Redeemer — the Lord of hosts is his name' (Isa 47:4). The application of the kinsman-redeemer category to God draws on the legal institution's relational weight: God is not presented as an external rescuer who happens to intervene, but as the covenant Redeemer who binds himself to restore his people. The NT's fulfilment of גָּאַל is christological: Galatians 3:13 uses the Greek equivalent λυτρόω — 'Christ redeemed us from the curse of the law.'
But the deeper NT resonance of גָּאַל is in the Incarnation itself: the Son truly shares flesh and blood with those he redeems, so the redemption is not detached from real solidarity.
Sense to redeem, act as kinsman-redeemer
Definition to redeem, act as kinsman-redeemer
References 25:25-26, 25:30, 25:33, 25:48-49, 25:54
Why it matters A relative or the person himself may redeem property or servitude.
Sense near, close relative
Definition near, close relative
References 25:25, 25:49
Why it matters The nearest relative has redemption responsibility.
Sense to reach, obtain
Definition to reach, obtain
References 25:26, 25:47, 25:49
Why it matters If a person obtains sufficient means, he may redeem himself or property.
Pastoral Entry
עִיר (ir) is the common Hebrew noun for a city, town, or inhabited settlement. Genesis 4:17 says Cain built a city, Genesis 10:12 calls a settlement a great city, and Genesis 11:4 records the Babel builders' plan for a city and tower. Urban gathering can organize family, trade, defense, culture, worship, and power. The noun itself is morally neutral; Scripture evaluates what a city loves, builds, protects, oppresses, remembers, and worships.
Cities can become places of grave violence and judgment. Abraham asks whether righteous people in Sodom would be swept away with the city in Genesis 18:24, and Genesis 19 narrates urgent departure before destruction. Deuteronomy 13 addresses an Israelite city turned to idolatry, and Joshua 6 narrates Jericho's fall within the conquest. These are specific covenant and judgment texts. They do not authorize churches or modern states to label unwanted communities wicked and carry out religious violence.
Cities also become sites of refuge, worship, responsibility, and hope. Numbers 35 appoints cities of refuge to restrain blood vengeance and provide adjudication. Psalms 46, 48, and 87 celebrate the city of God, while Isaiah 60:14 names Zion the city of the Lord. Jeremiah 29:7 tells exiles to seek the welfare of the Babylonian city where they live, and Jonah is sent to a great foreign city whose violence God judges and whose repentance God receives. Ezekiel 48:35 ends with a restored city named “The Lord Is There.” These trajectories reach beyond one municipality without making any present city identical to Zion, Babylon, or Nineveh.
Sense city
Definition city
References 25:29-30, 25:32
Why it matters Houses in walled cities have distinct redemption rules.
Sense wall
Definition wall
References 25:29-31
Why it matters Walled-city houses are treated differently from village houses and fields.
Pastoral Entry
חָצֵר can denote a court or courtyard, an enclosure, or a settlement and its surrounding space. The local Hebrew index currently counts about 190 occurrences. In tabernacle and temple texts it refers to courts within the sanctuary complex; elsewhere it names palace courts, domestic enclosures, villages, or settlements. The word itself does not mean the divine presence, worship, or sacred space in every occurrence.
Exodus 27:9-19 specifies the tabernacle court as an enclosed area with hangings, pillars, sockets, and an entrance. The altar stood in this court, making it part of Israel’s ordered approach to the sanctuary. Psalm 84 longs for the courts of the Lord and values a place at the threshold of God’s house above dwelling in wickedness. The verse’s threshold language should not be turned into a precise temple office such as “the lowest position” unless the translation and context establish it.
Psalms 100 and 92 use the temple courts within calls to praise and images of the righteous flourishing. These poetic uses join location, worship, and longing, but they do not make the physical court a source from which divine life flows. The Lord, not the architecture, is the object of trust and praise.
For teaching, חָצֵר can help readers inhabit Israel’s sanctuary imagery and value gathered worship. Christian application should proceed through the New Testament’s explicit teaching about access to God through Christ and the church as God’s people. The church is not a lexical equivalent of the Hebrew courtyard, and a church building should not inherit the court’s holiness by analogy alone.
Sense village, settlement, courtyard
Definition village, settlement, courtyard
References 25:31
Why it matters Village houses without walls are treated as open-country land and return in Jubilee.
Sense Levite
Definition Levite
References 25:32-33
Why it matters Levitical towns and pasturelands have special redemption protections.
Sense pastureland, open land
Definition pastureland, open land
References 25:34
Why it matters Levitical pasturelands may not be sold because they are permanent possession.
Sense to become poor, grow poor
Definition to become poor, grow poor
References 25:25, 25:35, 25:39, 25:47
Why it matters The chapter repeatedly addresses Israelites who become poor and need protection or redemption.
Pastoral Entry
חָזַק (chazaq) is the Hebrew verb most commonly translated 'be strong' or 'strengthen.' It covers the spectrum from simple physical strength (a firm grip, a reinforced wall) to the moral courage required to face an overwhelming task. In the Piel stem, it means to strengthen or encourage someone; in the Hiphil, to make strong, seize, or hold fast.
The word appears at every great moment of transition and commission in the OT. When Moses charges Joshua before the entire assembly, when Joshua commissions the tribal leaders, when God speaks to Joshua after Moses dies — the repeated command is chazaq: 'Be strong and courageous.' The word creates a frame for covenantal obedience: the courage called for is not self-confidence but trust in the God who goes before.
But chazaq also describes Pharaoh's hardened heart (Exod 4:21 and throughout the plague narrative). This is the same word used for Israel's courageous call — and the contrast is theologically intentional. The strength that responds to God's commission and the stubbornness that resists God's demand are both described by chazaq. In these narrative and commissioning contexts, strength is morally directional: it can serve obedient courage or resistant hardening.
Sense to strengthen, support
Definition to strengthen, support
References 25:35
Why it matters Israel must support or strengthen a poor brother so he may live among them.
Sense to live
Definition to live
References 25:35-36
Why it matters The poor brother must be helped so he may continue living among the people.
Sense interest, usury
Definition interest, usury
References 25:36-37
Why it matters Interest charged to the poor brother is forbidden.
Sense increase, profit
Definition increase, profit
References 25:36-37
Why it matters Profit from the poor brother's need is forbidden.
Pastoral Entry
יָצָא is a very common Hebrew verb meaning to go out, come out, depart, emerge, or, in causative forms, bring out. The local Hebrew index currently counts about 1,076 occurrences. Most uses concern ordinary movement, while some become theologically prominent because of their narrative subject and setting. The verb itself is not a technical term for redemption.
Exodus 20:2 uses the Hiphil when the Lord identifies himself as the God who brought Israel out of Egypt and slavery. The covenant commands follow this declaration of deliverance, so the passage grounds Israel’s obligation in the Lord’s prior saving act. That theological pattern comes from the Exodus narrative, not from a special redemptive meaning embedded in every H3318 occurrence.
Isaiah 52:12 portrays Zion’s departure from Babylon with exodus-like language and says the people will not go out in haste or flight because the Lord will lead and guard them. This is a deliberate new-exodus pattern, but calling it simply “greater than the first” goes beyond the verse. Isaiah 55:11 says the Lord’s word goes out from his mouth and accomplishes his purpose; that promise concerns God’s own word, not an automatic guarantee about every sermon or human interpretation.
Genesis 4:16 says Cain went out from the Lord’s presence into exile. His departure belongs to his judgment and wandering, but not every later departure echoes Cain. Zechariah 14:8 says living waters will go out from Jerusalem in a future vision; the text does not identify that movement as a reversal of Cain’s H3318.
For teaching, יָצָא can help trace ordinary departures, exile, the Exodus, prophetic restoration, effective divine speech, and waters flowing from Jerusalem. Each movement requires its own subject, destination, cause, and canonical setting.
Sense to bring out, go out
Definition to bring out, go out
References 25:38, 25:41, 25:54-55
Why it matters The Lord brought Israel out of Egypt, and Israelites go out from servitude in Jubilee.
Sense Egypt
Definition Egypt
References 25:38, 25:42, 25:55
Why it matters Egypt is the place of bondage from which the Lord redeemed Israel, grounding servant-release laws.
Sense ruthlessness, harshness
Definition ruthlessness, harshness
References 25:43, 25:46, 25:53
Why it matters Ruthless rule over fellow Israelites is forbidden.
Pastoral Entry
נָחַל (nachal) is a verb for inheriting, receiving or possessing an allotted inheritance, and in causative forms giving or causing another to inherit. Numbers 26:55 uses it for tribal allotment by lot, Deuteronomy 1:38 says Joshua will cause Israel to inherit the land, and Deuteronomy 19:14 protects boundaries within the inheritance Israel receives.
Inheritance in these passages is gift and responsibility together. Israel receives land the Lord promised, yet allocation, boundaries, leadership, obedience, and neighbor rights remain concrete. The verb does not mean that every possession is a divine entitlement or that recipients may acquire or defend property through injustice. Numbers 18:20 also uses the verb negatively when Aaron is told he will not inherit land among Israel because the Lord is his portion and inheritance.
Wisdom extends the verb beyond land. Proverbs 3:35 says the wise inherit honor, and Proverbs 8:21 portrays Wisdom endowing those who love her with substance and filling their treasuries. Psalm 82:8 calls God to judge the earth because he inherits or possesses all nations. These uses broaden the semantic range without making Psalm 37:11 or Isaiah 54:3 direct H5157 evidence; those passages use H3423.
Sense to inherit, possess as inheritance
Definition to inherit, possess as inheritance
References 25:46
Why it matters Foreign slaves may be inherited, while Israelite servitude is limited by Jubilee and redemption.
Pastoral Entry
אָח (ach) is the Hebrew word for brother — and in its most theologically charged uses, it names the covenant-community relationship that YHWH requires his people to maintain with one another. From the tragedy of Cain and Abel (Gen 4) to the Deuteronomic law of the brother-poor (Deut 15:7-11) to the psalmist's vision of achim dwelling together in unity (Ps 133:1), ach carries the full weight of the covenant community's obligations to its own members. The local Hebrew artifact indexes this word at about 630 OT occurrences.
Psalm 133:1 gives ach its most concentrated vision: 'Behold, how good and pleasant it is when brothers (achim) dwell together in unity (gam yachad)!' The psalm is brief — three verses — but its vision is profound: the achim dwelling together in unity (yachad, togetherness, oneness) is like the oil of anointing (v. 2) and like the dew of Hermon (v. 3). The two images are not random: the oil of anointing is Aaron's consecration, the highest sacerdotal act; the dew of Hermon is the water that makes the land fruitful. When the achim dwell together in unity, the priestly blessing and the fruitfulness of the land flow together. This is why YHWH commands his berakah to rest there: 'for there YHWH has commanded the berakah, life forevermore' (v. 3).
Deuteronomy 15:7-11 gives ach its covenant-obligation form: 'If among you, one of your brothers (achikha) should become poor... you shall not harden your heart or shut your hand against your poor brother (achikha), but you shall open wide your hand to him and lend him sufficient for his need, whatever it may be.' The ach-relationship generates binding obligation: you may not close your hand to your brother who is poor. The covenant community's identity as achim means that the poor brother's need is your obligation, not your charity option.
Genesis 4:9 gives ach its foundational question: YHWH asks Cain, 'Where is Abel your brother (achicha)?' Cain's answer — 'Am I my brother's keeper?' — is the first human evasion of ach-obligation. The answer YHWH implies is yes: you are your brother's keeper. The blood of your brother cries out from the ground (v. 10). The ach-obligation is not dissolved by Cain's disavowal; it is violated and its violation produces the first murder.
Leviticus 25:25 gives ach its redemption-obligation: 'If your brother (achikha) becomes poor and sells part of his property, then his nearest redeemer (goel) shall come and redeem what his brother has sold.' The ach-redeemer (goel, H1353) is the one who restores the poor brother's lost property, buys back his freedom, and preserves the family's inheritance in the land. The Book of Ruth is the enacted parable of the goel-obligation: Boaz as the kinsman-redeemer who restores Naomi and Ruth by fulfilling the ach-obligation to its full extent.
Psalm 22:22 gives ach its congregational use: 'I will tell of your name to my brothers (achay); in the midst of the congregation I will praise you.' The speaker's deliverance from suffering becomes the occasion for proclaiming YHWH's name to the achim — the covenant community gathered for praise. This verse is quoted in Hebrews 2:12 as a word of Christ: 'I will tell of your name to my brothers (adelphois).'
For the preacher, אָח (ach) gives the congregation its basic social unit: not the isolated individual but the brother-network of mutual obligation, shared praise, and communal flourishing.
Sense brother
Definition brother
References 25:25, 25:35-36, 25:39, 25:46-48
Why it matters Fellow Israelites are treated as brothers, shaping poverty and servitude laws.
Lexicon data: MorphGNT Strong's Dictionary XML (CC0) · Open Scriptures Hebrew Bible (CC BY 4.0) · Open Scriptures Hebrew Lexicon (CC BY 4.0) · STEPBible Data (CC BY 4.0) · Full details
| v.10 | H1961הָיָהQal · Imperfect · Indicative/jussiveH7725שׁוּבQal · Imperfect · Indicative/jussive |
| v.11 | H1961הָיָהQal · Imperfect · Indicative/jussiveH2232זָרַעQal · Imperfect · Indicative/jussiveH7114קָצַרQal · Imperfect · Indicative/jussiveH1219בָּצַרQal · Imperfect · Indicative/jussive |
| v.12 | H1961הָיָהQal · Imperfect · Indicative/jussiveH398אָכַלQal · Imperfect · Indicative/jussive |
| v.13 | H7725שׁוּבQal · Imperfect · Indicative/jussive |
| v.14 | H4376מָכַרQal · Imperfect · Indicative/jussiveH7069קָנָהQal · Infinitive absoluteH3238יָנָהHiphil · Imperfect · Jussive |
| v.15 | H7069קָנָהQal · Imperfect · Indicative/jussiveH4376מָכַרQal · Imperfect · Indicative/jussive |
| v.16 | H7235רָבָהHiphil · Imperfect · Indicative/jussiveH4591מָעַטQal · Infinitive constructH4591מָעַטHiphil · Imperfect · Indicative/jussiveH4376מָכַרQal · Participle |
| v.17 | H3238יָנָהHiphil · Imperfect · Indicative/jussive |
| v.18 | H8104שָׁמַרQal · Imperfect · Indicative/jussive |
| v.2 | H1696דָבַרPiel · Imperative · ImperativeH935בּוֹאQal · Imperfect · Indicative/jussiveH5414נָתַןQal · Participle |
| v.20 | H559אָמַרQal · Imperfect · Indicative/jussiveH398אָכַלQal · Imperfect · Indicative/cohortativeH2232זָרַעQal · Imperfect · Indicative/cohortativeH622אָסַףQal · Imperfect · Indicative/cohortative |
| v.22 | H935בּוֹאQal · Infinitive constructH398אָכַלQal · Imperfect · Indicative/jussive |
| v.23 | H4376מָכַרNiphal · Imperfect · Indicative/jussive |
| v.24 | H5414נָתַןQal · Imperfect · Indicative/jussive |
| v.25 | H4134מוּךְQal · Imperfect · Indicative/jussive |
| v.26 | H1961הָיָהQal · Imperfect · Indicative/jussiveH1350גָּאַלQal · Participle |
| v.27 | H4376מָכַרQal · Perfect · Indicative |
| v.28 | H4672מָצָאQal · Perfect · IndicativeH7725שׁוּבHiphil · Infinitive construct |
| v.29 | H4376מָכַרQal · Imperfect · Indicative/jussiveH8537תֹּםQal · Infinitive constructH1961הָיָהQal · Imperfect · Indicative/jussive |
| v.3 | H2232זָרַעQal · Imperfect · Indicative/jussiveH2168זָמַרQal · Imperfect · Indicative/jussive |
| v.30 | H1350גָּאַלNiphal · Imperfect · Indicative/jussiveH4390מָלֵאQal · Infinitive constructH3318יָצָאQal · Imperfect · Indicative/jussive |
| v.31 | H2803חָשַׁבNiphal · Imperfect · Indicative/jussiveH1961הָיָהQal · Imperfect · Indicative/jussiveH3318יָצָאQal · Imperfect · Indicative/jussive |
| v.32 | H1961הָיָהQal · Imperfect · Indicative/jussive |
| v.33 | H1350גָּאַלQal · Imperfect · Indicative/jussive |
| v.34 | H4376מָכַרNiphal · Imperfect · Indicative/jussive |
| v.35 | H4134מוּךְQal · Imperfect · Indicative/jussive |
| v.36 | H3947לָקַחQal · Imperfect · Jussive |
| v.37 | H5414נָתַןQal · Imperfect · Indicative/jussiveH5414נָתַןQal · Imperfect · Indicative/jussive |
| v.38 | H3318יָצָאHiphil · Perfect · Indicative |
| v.39 | H4134מוּךְQal · Imperfect · Indicative/jussiveH5647עָבַדQal · Imperfect · Indicative/jussive |
| v.4 | H1961הָיָהQal · Imperfect · Indicative/jussiveH2232זָרַעQal · Imperfect · Indicative/jussiveH2168זָמַרQal · Imperfect · Indicative/jussive |
| v.40 | H1961הָיָהQal · Imperfect · Indicative/jussiveH5647עָבַדQal · Imperfect · Indicative/jussive |
| v.41 | H7725שׁוּבQal · Imperfect · Indicative/jussive |
| v.42 | H3318יָצָאHiphil · Perfect · IndicativeH4376מָכַרNiphal · Imperfect · Indicative/jussive |
| v.43 | H7287רָדָהQal · Imperfect · Indicative/jussive |
| v.44 | H1961הָיָהQal · Imperfect · Indicative/jussiveH7069קָנָהQal · Imperfect · Indicative/jussive |
| v.45 | H7069קָנָהQal · Imperfect · Indicative/jussiveH3205יָלַדHiphil · Perfect · Indicative |
| v.46 | H5647עָבַדQal · Imperfect · Indicative/jussiveH7287רָדָהQal · Imperfect · Indicative/jussive |
| v.47 | H5381נָשַׂגHiphil · Imperfect · Indicative/jussive |
| v.48 | H4376מָכַרNiphal · Perfect · IndicativeH1961הָיָהQal · Imperfect · Indicative/jussive |
| v.49 | H5381נָשַׂגHiphil · Perfect · Indicative |
| v.5 | H7114קָצַרQal · Imperfect · Indicative/jussiveH1219בָּצַרQal · Imperfect · Indicative/jussiveH1961הָיָהQal · Imperfect · Indicative/jussive |
| v.50 | H1961הָיָהQal · Imperfect · Indicative/jussive |
| v.51 | H7725שׁוּבHiphil · Imperfect · Indicative/jussive |
| v.52 | H7604שָׁאַרNiphal · Perfect · IndicativeH7725שׁוּבHiphil · Imperfect · Indicative/jussive |
| v.53 | H1961הָיָהQal · Imperfect · Indicative/jussive |
| v.54 | H1350גָּאַלNiphal · Imperfect · Indicative/jussive |
| v.55 | H3318יָצָאHiphil · Perfect · Indicative |
| v.7 | H1961הָיָהQal · Imperfect · Indicative/jussive |
| v.9 | H5674עָבַרHiphil · Imperfect · Indicative/jussive |
Aspect in Hebrew is grammatical form, not tense. Perfect = completed action; Imperfect = incomplete/ongoing. Stem modifies action type (Qal=simple, Niphal=passive, Piel=intensive).
Morphology: OSHB WLC (Open Scriptures, CC BY 4.0) · STEPBible TEHMC (Tyndale House, CC BY 4.0)
Theological Argument
Leviticus 25 teaches that holiness reaches into land economics and social structures. The land must rest because it belongs to the Lord. Family inheritance must be restored because Israel's land tenure is covenant stewardship, not absolute ownership. The poor must be supported because the Lord redeemed Israel from Egypt. Interest exploitation is forbidden because poverty must not become opportunity for gain.
Israelites must not be enslaved permanently because they are already the Lord's servants. Jubilee proclaims that Israel's economic life must periodically reset around divine ownership, redemption, mercy, and release.
From Sabbath rest for the land to Jubilee release for people and property, from economic fairness to trust in divine provision, from land redemption to poverty mercy, and from servitude laws to the final declaration that Israel belongs to the LORD.
- 1.The LORD speaks at Mount Sinai, tying these land laws to covenant revelation.
- 2.The land Israel enters is the LORD's gift and must keep Sabbath to Him.
- 3.Six years of work are followed by a seventh year of land rest.
- 4.The Sabbath year disrupts productivity idolatry and teaches reliance on what the LORD provides.
- 5.After seven Sabbath-year cycles, the fiftieth year is consecrated as Jubilee.
- 6.The trumpet of Jubilee is sounded on the Day of Atonement, linking release to atonement and covenant restoration.
- 7.Jubilee proclaims liberty throughout the land and returns people to family property.
- 8.Land purchases are really purchases of harvest years until Jubilee, not permanent alienation of inheritance.
- 9.Economic dealings must fear God and avoid taking advantage of one another.
- 10.Israel's anxiety about food during Sabbath years is answered by the LORD's promise of sixth-year abundance.
- 11.The land must not be sold permanently because the land belongs to the LORD.
- 12.Israel are foreigners and temporary residents with the LORD, even in their own inheritance.
- 13.Redemption rights protect family inheritance when poverty forces sale.
- 14.City houses, village houses, and Levitical property receive distinct rules because not all property functions the same way in Israel's covenant economy.
- 15.The poor must be strengthened so they can live among the people.
- 16.Interest and profit from a poor brother are forbidden because poverty must not be exploited.
- 17.Israelites who sell themselves must not be treated as slaves because the LORD brought them out of Egypt.
- 18.Jubilee releases Israelite servants and restores them to family and inheritance.
- 19.Foreign slaves are treated differently in the Old Covenant social order, but ruthless rule over fellow Israelites is forbidden.
- 20.Israelites sold to foreigners retain redemption rights through kinship and Jubilee.
- 21.The chapter closes with the decisive identity claim: the Israelites are the LORD's servants whom He brought out of Egypt.
Theological Focus
- Sabbath year
- Land rest
- Jubilee
- Trumpet proclamation
- Day of Atonement
- Liberty
- Return to family property
- Economic justice
- Fear of God
- Divine provision
- The Lord's ownership of land
- Redemption of property
- Kinsman Redeemer
- Poverty mercy
- No interest exploitation
- Israelite servitude
- Release
- Foreigners and temporary residents
- Exodus identity
- The Lord's servants
- The Land Belongs to the Lord
- Sabbath Extends Into Economics
- Jubilee Proclaims Liberty
- Atonement and Release Belong Together
- Economic Dealings Must Fear God
- The Poor Must Be Strengthened
- Redemption Protects Inheritance
- Israelites Belong to the Lord
- Obedience Requires Trust in Provision
- Holiness Includes Social Structures
- Sabbath
- The Lord's Ownership of the Land
- Redemption
- Divine Provision
- Economic Justice
- Mercy for the Poor
- Exodus Redemption
- The Lord's Servants
- Inheritance
- Christ the Redeemer
- Christ the Jubilee Fulfillment
- New Creation Inheritance
Theological Themes
Israel's land is not absolute private possession. It is the Lord's land, entrusted to Israel under covenant stewardship.
The Sabbath principle governs not only weekly time but agriculture, debt, labor, and national life.
The fiftieth year announces release, return, and restoration so poverty and loss do not become permanent destiny within Israel.
The Jubilee trumpet is sounded on the Day of Atonement, linking restored life in the land with atoning grace before God.
Buying, selling, lending, and hiring must be governed by reverence for the Lord and refusal to exploit.
Israel must support poor brothers so they may continue living among the covenant people.
Family members may redeem land or persons so that poverty does not permanently sever inheritance and belonging.
Because the Lord brought Israel out of Egypt, they are His servants and must not be treated as permanent slaves.
The Sabbath year forces Israel to trust the Lord's promised abundance rather than constant production.
The chapter shows that holiness is not merely personal piety but covenant-shaped land, labor, finance, and release.
Covenant Significance
Leviticus 25 gives Israel a covenant economy shaped by Sabbath and exodus. It prevents permanent alienation from land, unrestrained accumulation, exploitative lending, and permanent enslavement of fellow Israelites. The chapter protects clan inheritance and teaches that Israel's social life must mirror the Lord's redemption. The people must live as tenants, stewards, brothers, and servants of the Lord.
- The land must observe Sabbath rest every seventh year.
- Jubilee follows seven cycles of seven years.
- The Jubilee trumpet is sounded on the Day of Atonement.
- Liberty is proclaimed throughout the land.
- People return to family property and clan.
- Land sale prices are based on harvest years remaining until Jubilee.
- Israel must not take advantage of one another.
- The Lord promises provision for Sabbath-year obedience.
- The land belongs to the Lord.
- Redemption rights protect family property.
- Levitical towns and pasturelands receive special protection.
- Poor Israelites must be supported without interest.
- Israelite servants must be treated as hired workers, not slaves.
- Israelites are released in Jubilee.
- Israelites sold to foreigners retain redemption rights.
- The exodus is the theological basis for Israel's social economy.
- Exodus 23 commands the seventh-year rest for the land and provision for the poor and wild animals.
- Deuteronomy 15 commands debt release and generosity toward poor Israelites.
- Ruth develops the theme of kinsman redemption in family land and lineage restoration.
- Jeremiah 32 portrays land purchase and redemption hope during impending exile.
- 2 Chronicles 36 interprets exile partly in relation to the land enjoying its Sabbaths.
- Nehemiah 5 rebukes exploitation, interest, debt, and enslavement among returned Jews.
- Isaiah 61 announces good news, liberty, and the year of the Lord's favor.
- Ezekiel 46 includes concern for princely land justice and inheritance.
Canonical Connections
Exodus 23 gives an earlier command for the land to rest in the seventh year for the poor and animals.
The land Sabbath extends the creation Sabbath principle into Israel's agricultural life.
Deuteronomy grounds Sabbath in exodus redemption, which also grounds Leviticus 25's servant laws.
Deuteronomy 15 develops release and generosity commands that resonate with Leviticus 25.
Boaz's redemption of family land and Ruth's family line reflects the redemption logic of Leviticus 25.
Jeremiah's land purchase during impending exile depends on the hope that houses, fields, and vineyards will again be bought.
Chronicles interprets the exile as the land enjoying its Sabbath rests.
Nehemiah rebukes interest, debt oppression, and enslavement among returned Jews.
Isaiah announces good news to the poor, liberty to captives, and the year of the Lord's favor.
Jesus reads Isaiah 61 and declares its fulfillment in His ministry.
The New Testament presents Christ's blood as the redemption price for His people.
Hebrews develops the theme of Sabbath rest for God's people.
Cross References
Canon-Wide Connections
Cross-reference data: OpenBible.info (CC BY 4.0)
Leviticus 25 clarifies the gospel by showing that humanity needs rest, release, redemption, restored inheritance, and freedom from bondage. The Sabbath year exposes our restless unbelief. Jubilee exposes the tragedy of lost inheritance and permanent captivity. Christ fulfills the redemption trajectory by entering our kinship, paying the redemption price with His blood, releasing us from sin's bondage, and restoring us to the inheritance of God's kingdom. The gospel is the true Jubilee proclamation.
- The land Sabbath points to rest in God's provision.
- Jubilee proclaims liberty and restoration.
- The Day of Atonement trumpet links release with atonement.
- The kinsman-redeemer pattern prepares for Christ's incarnate redemption.
- Christ redeems His people not with silver but with His blood.
- Christ releases captives from sin, guilt, Satan, death, and exile from God.
- Christ restores the inheritance of God's people.
- Christ's kingdom forms a people who practice generosity, mercy, and release.
- The church's care for the poor is not a substitute for the gospel but a fruit of Jubilee redemption in Christ.
- Final Jubilee awaits the new creation, where inheritance, rest, and freedom are fully realized.
- Do not preach Jubilee as mere economics detached from atonement and redemption.
- Do not reduce Christ's mission to social reform, even though His gospel produces mercy and justice.
- Do not ignore the poor and oppressed while claiming to preach Jubilee fulfillment.
- Do not treat Sabbath rest as legalistic performance.
- Do not use this chapter to justify exploitation or slavery.
- Do not flatten Israel's land laws into direct modern state policy without covenantal and canonical care.
- Do not preach release without repentance, redemption, and restoration to God.
- Do not forget that the deepest bondage is sin and the deepest inheritance is God Himself.
Primary Emphasis
Leviticus 25 prepares for Christ through Sabbath rest, Jubilee liberty, redemption, release from debt bondage, restoration of inheritance, and good news to the poor. Jesus announces His ministry in Jubilee-like language from Isaiah 61, proclaiming good news, freedom, sight, and the year of the Lord's favor. Christ is the true Redeemer who releases His people from bondage, restores inheritance, and brings the deeper Sabbath rest of salvation.
Chapter Contribution
Leviticus 25 teaches that holiness reaches into land economics and social structures. The land must rest because it belongs to the Lord. Family inheritance must be restored because Israel's land tenure is covenant stewardship, not absolute ownership. The poor must be supported because the Lord redeemed Israel from Egypt. Interest exploitation is forbidden because poverty must not become opportunity for gain.
Israelites must not be enslaved permanently because they are already the Lord's servants. Jubilee proclaims that Israel's economic life must periodically reset around divine ownership, redemption, mercy, and release.
Study holiness as divine character, covenant identity, and sanctified life across Scripture.
Study kingdom reign, divine rule, and gospel kingdom proclamation across Scripture.
Trace remnant preservation, covenant continuity, and mercy under judgment across Scripture.
God commands tangible care for vulnerable members within His people.
Israel’s redemption by God establishes unique social obligations among its members.
God structures Israel’s property system to preserve tribal inheritance.
Blessing and security are tied to obedience to God’s commands.
Israel must rely on God’s provision rather than constant labor.
God regulates social and economic structures within His covenant community.
The land ultimately belongs to the Lord, not to individuals.
God supplies the needs of His people according to His promise.
God protects the livelihood of the Levites who serve Him.
God’s people must rely on His provision rather than their own control.
Authority is exercised under reverence for God, not domination.
Release from bondage is built into the covenant structure.
Authority must not become ruthless domination, especially among God’s people.
Exploitation of the needy is forbidden within the covenant community.
Property rights are governed by God’s law rather than human autonomy.
God provides for all within the community, including the vulnerable.
God’s past deliverance establishes the pattern for present conduct.
The Jubilee system ensures that covenant inheritance is not permanently lost.
God extends the principle of rest to the land itself.
God governs the productivity of the land and the outcome of labor.
People manage what God owns rather than possessing it absolutely.
The Sabbath principle governs the land every seventh year and shapes Israel's economic life.
The land must not be sold permanently because it belongs to the Lord.
The fiftieth year proclaims liberty, return, and restoration throughout the land.
Property and persons may be redeemed from loss or bondage through kinship provision.
The Lord promises abundant provision for those who obey Sabbath-year commands.
Buying, selling, lending, and labor are regulated by fairness, fear of God, and refusal of exploitation.
Poor Israelites must be supported and not exploited through interest or ruthless service.
The Lord's redemption from Egypt grounds Israel's treatment of servants, debtors, and the poor.
Israelites are the Lord's servants and therefore must not be treated as permanent slaves.
Jubilee protects return to family property and clan inheritance.
The kinsman-redemption pattern points toward Christ, who redeems His people by His blood.
Christ proclaims and accomplishes the deeper liberty, restoration, and inheritance anticipated by Jubilee.
The restoration of land inheritance points toward the final inheritance of God's people in the renewed creation.
Theological exposition and fulfillment
- Leviticus 25 clarifies the gospel by showing that humanity needs rest, release, redemption, restored inheritance, and freedom from bondage. The Sabbath year exposes our restless unbelief. Jubilee exposes the tragedy of lost inheritance and permanent captivity. Christ fulfills the redemption trajectory by entering our kinship, paying the redemption price with His blood, releasing us from sin's bondage, and restoring us to the inheritance of God's kingdom. The gospel is the true Jubilee proclamation.
The Lord owns the land and the people; therefore Israel must practice Sabbath rest, Jubilee release, economic justice, poverty mercy, property redemption, and servant protection as redeemed stewards.
God's people must reject exploitative ownership, restless productivity, poverty profiteering, permanent bondage, and hopelessness, while embracing Christ as the Redeemer who brings true liberty and inheritance.
Trust, mercy, generosity, justice, restraint, stewardship, humility, hope, and reverence for the Lord's ownership.
- Rest in the Lord's provision rather than idolizing productivity.
- Treat possessions as stewardship.
- Refuse to exploit another person's poverty.
- Strengthen the poor so they can live among God's people.
- Practice fair dealing in buying, selling, lending, and hiring.
- Build release and restoration into community life.
- Remember that redeemed people belong to the Lord.
- Proclaim Christ as the true Redeemer and Jubilee.
- The chapter warns against exploiting land, poor brothers, debtors, hired workers, and fellow Israelites. Israel must fear God in economic dealings because the land and people belong to the Lord.
- Leviticus 25 is merely an ancient agrarian policy with little theological meaning. - The chapter is deeply theological: the land belongs to the Lord, Israel are His servants, Sabbath rest requires trust, and Jubilee proclaims covenant liberty.
- Jubilee abolishes all property distinctions permanently. - Jubilee restores family inheritance and limits permanent alienation. It does not remove all land allotments or family inheritance structures.
- The Sabbath year is only ecological land management. - Land rest may benefit the land, but the primary theological point is Sabbath to the Lord, trust in His provision, and covenant obedience.
- The chapter condemns all lending or all profit in every context. - The immediate concern is exploiting poor Israelites through interest and profit in their vulnerability. Broader wisdom is needed for application.
- Israelite servitude is identical to modern race-based chattel slavery. - The chapter's Israelite servitude laws regulate debt-related service, require humane treatment, prohibit ruthless rule, and mandate release. Still, the foreign-slave provisions must be handled soberly within Old Covenant redemptive-historical context.
- The foreign-slave permission represents the Bible's final moral vision. - Leviticus 25 belongs to Israel's ancient covenant administration. The canonical trajectory moves toward redemption in Christ, equal dignity in creation, and the brotherhood of redeemed people.
- Christ's Jubilee fulfillment is only political or economic liberation. - Christ's fulfillment includes concern for the poor and oppressed but reaches deeper to liberation from sin, guilt, death, Satan, and alienation from God.
- Jubilee means Christians can ignore responsible stewardship, repayment, and labor. - The chapter teaches stewardship, fair valuation, restitution, work, mercy, and release under God's ownership, not irresponsibility.
- What do I treat as mine in a way that forgets the Lord's ownership?
- Where does my refusal to rest reveal unbelief in God's provision?
- Do I view the poor as burdens, opportunities, or brothers and neighbors to strengthen?
- Where might I profit from another person's vulnerability?
- Do my financial dealings reflect fear of God?
- How does the Jubilee challenge permanent hopelessness?
- What would it look like to practice gospel-shaped release and restoration in church life?
- How does Christ as Redeemer surpass the kinsman-redeemer pattern?
- What inheritance has Christ restored to His people?
- How should Christ's Jubilee mission shape preaching, mercy ministry, counseling, and discipleship?
- Preach that ownership is stewardship under God.
- Teach rest as spiritual warfare against productivity idolatry.
- Protect the poor from exploitative help.
- Recover redemption as a social and theological category.
- Use Jubilee to preach hope without sentimentalism.
- Address debt and poverty with wisdom and mercy.
- Handle slavery texts honestly and canonically.
- Proclaim Christ as the true Jubilee.
The Sabbath principle expands from weekly time into agricultural and economic life.
The land's Sabbath leads to Jubilee liberty for people and property.
Jubilee is proclaimed on the Day of Atonement, linking reconciliation with release.
Israel's land tenure is redefined by the Lord's claim: the land is His.
Poverty may force sale of land or service, but redemption and Jubilee prevent permanent loss.
Because the Lord brought Israel out of Egypt, they must not be treated as permanent slaves.
The relative who redeems anticipates Christ, who becomes our brother to redeem us.
The proclamation of liberty prepares for Christ's announcement of good news and release.
C.F. Keil & F. Delitzsch, Commentary on the Old Testament (1861–91) — public domain
The Biblical World
Chapter At A Glance
The Lord speaks to Moses at Mount Sinai and commands that the land itself must observe a Sabbath to the Lord every seventh year. After seven Sabbath years, the fiftieth year is consecrated as Jubilee, announced with the trumpet on the Day of Atonement. Property is returned, liberty is proclaimed, and economic transactions are governed by the number of harvest years remaining until Jubilee.
The chapter then provides laws for trusting the Lord's provision during the Sabbath year, redeeming land, selling houses, protecting Levitical towns, helping poor Israelites, prohibiting interest exploitation, regulating Israelite servitude, and redeeming Israelites sold to resident foreigners. The chapter closes by grounding everything in the exodus: Israelites belong to the Lord as His servants.
Leviticus 25 gives Israel a covenant economy shaped by Sabbath and exodus. It prevents permanent alienation from land, unrestrained accumulation, exploitative lending, and permanent enslavement of fellow Israelites. The chapter protects clan inheritance and teaches that Israel's social life must mirror the Lord's redemption. The people must live as tenants, stewards, brothers, and servants of the Lord.
Leviticus 25 clarifies the gospel by showing that humanity needs rest, release, redemption, restored inheritance, and freedom from bondage. The Sabbath year exposes our restless unbelief. Jubilee exposes the tragedy of lost inheritance and permanent captivity. Christ fulfills the redemption trajectory by entering our kinship, paying the redemption price with His blood, releasing us from sin's bondage, and restoring us to the inheritance of God's kingdom. The gospel is the true Jubilee proclamation.
Trust, mercy, generosity, justice, restraint, stewardship, humility, hope, and reverence for the Lord's ownership.
Focus Points
- Sabbath year
- Land rest
- Jubilee
- Trumpet proclamation
- Day of Atonement
- Liberty
- Return to family property
- Economic justice
- Fear of God
- Divine provision
- The Lord's ownership of land
- Redemption of property
- Kinsman-redeemer
- Poverty mercy
- No interest exploitation
- Israelite servitude
- Release
- Foreigners and temporary residents
- Exodus identity
- The Lord's servants
- The Land Belongs to the Lord
- Sabbath Extends Into Economics
- Jubilee Proclaims Liberty
- Atonement and Release Belong Together
- Economic Dealings Must Fear God
- The Poor Must Be Strengthened
- Redemption Protects Inheritance
- Israelites Belong to the Lord
- Obedience Requires Trust in Provision
- Holiness Includes Social Structures
- Sabbath
- The Lord's Ownership of the Land
- Redemption
- Mercy for the Poor
- Exodus Redemption
- Inheritance
- Christ the Redeemer
- Christ the Jubilee Fulfillment
- New Creation Inheritance
Lev 23:5-14 The leading directions for the Passover and feast of Mazzoth are repeated from Exo 12:6, Exo 12:11, Exo 12:15-20. עבדה מלאכת, occupation of a work, signifies labour at some definite occupation, e. g. , the building of the tabernacle, Exo 35:24; Exo 36:1, Exo 36:3; hence occupation in connection with trade or one’s social calling, such as agriculture, handicraft, and so forth; whilst מלאכה is the performance of any kind of work, e.
g. , kindling fire for cooking food (Exo 35:2-3). On the Sabbath and the day of atonement every kind of civil work was prohibited, even to the kindling of fire for the purpose of cooking (Lev 23:3, Lev 23:30, Lev 23:31, cf. Exo 20:10; Exo 31:14; Exo 35:2-3; Deu 5:14 and Lev 16:29; Num 29:7); on the other feast-days with a holy convocation, only servile work (Lev 23:7, Lev 23:8, Lev 23:21, Lev 23:25, Lev 23:35, Lev 23:36, cf.
Exo 12:16, and the explanation on Lev 12:1-8 :15ff. , and Num 28:18, Num 28:25-26; Num 29:1, Num 29:12, Num 29:35). To this there is appended a fresh regulation in Lev 23:9-14, with the repetition of the introductory clause, “ And the Lord spake, ” etc. When the Israelites had come into the land to be given them by the Lord, and had reaped the harvest, they were to bring a sheaf as first-fruits of their harvest to the priest, that he might wave it before Jehovah on the day after the Sabbath, i.
e. , after the first day of Mazzoth . According to Josephus and Philo , it was a sheaf of barley; but this is not expressly commanded, because it would be taken for granted in Canaan, where the harvest began with the barley. In the warmer parts of Palestine the barley ripens about the middle of April, and is reaped in April or the beginning of May, whereas the wheat ripens two or three weeks later ( Seetzen; Robinson 's Pal.
ii. 263, 278). The priest was to wave the sheaf before Jehovah, i. e. , to present it symbolically to Jehovah by the ceremony of waving, without burning any of it upon the altar. The rabbinical rule, viz. , to dry a portion of the ears by the fire, and then, after rubbing them out, to burn them on the altar, was an ordinance of the later scribes, who knew not the law, and was based upon Lev 2:14.
For the law in Lev 2:14 refers to the offerings of first-fruits made by private persons, which are treated of in Num 18:12-13, and Deu 26:2. The sheaf of first-fruits, on the other hand, which was to be offered before Jehovah as a wave-offering in the name of the congregation, corresponded to the two wave-loaves which were leavened and then baked, and were to be presented to the Lord as first-fruits (Lev 23:17).
As no portion of these wave-loaves was burned upon the altar, because nothing leavened was to be placed upon it (Lev 2:11), but they were assigned entirely to the priests, we have only to assume that the same application was intended by the law in the case of the sheaf of first-fruits, since the text only prescribes the waving, and does not contain a word about roasting, rubbing, or burning the grains upon the altar. השּׁבּת מחרת (the morrow after the Sabbath) signifies the next day after the first day of the feast of Mazzoth, i.
e. , the 16th Abib ( Nisan ), not the day of the Sabbath which fell in the seven days’ feast of Mazzoth, as the Baethoseans supposed, still less the 22nd of Nisan, or the day after the conclusion of the seven days’ feast, which always closed with a Sabbath, as Hitzig imagines. The “Sabbath” does not mean the seventh day of the week, but the day of rest, although the weekly Sabbath was always the seventh or last day of the week; hence not only the seventh day of the week (Exo 31:15, etc.)
, but the day of atonement (the tenth of the seventh month), is called “ Sabbath ,” and “ Shabbath shabbathon ” (Lev 23:32; Lev 16:31). As a day of rest, on which no laborious work was to be performed (Lev 23:8), the first day of the feast of Mazzoth is called “ Sabbath ,” irrespectively of the day of the week upon which it fell; and “ the morrow after the Sabbath ” is equivalent to “the morrow after the Passover” mentioned in Jos 5:11, where “Passover” signifies the day at the beginning of which the paschal meal was held, i.
e. , the first day of unleavened bread, which commenced on the evening of the 14th, in other words, the 15th Abib. By offering the sheaf of first-fruits of the harvest, the Israelites were to consecrate their daily bread to the Lord their God, and practically to acknowledge that they owed the blessing of the harvest to the grace of God. They were not to eat any bread or roasted grains of the new corn till they had presented the offering of their God (Lev 23:14).
This offering was fixed for the second day of the feast of the Passover, that the connection between the harvest and the Passover might be kept in subordination to the leading idea of the Passover itself (see at Exo 12:15.) But as the sheaf was not burned upon the altar, but only presented symbolically to the Lord by waving, and then handed over to the priests, an altar-gift had to be connected with it, - namely, a yearling sheep as a burnt-offering, a meat-offering of two-tenths of an ephah of fine flour mixed with oil, and a drink-offering of a quarter of a hin of wine, - to give expression to the obligation and willingness of the congregation not only to enjoy their earthly food, but to strengthen all the members of their body for growth in holiness and diligence in good works.
The burnt-offering, for which a yearling lamb was prescribed, as in fact for all the regular festal sacrifices, was of course in addition to the burnt-offerings prescribed in Num 28:19-20, for every feast-day. The meat-offering, however, was not to consist of one-tenth of an ephah of fine flour, as on other occasions (Exo 29:40; Num 28:9, Num 28:13, etc.) , but of two-tenths, that the offering of corn at the harvest-feast might be a more plentiful one than usual.
Lev 23:5-14 The leading directions for the Passover and feast of Mazzoth are repeated from Exo 12:6, Exo 12:11, Exo 12:15-20. עבדה מלאכת, occupation of a work, signifies labour at some definite occupation, e. g. , the building of the tabernacle, Exo 35:24; Exo 36:1, Exo 36:3; hence occupation in connection with trade or one’s social calling, such as agriculture, handicraft, and so forth; whilst מלאכה is the performance of any kind of work, e.
g. , kindling fire for cooking food (Exo 35:2-3). On the Sabbath and the day of atonement every kind of civil work was prohibited, even to the kindling of fire for the purpose of cooking (Lev 23:3, Lev 23:30, Lev 23:31, cf. Exo 20:10; Exo 31:14; Exo 35:2-3; Deu 5:14 and Lev 16:29; Num 29:7); on the other feast-days with a holy convocation, only servile work (Lev 23:7, Lev 23:8, Lev 23:21, Lev 23:25, Lev 23:35, Lev 23:36, cf.
Exo 12:16, and the explanation on Lev 12:1-8 :15ff. , and Num 28:18, Num 28:25-26; Num 29:1, Num 29:12, Num 29:35). To this there is appended a fresh regulation in Lev 23:9-14, with the repetition of the introductory clause, “ And the Lord spake, ” etc. When the Israelites had come into the land to be given them by the Lord, and had reaped the harvest, they were to bring a sheaf as first-fruits of their harvest to the priest, that he might wave it before Jehovah on the day after the Sabbath, i.
e. , after the first day of Mazzoth . According to Josephus and Philo , it was a sheaf of barley; but this is not expressly commanded, because it would be taken for granted in Canaan, where the harvest began with the barley. In the warmer parts of Palestine the barley ripens about the middle of April, and is reaped in April or the beginning of May, whereas the wheat ripens two or three weeks later ( Seetzen; Robinson 's Pal.
ii. 263, 278). The priest was to wave the sheaf before Jehovah, i. e. , to present it symbolically to Jehovah by the ceremony of waving, without burning any of it upon the altar. The rabbinical rule, viz. , to dry a portion of the ears by the fire, and then, after rubbing them out, to burn them on the altar, was an ordinance of the later scribes, who knew not the law, and was based upon Lev 2:14.
For the law in Lev 2:14 refers to the offerings of first-fruits made by private persons, which are treated of in Num 18:12-13, and Deu 26:2. The sheaf of first-fruits, on the other hand, which was to be offered before Jehovah as a wave-offering in the name of the congregation, corresponded to the two wave-loaves which were leavened and then baked, and were to be presented to the Lord as first-fruits (Lev 23:17).
As no portion of these wave-loaves was burned upon the altar, because nothing leavened was to be placed upon it (Lev 2:11), but they were assigned entirely to the priests, we have only to assume that the same application was intended by the law in the case of the sheaf of first-fruits, since the text only prescribes the waving, and does not contain a word about roasting, rubbing, or burning the grains upon the altar. השּׁבּת מחרת (the morrow after the Sabbath) signifies the next day after the first day of the feast of Mazzoth, i.
e. , the 16th Abib ( Nisan ), not the day of the Sabbath which fell in the seven days’ feast of Mazzoth, as the Baethoseans supposed, still less the 22nd of Nisan, or the day after the conclusion of the seven days’ feast, which always closed with a Sabbath, as Hitzig imagines. The “Sabbath” does not mean the seventh day of the week, but the day of rest, although the weekly Sabbath was always the seventh or last day of the week; hence not only the seventh day of the week (Exo 31:15, etc.)
, but the day of atonement (the tenth of the seventh month), is called “ Sabbath ,” and “ Shabbath shabbathon ” (Lev 23:32; Lev 16:31). As a day of rest, on which no laborious work was to be performed (Lev 23:8), the first day of the feast of Mazzoth is called “ Sabbath ,” irrespectively of the day of the week upon which it fell; and “ the morrow after the Sabbath ” is equivalent to “the morrow after the Passover” mentioned in Jos 5:11, where “Passover” signifies the day at the beginning of which the paschal meal was held, i.
e. , the first day of unleavened bread, which commenced on the evening of the 14th, in other words, the 15th Abib. By offering the sheaf of first-fruits of the harvest, the Israelites were to consecrate their daily bread to the Lord their God, and practically to acknowledge that they owed the blessing of the harvest to the grace of God. They were not to eat any bread or roasted grains of the new corn till they had presented the offering of their God (Lev 23:14).
This offering was fixed for the second day of the feast of the Passover, that the connection between the harvest and the Passover might be kept in subordination to the leading idea of the Passover itself (see at Exo 12:15.) But as the sheaf was not burned upon the altar, but only presented symbolically to the Lord by waving, and then handed over to the priests, an altar-gift had to be connected with it, - namely, a yearling sheep as a burnt-offering, a meat-offering of two-tenths of an ephah of fine flour mixed with oil, and a drink-offering of a quarter of a hin of wine, - to give expression to the obligation and willingness of the congregation not only to enjoy their earthly food, but to strengthen all the members of their body for growth in holiness and diligence in good works.
The burnt-offering, for which a yearling lamb was prescribed, as in fact for all the regular festal sacrifices, was of course in addition to the burnt-offerings prescribed in Num 28:19-20, for every feast-day. The meat-offering, however, was not to consist of one-tenth of an ephah of fine flour, as on other occasions (Exo 29:40; Num 28:9, Num 28:13, etc.) , but of two-tenths, that the offering of corn at the harvest-feast might be a more plentiful one than usual.
Lev 23:5-14 The leading directions for the Passover and feast of Mazzoth are repeated from Exo 12:6, Exo 12:11, Exo 12:15-20. עבדה מלאכת, occupation of a work, signifies labour at some definite occupation, e. g. , the building of the tabernacle, Exo 35:24; Exo 36:1, Exo 36:3; hence occupation in connection with trade or one’s social calling, such as agriculture, handicraft, and so forth; whilst מלאכה is the performance of any kind of work, e.
g. , kindling fire for cooking food (Exo 35:2-3). On the Sabbath and the day of atonement every kind of civil work was prohibited, even to the kindling of fire for the purpose of cooking (Lev 23:3, Lev 23:30, Lev 23:31, cf. Exo 20:10; Exo 31:14; Exo 35:2-3; Deu 5:14 and Lev 16:29; Num 29:7); on the other feast-days with a holy convocation, only servile work (Lev 23:7, Lev 23:8, Lev 23:21, Lev 23:25, Lev 23:35, Lev 23:36, cf.
Exo 12:16, and the explanation on Lev 12:1-8 :15ff. , and Num 28:18, Num 28:25-26; Num 29:1, Num 29:12, Num 29:35). To this there is appended a fresh regulation in Lev 23:9-14, with the repetition of the introductory clause, “ And the Lord spake, ” etc. When the Israelites had come into the land to be given them by the Lord, and had reaped the harvest, they were to bring a sheaf as first-fruits of their harvest to the priest, that he might wave it before Jehovah on the day after the Sabbath, i.
e. , after the first day of Mazzoth . According to Josephus and Philo , it was a sheaf of barley; but this is not expressly commanded, because it would be taken for granted in Canaan, where the harvest began with the barley. In the warmer parts of Palestine the barley ripens about the middle of April, and is reaped in April or the beginning of May, whereas the wheat ripens two or three weeks later ( Seetzen; Robinson 's Pal.
ii. 263, 278). The priest was to wave the sheaf before Jehovah, i. e. , to present it symbolically to Jehovah by the ceremony of waving, without burning any of it upon the altar. The rabbinical rule, viz. , to dry a portion of the ears by the fire, and then, after rubbing them out, to burn them on the altar, was an ordinance of the later scribes, who knew not the law, and was based upon Lev 2:14.
For the law in Lev 2:14 refers to the offerings of first-fruits made by private persons, which are treated of in Num 18:12-13, and Deu 26:2. The sheaf of first-fruits, on the other hand, which was to be offered before Jehovah as a wave-offering in the name of the congregation, corresponded to the two wave-loaves which were leavened and then baked, and were to be presented to the Lord as first-fruits (Lev 23:17).
As no portion of these wave-loaves was burned upon the altar, because nothing leavened was to be placed upon it (Lev 2:11), but they were assigned entirely to the priests, we have only to assume that the same application was intended by the law in the case of the sheaf of first-fruits, since the text only prescribes the waving, and does not contain a word about roasting, rubbing, or burning the grains upon the altar. השּׁבּת מחרת (the morrow after the Sabbath) signifies the next day after the first day of the feast of Mazzoth, i.
e. , the 16th Abib ( Nisan ), not the day of the Sabbath which fell in the seven days’ feast of Mazzoth, as the Baethoseans supposed, still less the 22nd of Nisan, or the day after the conclusion of the seven days’ feast, which always closed with a Sabbath, as Hitzig imagines. The “Sabbath” does not mean the seventh day of the week, but the day of rest, although the weekly Sabbath was always the seventh or last day of the week; hence not only the seventh day of the week (Exo 31:15, etc.)
, but the day of atonement (the tenth of the seventh month), is called “ Sabbath ,” and “ Shabbath shabbathon ” (Lev 23:32; Lev 16:31). As a day of rest, on which no laborious work was to be performed (Lev 23:8), the first day of the feast of Mazzoth is called “ Sabbath ,” irrespectively of the day of the week upon which it fell; and “ the morrow after the Sabbath ” is equivalent to “the morrow after the Passover” mentioned in Jos 5:11, where “Passover” signifies the day at the beginning of which the paschal meal was held, i.
e. , the first day of unleavened bread, which commenced on the evening of the 14th, in other words, the 15th Abib. By offering the sheaf of first-fruits of the harvest, the Israelites were to consecrate their daily bread to the Lord their God, and practically to acknowledge that they owed the blessing of the harvest to the grace of God. They were not to eat any bread or roasted grains of the new corn till they had presented the offering of their God (Lev 23:14).
This offering was fixed for the second day of the feast of the Passover, that the connection between the harvest and the Passover might be kept in subordination to the leading idea of the Passover itself (see at Exo 12:15.) But as the sheaf was not burned upon the altar, but only presented symbolically to the Lord by waving, and then handed over to the priests, an altar-gift had to be connected with it, - namely, a yearling sheep as a burnt-offering, a meat-offering of two-tenths of an ephah of fine flour mixed with oil, and a drink-offering of a quarter of a hin of wine, - to give expression to the obligation and willingness of the congregation not only to enjoy their earthly food, but to strengthen all the members of their body for growth in holiness and diligence in good works.
The burnt-offering, for which a yearling lamb was prescribed, as in fact for all the regular festal sacrifices, was of course in addition to the burnt-offerings prescribed in Num 28:19-20, for every feast-day. The meat-offering, however, was not to consist of one-tenth of an ephah of fine flour, as on other occasions (Exo 29:40; Num 28:9, Num 28:13, etc.) , but of two-tenths, that the offering of corn at the harvest-feast might be a more plentiful one than usual.
Lev 23:5-14 The leading directions for the Passover and feast of Mazzoth are repeated from Exo 12:6, Exo 12:11, Exo 12:15-20. עבדה מלאכת, occupation of a work, signifies labour at some definite occupation, e. g. , the building of the tabernacle, Exo 35:24; Exo 36:1, Exo 36:3; hence occupation in connection with trade or one’s social calling, such as agriculture, handicraft, and so forth; whilst מלאכה is the performance of any kind of work, e.
g. , kindling fire for cooking food (Exo 35:2-3). On the Sabbath and the day of atonement every kind of civil work was prohibited, even to the kindling of fire for the purpose of cooking (Lev 23:3, Lev 23:30, Lev 23:31, cf. Exo 20:10; Exo 31:14; Exo 35:2-3; Deu 5:14 and Lev 16:29; Num 29:7); on the other feast-days with a holy convocation, only servile work (Lev 23:7, Lev 23:8, Lev 23:21, Lev 23:25, Lev 23:35, Lev 23:36, cf.
Exo 12:16, and the explanation on Lev 12:1-8 :15ff. , and Num 28:18, Num 28:25-26; Num 29:1, Num 29:12, Num 29:35). To this there is appended a fresh regulation in Lev 23:9-14, with the repetition of the introductory clause, “ And the Lord spake, ” etc. When the Israelites had come into the land to be given them by the Lord, and had reaped the harvest, they were to bring a sheaf as first-fruits of their harvest to the priest, that he might wave it before Jehovah on the day after the Sabbath, i.
e. , after the first day of Mazzoth . According to Josephus and Philo , it was a sheaf of barley; but this is not expressly commanded, because it would be taken for granted in Canaan, where the harvest began with the barley. In the warmer parts of Palestine the barley ripens about the middle of April, and is reaped in April or the beginning of May, whereas the wheat ripens two or three weeks later ( Seetzen; Robinson 's Pal.
ii. 263, 278). The priest was to wave the sheaf before Jehovah, i. e. , to present it symbolically to Jehovah by the ceremony of waving, without burning any of it upon the altar. The rabbinical rule, viz. , to dry a portion of the ears by the fire, and then, after rubbing them out, to burn them on the altar, was an ordinance of the later scribes, who knew not the law, and was based upon Lev 2:14.
For the law in Lev 2:14 refers to the offerings of first-fruits made by private persons, which are treated of in Num 18:12-13, and Deu 26:2. The sheaf of first-fruits, on the other hand, which was to be offered before Jehovah as a wave-offering in the name of the congregation, corresponded to the two wave-loaves which were leavened and then baked, and were to be presented to the Lord as first-fruits (Lev 23:17).
As no portion of these wave-loaves was burned upon the altar, because nothing leavened was to be placed upon it (Lev 2:11), but they were assigned entirely to the priests, we have only to assume that the same application was intended by the law in the case of the sheaf of first-fruits, since the text only prescribes the waving, and does not contain a word about roasting, rubbing, or burning the grains upon the altar. השּׁבּת מחרת (the morrow after the Sabbath) signifies the next day after the first day of the feast of Mazzoth, i.
e. , the 16th Abib ( Nisan ), not the day of the Sabbath which fell in the seven days’ feast of Mazzoth, as the Baethoseans supposed, still less the 22nd of Nisan, or the day after the conclusion of the seven days’ feast, which always closed with a Sabbath, as Hitzig imagines. The “Sabbath” does not mean the seventh day of the week, but the day of rest, although the weekly Sabbath was always the seventh or last day of the week; hence not only the seventh day of the week (Exo 31:15, etc.)
, but the day of atonement (the tenth of the seventh month), is called “ Sabbath ,” and “ Shabbath shabbathon ” (Lev 23:32; Lev 16:31). As a day of rest, on which no laborious work was to be performed (Lev 23:8), the first day of the feast of Mazzoth is called “ Sabbath ,” irrespectively of the day of the week upon which it fell; and “ the morrow after the Sabbath ” is equivalent to “the morrow after the Passover” mentioned in Jos 5:11, where “Passover” signifies the day at the beginning of which the paschal meal was held, i.
e. , the first day of unleavened bread, which commenced on the evening of the 14th, in other words, the 15th Abib. By offering the sheaf of first-fruits of the harvest, the Israelites were to consecrate their daily bread to the Lord their God, and practically to acknowledge that they owed the blessing of the harvest to the grace of God. They were not to eat any bread or roasted grains of the new corn till they had presented the offering of their God (Lev 23:14).
This offering was fixed for the second day of the feast of the Passover, that the connection between the harvest and the Passover might be kept in subordination to the leading idea of the Passover itself (see at Exo 12:15.) But as the sheaf was not burned upon the altar, but only presented symbolically to the Lord by waving, and then handed over to the priests, an altar-gift had to be connected with it, - namely, a yearling sheep as a burnt-offering, a meat-offering of two-tenths of an ephah of fine flour mixed with oil, and a drink-offering of a quarter of a hin of wine, - to give expression to the obligation and willingness of the congregation not only to enjoy their earthly food, but to strengthen all the members of their body for growth in holiness and diligence in good works.
The burnt-offering, for which a yearling lamb was prescribed, as in fact for all the regular festal sacrifices, was of course in addition to the burnt-offerings prescribed in Num 28:19-20, for every feast-day. The meat-offering, however, was not to consist of one-tenth of an ephah of fine flour, as on other occasions (Exo 29:40; Num 28:9, Num 28:13, etc.) , but of two-tenths, that the offering of corn at the harvest-feast might be a more plentiful one than usual.
Lev 23:5-14 The leading directions for the Passover and feast of Mazzoth are repeated from Exo 12:6, Exo 12:11, Exo 12:15-20. עבדה מלאכת, occupation of a work, signifies labour at some definite occupation, e. g. , the building of the tabernacle, Exo 35:24; Exo 36:1, Exo 36:3; hence occupation in connection with trade or one’s social calling, such as agriculture, handicraft, and so forth; whilst מלאכה is the performance of any kind of work, e.
g. , kindling fire for cooking food (Exo 35:2-3). On the Sabbath and the day of atonement every kind of civil work was prohibited, even to the kindling of fire for the purpose of cooking (Lev 23:3, Lev 23:30, Lev 23:31, cf. Exo 20:10; Exo 31:14; Exo 35:2-3; Deu 5:14 and Lev 16:29; Num 29:7); on the other feast-days with a holy convocation, only servile work (Lev 23:7, Lev 23:8, Lev 23:21, Lev 23:25, Lev 23:35, Lev 23:36, cf.
Exo 12:16, and the explanation on Lev 12:1-8 :15ff. , and Num 28:18, Num 28:25-26; Num 29:1, Num 29:12, Num 29:35). To this there is appended a fresh regulation in Lev 23:9-14, with the repetition of the introductory clause, “ And the Lord spake, ” etc. When the Israelites had come into the land to be given them by the Lord, and had reaped the harvest, they were to bring a sheaf as first-fruits of their harvest to the priest, that he might wave it before Jehovah on the day after the Sabbath, i.
e. , after the first day of Mazzoth . According to Josephus and Philo , it was a sheaf of barley; but this is not expressly commanded, because it would be taken for granted in Canaan, where the harvest began with the barley. In the warmer parts of Palestine the barley ripens about the middle of April, and is reaped in April or the beginning of May, whereas the wheat ripens two or three weeks later ( Seetzen; Robinson 's Pal.
ii. 263, 278). The priest was to wave the sheaf before Jehovah, i. e. , to present it symbolically to Jehovah by the ceremony of waving, without burning any of it upon the altar. The rabbinical rule, viz. , to dry a portion of the ears by the fire, and then, after rubbing them out, to burn them on the altar, was an ordinance of the later scribes, who knew not the law, and was based upon Lev 2:14.
For the law in Lev 2:14 refers to the offerings of first-fruits made by private persons, which are treated of in Num 18:12-13, and Deu 26:2. The sheaf of first-fruits, on the other hand, which was to be offered before Jehovah as a wave-offering in the name of the congregation, corresponded to the two wave-loaves which were leavened and then baked, and were to be presented to the Lord as first-fruits (Lev 23:17).
As no portion of these wave-loaves was burned upon the altar, because nothing leavened was to be placed upon it (Lev 2:11), but they were assigned entirely to the priests, we have only to assume that the same application was intended by the law in the case of the sheaf of first-fruits, since the text only prescribes the waving, and does not contain a word about roasting, rubbing, or burning the grains upon the altar. השּׁבּת מחרת (the morrow after the Sabbath) signifies the next day after the first day of the feast of Mazzoth, i.
e. , the 16th Abib ( Nisan ), not the day of the Sabbath which fell in the seven days’ feast of Mazzoth, as the Baethoseans supposed, still less the 22nd of Nisan, or the day after the conclusion of the seven days’ feast, which always closed with a Sabbath, as Hitzig imagines. The “Sabbath” does not mean the seventh day of the week, but the day of rest, although the weekly Sabbath was always the seventh or last day of the week; hence not only the seventh day of the week (Exo 31:15, etc.)
, but the day of atonement (the tenth of the seventh month), is called “ Sabbath ,” and “ Shabbath shabbathon ” (Lev 23:32; Lev 16:31). As a day of rest, on which no laborious work was to be performed (Lev 23:8), the first day of the feast of Mazzoth is called “ Sabbath ,” irrespectively of the day of the week upon which it fell; and “ the morrow after the Sabbath ” is equivalent to “the morrow after the Passover” mentioned in Jos 5:11, where “Passover” signifies the day at the beginning of which the paschal meal was held, i.
e. , the first day of unleavened bread, which commenced on the evening of the 14th, in other words, the 15th Abib. By offering the sheaf of first-fruits of the harvest, the Israelites were to consecrate their daily bread to the Lord their God, and practically to acknowledge that they owed the blessing of the harvest to the grace of God. They were not to eat any bread or roasted grains of the new corn till they had presented the offering of their God (Lev 23:14).
This offering was fixed for the second day of the feast of the Passover, that the connection between the harvest and the Passover might be kept in subordination to the leading idea of the Passover itself (see at Exo 12:15.) But as the sheaf was not burned upon the altar, but only presented symbolically to the Lord by waving, and then handed over to the priests, an altar-gift had to be connected with it, - namely, a yearling sheep as a burnt-offering, a meat-offering of two-tenths of an ephah of fine flour mixed with oil, and a drink-offering of a quarter of a hin of wine, - to give expression to the obligation and willingness of the congregation not only to enjoy their earthly food, but to strengthen all the members of their body for growth in holiness and diligence in good works.
The burnt-offering, for which a yearling lamb was prescribed, as in fact for all the regular festal sacrifices, was of course in addition to the burnt-offerings prescribed in Num 28:19-20, for every feast-day. The meat-offering, however, was not to consist of one-tenth of an ephah of fine flour, as on other occasions (Exo 29:40; Num 28:9, Num 28:13, etc.) , but of two-tenths, that the offering of corn at the harvest-feast might be a more plentiful one than usual.
Lev 23:5-14 The leading directions for the Passover and feast of Mazzoth are repeated from Exo 12:6, Exo 12:11, Exo 12:15-20. עבדה מלאכת, occupation of a work, signifies labour at some definite occupation, e. g. , the building of the tabernacle, Exo 35:24; Exo 36:1, Exo 36:3; hence occupation in connection with trade or one’s social calling, such as agriculture, handicraft, and so forth; whilst מלאכה is the performance of any kind of work, e.
g. , kindling fire for cooking food (Exo 35:2-3). On the Sabbath and the day of atonement every kind of civil work was prohibited, even to the kindling of fire for the purpose of cooking (Lev 23:3, Lev 23:30, Lev 23:31, cf. Exo 20:10; Exo 31:14; Exo 35:2-3; Deu 5:14 and Lev 16:29; Num 29:7); on the other feast-days with a holy convocation, only servile work (Lev 23:7, Lev 23:8, Lev 23:21, Lev 23:25, Lev 23:35, Lev 23:36, cf.
Exo 12:16, and the explanation on Lev 12:1-8 :15ff. , and Num 28:18, Num 28:25-26; Num 29:1, Num 29:12, Num 29:35). To this there is appended a fresh regulation in Lev 23:9-14, with the repetition of the introductory clause, “ And the Lord spake, ” etc. When the Israelites had come into the land to be given them by the Lord, and had reaped the harvest, they were to bring a sheaf as first-fruits of their harvest to the priest, that he might wave it before Jehovah on the day after the Sabbath, i.
e. , after the first day of Mazzoth . According to Josephus and Philo , it was a sheaf of barley; but this is not expressly commanded, because it would be taken for granted in Canaan, where the harvest began with the barley. In the warmer parts of Palestine the barley ripens about the middle of April, and is reaped in April or the beginning of May, whereas the wheat ripens two or three weeks later ( Seetzen; Robinson 's Pal.
ii. 263, 278). The priest was to wave the sheaf before Jehovah, i. e. , to present it symbolically to Jehovah by the ceremony of waving, without burning any of it upon the altar. The rabbinical rule, viz. , to dry a portion of the ears by the fire, and then, after rubbing them out, to burn them on the altar, was an ordinance of the later scribes, who knew not the law, and was based upon Lev 2:14.
For the law in Lev 2:14 refers to the offerings of first-fruits made by private persons, which are treated of in Num 18:12-13, and Deu 26:2. The sheaf of first-fruits, on the other hand, which was to be offered before Jehovah as a wave-offering in the name of the congregation, corresponded to the two wave-loaves which were leavened and then baked, and were to be presented to the Lord as first-fruits (Lev 23:17).
As no portion of these wave-loaves was burned upon the altar, because nothing leavened was to be placed upon it (Lev 2:11), but they were assigned entirely to the priests, we have only to assume that the same application was intended by the law in the case of the sheaf of first-fruits, since the text only prescribes the waving, and does not contain a word about roasting, rubbing, or burning the grains upon the altar. השּׁבּת מחרת (the morrow after the Sabbath) signifies the next day after the first day of the feast of Mazzoth, i.
e. , the 16th Abib ( Nisan ), not the day of the Sabbath which fell in the seven days’ feast of Mazzoth, as the Baethoseans supposed, still less the 22nd of Nisan, or the day after the conclusion of the seven days’ feast, which always closed with a Sabbath, as Hitzig imagines. The “Sabbath” does not mean the seventh day of the week, but the day of rest, although the weekly Sabbath was always the seventh or last day of the week; hence not only the seventh day of the week (Exo 31:15, etc.)
, but the day of atonement (the tenth of the seventh month), is called “ Sabbath ,” and “ Shabbath shabbathon ” (Lev 23:32; Lev 16:31). As a day of rest, on which no laborious work was to be performed (Lev 23:8), the first day of the feast of Mazzoth is called “ Sabbath ,” irrespectively of the day of the week upon which it fell; and “ the morrow after the Sabbath ” is equivalent to “the morrow after the Passover” mentioned in Jos 5:11, where “Passover” signifies the day at the beginning of which the paschal meal was held, i.
e. , the first day of unleavened bread, which commenced on the evening of the 14th, in other words, the 15th Abib. By offering the sheaf of first-fruits of the harvest, the Israelites were to consecrate their daily bread to the Lord their God, and practically to acknowledge that they owed the blessing of the harvest to the grace of God. They were not to eat any bread or roasted grains of the new corn till they had presented the offering of their God (Lev 23:14).
This offering was fixed for the second day of the feast of the Passover, that the connection between the harvest and the Passover might be kept in subordination to the leading idea of the Passover itself (see at Exo 12:15.) But as the sheaf was not burned upon the altar, but only presented symbolically to the Lord by waving, and then handed over to the priests, an altar-gift had to be connected with it, - namely, a yearling sheep as a burnt-offering, a meat-offering of two-tenths of an ephah of fine flour mixed with oil, and a drink-offering of a quarter of a hin of wine, - to give expression to the obligation and willingness of the congregation not only to enjoy their earthly food, but to strengthen all the members of their body for growth in holiness and diligence in good works.
The burnt-offering, for which a yearling lamb was prescribed, as in fact for all the regular festal sacrifices, was of course in addition to the burnt-offerings prescribed in Num 28:19-20, for every feast-day. The meat-offering, however, was not to consist of one-tenth of an ephah of fine flour, as on other occasions (Exo 29:40; Num 28:9, Num 28:13, etc.) , but of two-tenths, that the offering of corn at the harvest-feast might be a more plentiful one than usual.
Lev 23:5-14 The leading directions for the Passover and feast of Mazzoth are repeated from Exo 12:6, Exo 12:11, Exo 12:15-20. עבדה מלאכת, occupation of a work, signifies labour at some definite occupation, e. g. , the building of the tabernacle, Exo 35:24; Exo 36:1, Exo 36:3; hence occupation in connection with trade or one’s social calling, such as agriculture, handicraft, and so forth; whilst מלאכה is the performance of any kind of work, e.
g. , kindling fire for cooking food (Exo 35:2-3). On the Sabbath and the day of atonement every kind of civil work was prohibited, even to the kindling of fire for the purpose of cooking (Lev 23:3, Lev 23:30, Lev 23:31, cf. Exo 20:10; Exo 31:14; Exo 35:2-3; Deu 5:14 and Lev 16:29; Num 29:7); on the other feast-days with a holy convocation, only servile work (Lev 23:7, Lev 23:8, Lev 23:21, Lev 23:25, Lev 23:35, Lev 23:36, cf.
Exo 12:16, and the explanation on Lev 12:1-8 :15ff. , and Num 28:18, Num 28:25-26; Num 29:1, Num 29:12, Num 29:35). To this there is appended a fresh regulation in Lev 23:9-14, with the repetition of the introductory clause, “ And the Lord spake, ” etc. When the Israelites had come into the land to be given them by the Lord, and had reaped the harvest, they were to bring a sheaf as first-fruits of their harvest to the priest, that he might wave it before Jehovah on the day after the Sabbath, i.
e. , after the first day of Mazzoth . According to Josephus and Philo , it was a sheaf of barley; but this is not expressly commanded, because it would be taken for granted in Canaan, where the harvest began with the barley. In the warmer parts of Palestine the barley ripens about the middle of April, and is reaped in April or the beginning of May, whereas the wheat ripens two or three weeks later ( Seetzen; Robinson 's Pal.
ii. 263, 278). The priest was to wave the sheaf before Jehovah, i. e. , to present it symbolically to Jehovah by the ceremony of waving, without burning any of it upon the altar. The rabbinical rule, viz. , to dry a portion of the ears by the fire, and then, after rubbing them out, to burn them on the altar, was an ordinance of the later scribes, who knew not the law, and was based upon Lev 2:14.
For the law in Lev 2:14 refers to the offerings of first-fruits made by private persons, which are treated of in Num 18:12-13, and Deu 26:2. The sheaf of first-fruits, on the other hand, which was to be offered before Jehovah as a wave-offering in the name of the congregation, corresponded to the two wave-loaves which were leavened and then baked, and were to be presented to the Lord as first-fruits (Lev 23:17).
As no portion of these wave-loaves was burned upon the altar, because nothing leavened was to be placed upon it (Lev 2:11), but they were assigned entirely to the priests, we have only to assume that the same application was intended by the law in the case of the sheaf of first-fruits, since the text only prescribes the waving, and does not contain a word about roasting, rubbing, or burning the grains upon the altar. השּׁבּת מחרת (the morrow after the Sabbath) signifies the next day after the first day of the feast of Mazzoth, i.
e. , the 16th Abib ( Nisan ), not the day of the Sabbath which fell in the seven days’ feast of Mazzoth, as the Baethoseans supposed, still less the 22nd of Nisan, or the day after the conclusion of the seven days’ feast, which always closed with a Sabbath, as Hitzig imagines. The “Sabbath” does not mean the seventh day of the week, but the day of rest, although the weekly Sabbath was always the seventh or last day of the week; hence not only the seventh day of the week (Exo 31:15, etc.)
, but the day of atonement (the tenth of the seventh month), is called “ Sabbath ,” and “ Shabbath shabbathon ” (Lev 23:32; Lev 16:31). As a day of rest, on which no laborious work was to be performed (Lev 23:8), the first day of the feast of Mazzoth is called “ Sabbath ,” irrespectively of the day of the week upon which it fell; and “ the morrow after the Sabbath ” is equivalent to “the morrow after the Passover” mentioned in Jos 5:11, where “Passover” signifies the day at the beginning of which the paschal meal was held, i.
e. , the first day of unleavened bread, which commenced on the evening of the 14th, in other words, the 15th Abib. By offering the sheaf of first-fruits of the harvest, the Israelites were to consecrate their daily bread to the Lord their God, and practically to acknowledge that they owed the blessing of the harvest to the grace of God. They were not to eat any bread or roasted grains of the new corn till they had presented the offering of their God (Lev 23:14).
This offering was fixed for the second day of the feast of the Passover, that the connection between the harvest and the Passover might be kept in subordination to the leading idea of the Passover itself (see at Exo 12:15.) But as the sheaf was not burned upon the altar, but only presented symbolically to the Lord by waving, and then handed over to the priests, an altar-gift had to be connected with it, - namely, a yearling sheep as a burnt-offering, a meat-offering of two-tenths of an ephah of fine flour mixed with oil, and a drink-offering of a quarter of a hin of wine, - to give expression to the obligation and willingness of the congregation not only to enjoy their earthly food, but to strengthen all the members of their body for growth in holiness and diligence in good works.
The burnt-offering, for which a yearling lamb was prescribed, as in fact for all the regular festal sacrifices, was of course in addition to the burnt-offerings prescribed in Num 28:19-20, for every feast-day. The meat-offering, however, was not to consist of one-tenth of an ephah of fine flour, as on other occasions (Exo 29:40; Num 28:9, Num 28:13, etc.) , but of two-tenths, that the offering of corn at the harvest-feast might be a more plentiful one than usual.
Lev 23:5-14 The leading directions for the Passover and feast of Mazzoth are repeated from Exo 12:6, Exo 12:11, Exo 12:15-20. עבדה מלאכת, occupation of a work, signifies labour at some definite occupation, e. g. , the building of the tabernacle, Exo 35:24; Exo 36:1, Exo 36:3; hence occupation in connection with trade or one’s social calling, such as agriculture, handicraft, and so forth; whilst מלאכה is the performance of any kind of work, e.
g. , kindling fire for cooking food (Exo 35:2-3). On the Sabbath and the day of atonement every kind of civil work was prohibited, even to the kindling of fire for the purpose of cooking (Lev 23:3, Lev 23:30, Lev 23:31, cf. Exo 20:10; Exo 31:14; Exo 35:2-3; Deu 5:14 and Lev 16:29; Num 29:7); on the other feast-days with a holy convocation, only servile work (Lev 23:7, Lev 23:8, Lev 23:21, Lev 23:25, Lev 23:35, Lev 23:36, cf.
Exo 12:16, and the explanation on Lev 12:1-8 :15ff. , and Num 28:18, Num 28:25-26; Num 29:1, Num 29:12, Num 29:35). To this there is appended a fresh regulation in Lev 23:9-14, with the repetition of the introductory clause, “ And the Lord spake, ” etc. When the Israelites had come into the land to be given them by the Lord, and had reaped the harvest, they were to bring a sheaf as first-fruits of their harvest to the priest, that he might wave it before Jehovah on the day after the Sabbath, i.
e. , after the first day of Mazzoth . According to Josephus and Philo , it was a sheaf of barley; but this is not expressly commanded, because it would be taken for granted in Canaan, where the harvest began with the barley. In the warmer parts of Palestine the barley ripens about the middle of April, and is reaped in April or the beginning of May, whereas the wheat ripens two or three weeks later ( Seetzen; Robinson 's Pal.
ii. 263, 278). The priest was to wave the sheaf before Jehovah, i. e. , to present it symbolically to Jehovah by the ceremony of waving, without burning any of it upon the altar. The rabbinical rule, viz. , to dry a portion of the ears by the fire, and then, after rubbing them out, to burn them on the altar, was an ordinance of the later scribes, who knew not the law, and was based upon Lev 2:14.
For the law in Lev 2:14 refers to the offerings of first-fruits made by private persons, which are treated of in Num 18:12-13, and Deu 26:2. The sheaf of first-fruits, on the other hand, which was to be offered before Jehovah as a wave-offering in the name of the congregation, corresponded to the two wave-loaves which were leavened and then baked, and were to be presented to the Lord as first-fruits (Lev 23:17).
As no portion of these wave-loaves was burned upon the altar, because nothing leavened was to be placed upon it (Lev 2:11), but they were assigned entirely to the priests, we have only to assume that the same application was intended by the law in the case of the sheaf of first-fruits, since the text only prescribes the waving, and does not contain a word about roasting, rubbing, or burning the grains upon the altar. השּׁבּת מחרת (the morrow after the Sabbath) signifies the next day after the first day of the feast of Mazzoth, i.
e. , the 16th Abib ( Nisan ), not the day of the Sabbath which fell in the seven days’ feast of Mazzoth, as the Baethoseans supposed, still less the 22nd of Nisan, or the day after the conclusion of the seven days’ feast, which always closed with a Sabbath, as Hitzig imagines. The “Sabbath” does not mean the seventh day of the week, but the day of rest, although the weekly Sabbath was always the seventh or last day of the week; hence not only the seventh day of the week (Exo 31:15, etc.)
, but the day of atonement (the tenth of the seventh month), is called “ Sabbath ,” and “ Shabbath shabbathon ” (Lev 23:32; Lev 16:31). As a day of rest, on which no laborious work was to be performed (Lev 23:8), the first day of the feast of Mazzoth is called “ Sabbath ,” irrespectively of the day of the week upon which it fell; and “ the morrow after the Sabbath ” is equivalent to “the morrow after the Passover” mentioned in Jos 5:11, where “Passover” signifies the day at the beginning of which the paschal meal was held, i.
e. , the first day of unleavened bread, which commenced on the evening of the 14th, in other words, the 15th Abib. By offering the sheaf of first-fruits of the harvest, the Israelites were to consecrate their daily bread to the Lord their God, and practically to acknowledge that they owed the blessing of the harvest to the grace of God. They were not to eat any bread or roasted grains of the new corn till they had presented the offering of their God (Lev 23:14).
This offering was fixed for the second day of the feast of the Passover, that the connection between the harvest and the Passover might be kept in subordination to the leading idea of the Passover itself (see at Exo 12:15.) But as the sheaf was not burned upon the altar, but only presented symbolically to the Lord by waving, and then handed over to the priests, an altar-gift had to be connected with it, - namely, a yearling sheep as a burnt-offering, a meat-offering of two-tenths of an ephah of fine flour mixed with oil, and a drink-offering of a quarter of a hin of wine, - to give expression to the obligation and willingness of the congregation not only to enjoy their earthly food, but to strengthen all the members of their body for growth in holiness and diligence in good works.
The burnt-offering, for which a yearling lamb was prescribed, as in fact for all the regular festal sacrifices, was of course in addition to the burnt-offerings prescribed in Num 28:19-20, for every feast-day. The meat-offering, however, was not to consist of one-tenth of an ephah of fine flour, as on other occasions (Exo 29:40; Num 28:9, Num 28:13, etc.) , but of two-tenths, that the offering of corn at the harvest-feast might be a more plentiful one than usual.
Lev 23:15-17 The law for the special observance of the feast of Harvest (Exo 23:16) is added here without any fresh introductory formula, to show at the very outset the close connection between the two feasts. Seven whole weeks, or fifty days, were to be reckoned from the day of the offering of the sheaf, and then the day of first-fruits (Num 28:26) or feast of Weeks (Exo 34:22; Deu 16:10) was to be celebrated.
From this reckoning the feast received the name of Pentecost (ἡ πεντηκοστή, Act 2:1). That שׁבּתות (Lev 23:15) signifies weeks, like שׁבעות in Deu 16:9, and τὰ σάββατα in the Gospels (e. g. , Mat 28:1), is evident from the predicate תּמימת, “complete,” which would be quite unsuitable if Sabbath-days were intended, as a long period might be reckoned by half weeks instead of whole, but certainly not by half Sabbath-days.
Consequently “the morrow after the seventh Sabbath” (Lev 23:16) is the day after the seventh week, not after the seventh Sabbath. On this day, i. e. , fifty days after the first day of Mazzoth , Israel was to offer a new meat-offering to the Lord, i. e. , made of the fruit of the new harvest (Lev 26:10), “wave-loaves” from its dwellings, two of two-tenths of an ephah of fine flour baked leavened, like the bread which served for their daily food, “as first-fruits unto the Lord,” and of the wheat-harvest (Exo 34:22), which fell in the second half of May and the first weeks of June (Robinson , Palestine ), and therefore was finished as a whole by the feast of Weeks.
The loaves differed from all the other meat-offerings, being made of leavened dough, because in them their daily bread was offered to the Lord, who had blessed the harvest, as a thank-offering for His blessing. They were therefore only given to the Lord symbolically by waving, and were then to belong to the priests (Lev 23:20). The injunction “out of your habitations” is not to be understood, as Calvin and others suppose, as signifying that every householder was to present two such loaves; it simply expresses the idea, that they were to be loaves made for the daily food of a household, and not prepared expressly for holy purposes.