In the sorrow of Sarah’s death, Abraham acts in faith by securing a burial place in the promised land, showing that even in grief He remains anchored in God’s covenant future.
Sarah Dies, Abraham Secures a Burial Place, and the Promise Takes Hold in the Land Through Faithful Patience
In the sorrow of Sarah’s death, Abraham acts in faith by securing a burial place in the promised land, showing that even in grief He remains anchored in God’s covenant future.
Reading a chapter
What this page is: Each chapter page shows the big idea, the argument flow, key original-language terms, doctrine connections, and passage units, all in one place.
How to use it: Start with the Overview tab to get the chapter's main point. Then move to Passages to study individual units, or Language to trace key terms.
Going deeper: The Doctrines and Motifs tabs show how this chapter connects to the broader biblical story.
In the sorrow of Sarah’s death, Abraham acts in faith by securing a burial place in the promised land, showing that even in grief He remains anchored in God’s covenant future.
Genesis 23 teaches that covenant faith remains steady not only in moments of promise and triumph, but also in the face of death, grief, and delayed inheritance. Sarah’s death is real and deeply felt. Abraham mourns and weeps, and the chapter does not minimize the sorrow of loss. Yet grief does not erase promise. Instead, Abraham’s actions show that He still lives under God’s word.
He seeks burial not back in Mesopotamia, but in Canaan, the land God promised. This is theologically decisive. Abraham’s purchase of Machpelah is more than practical real estate acquisition; it is an act of covenant conviction. Though He does not yet possess the land broadly, He secures a legally recognized foothold in it, and that foothold is connected to burial, memory, and future inheritance.
His refusal to receive the field as a vague favor and His insistence on a formal purchase demonstrate wisdom, integrity, and faithfulness. The covenant line is not to rest on informal goodwill but on a clear, public, legal possession. The repeated emphasis on witnesses, boundaries, trees, field, and cave underscores the permanence and legitimacy of the transaction.
Thus the chapter argues that God’s promise is not nullified by death, that faith can act with sober realism and future hope at the same time, and that even a grave in the promised land can function as a testimony that God’s word still governs the future of His people.
Genesis 23 marks the first recorded death within Abraham’s immediate covenant household and stands as a significant turning point in the patriarchal narrative. After the climactic testing and covenant confirmation of Genesis 22, the narrative now moves into grief, burial, land, and inheritance realities. Sarah, the mother of the promised son, dies in Canaan, and Abraham must secure a burial site for her.
This chapter is historically and theologically important because it records Abraham’s first legally recognized possession in the promised land, not as a king taking territory by conquest, but as a sojourner purchasing a burial field. Within Genesis, this creates a powerful tension: God has promised Abraham and His seed the land, yet Abraham still lives as an alien and must buy a tomb in it.
The chapter therefore shows that covenant faith often lives between promise and possession, inheritance and waiting. It also establishes Machpelah as a key family burial site, tying the covenant family bodily to the land of promise and reinforcing the future-oriented hope that God’s word concerning the land will surely stand.
Sarah dies at Kiriath Arba, that is Hebron, in the land of Canaan, and Abraham comes to mourn and weep for her.
Abraham rises from before His dead and addresses the Hittites, identifying Himself as a sojourner and foreigner among them and requesting a burial property. The Hittites respond with respect, calling Him a mighty prince among them and offering access to their best tombs.
Abraham bows, requests specifically the cave of Machpelah from Ephron son of Zohar, and insists on paying the full price rather than receiving it as a gift. Ephron publicly names the price, and Abraham weighs out the silver according to the merchant standard before the witnesses.
The field of Ephron in Machpelah near Mamre, including the cave and all the trees within its boundaries, is formally transferred to Abraham as a possession in the presence of the Hittites.
Abraham buries Sarah in the cave of the field of Machpelah near Mamre, that is Hebron, in the land of Canaan, and the field and cave are confirmed to Abraham as burial property from the Hittites.
- 23:1–2: Sarah dies at Kiriath Arba, that is Hebron, in the land of Canaan, and Abraham comes to mourn and weep for her.
- 23:3–6: Abraham rises from before His dead and addresses the Hittites, identifying Himself as a sojourner and foreigner among them and requesting a burial property. The Hittites respond with respect, calling Him a mighty prince among them and offering access to their best tombs.
- 23:7–16: Abraham bows, requests specifically the cave of Machpelah from Ephron son of Zohar, and insists on paying the full price rather than receiving it as a gift. Ephron publicly names the price, and Abraham weighs out the silver according to the merchant standard before the witnesses.
- 23:17–18: The field of Ephron in Machpelah near Mamre, including the cave and all the trees within its boundaries, is formally transferred to Abraham as a possession in the presence of the Hittites.
- 23:19–20: Abraham buries Sarah in the cave of the field of Machpelah near Mamre, that is Hebron, in the land of Canaan, and the field and cave are confirmed to Abraham as burial property from the Hittites.
Theological Focus
- Faith in Grief
- Land Promise
- Covenant Patience
- Death and Hope
- Pilgrimage
- Integrity
- Public Witness
- Future Inheritance
- Covenant Theology
- Providence
- Faith
- Biblical Theology
Covenant Significance
Genesis 23 is covenantally significant because it records the first formal land possession Abraham acquires in Canaan. Although small in scope, the cave of Machpelah becomes immensely important as a covenant-family burial site and as a concrete token of the promised inheritance. The chapter shows that Abraham’s hope is rooted in the land God pledged, even though He remains a sojourner for now.
It also binds Sarah permanently to the land of promise, which reinforces the unity of the covenant family and the seriousness of God’s territorial pledge. The chapter therefore advances the Abrahamic covenant by showing that promise can begin to take embodied, legal shape even before its wider fulfillment.
Canonical Connections
Genesis 23 is covenantally significant because it records the first formal land possession Abraham acquires in Canaan. Although small in scope, the cave of Machpelah becomes immensely important as a covenant-family burial site and as a concrete token of the promised inheritance. The chapter shows that Abraham’s hope is rooted in the land God pledged, even though He remains a sojourner for now.
It also binds Sarah permanently to the land of promise, which reinforces the unity of the covenant family and the seriousness of God’s territorial pledge. The chapter therefore advances the Abrahamic covenant by showing that promise can begin to take embodied, legal shape even before its wider fulfillment.
Genesis 12:1-7
Genesis 17:1-8
Genesis 49:29-32
Genesis 50:13
Joshua 24:32
Genesis 22:1-24
Genesis 24:1-67
Genesis 49:29-32
Hebrews 11:13-16
Cross References
These all died in faith, not having received the promises, but having seen them and embraced them from afar, and having confessed that they were strangers and pilgrims on the earth.
They buried the bones of Joseph, which the children of Israel brought up out of Egypt, in Shechem, in the parcel of ground which Jacob bought from the sons of Hamor the father of Shechem for a hundred pieces of silver. They became the...
Genesis 23 does not announce the gospel directly, but it strengthens its framework. Sarah dies, Abraham grieves, and yet the covenant promise does not die with her. Instead, Abraham secures a burial place in the promised land, acting as one who believes that God’s future is still certain even in the face of death. This prepares the way for the fuller biblical hope that God’s promises are stronger than the grave.
In the fullness of Scripture, that hope is secured in Jesus Christ, the true seed, who conquers death and guarantees the inheritance of His people.
Primary Emphasis
Genesis 23 contributes to Christology indirectly by deepening the pattern that God’s promise persists through death and beyond immediate visible fulfillment. The covenant line does not collapse when Sarah dies, because God’s purposes are larger than one lifetime and stronger than the grave. The burial in the promised land points toward a future inheritance not canceled by death.
In the larger canonical frame, this helps prepare the theological world in which resurrection hope and final inheritance come into sharper focus. Christ, as the ultimate seed, brings the decisive victory over death and secures the inheritance toward which chapters like this quietly point.
Chapter Contribution
Genesis 23 teaches that covenant faith remains steady not only in moments of promise and triumph, but also in the face of death, grief, and delayed inheritance. Sarah’s death is real and deeply felt. Abraham mourns and weeps, and the chapter does not minimize the sorrow of loss. Yet grief does not erase promise. Instead, Abraham’s actions show that He still lives under God’s word.
He seeks burial not back in Mesopotamia, but in Canaan, the land God promised. This is theologically decisive. Abraham’s purchase of Machpelah is more than practical real estate acquisition; it is an act of covenant conviction. Though He does not yet possess the land broadly, He secures a legally recognized foothold in it, and that foothold is connected to burial, memory, and future inheritance.
His refusal to receive the field as a vague favor and His insistence on a formal purchase demonstrate wisdom, integrity, and faithfulness. The covenant line is not to rest on informal goodwill but on a clear, public, legal possession. The repeated emphasis on witnesses, boundaries, trees, field, and cave underscores the permanence and legitimacy of the transaction.
Thus the chapter argues that God’s promise is not nullified by death, that faith can act with sober realism and future hope at the same time, and that even a grave in the promised land can function as a testimony that God’s word still governs the future of His people.
Faith acts in the present based on future promises.
Death does not nullify God’s promises but points toward future fulfillment.
God’s promises are progressively realized through history.
God works through ordinary transactions to accomplish His purposes.
3 Imperatives
- Give me a burial possession among You
- Listen and deal openly in the sight of witnesses
- Act faithfully in grief under the promise of God
Sense sojourner and foreign resident
Definition sojourner and foreign resident
Why it matters Abraham’s self-description captures the tension of covenant existence: He lives in the promised land, yet not yet as full possessor of it.
Sense burial possession, burial holding
Definition burial possession, burial holding
Why it matters This phrase is central to the chapter because it expresses Abraham’s first formal possession in the promised land, though only as a burial site.
Sense Machpelah
Definition Machpelah
Why it matters Machpelah becomes the covenant-family tomb and a concrete testimony that Abraham’s family is tied to the land of promise.
Sense silver current with the merchant
Definition silver current with the merchant
Why it matters The commercial precision highlights Abraham’s integrity and the legal permanence of the purchase.
Sense field
Definition field
Why it matters The repeated field-language underscores that this is not vague sentiment but specific and transferred land possession.
Sense cave
Definition cave
Why it matters The cave functions as the burial place that anchors the covenant family bodily in the promised land.
Sense Hebron
Definition Hebron
Why it matters Hebron is repeatedly identified to locate the burial within the land of Canaan, stressing geography as covenantally meaningful.
Sense land of Canaan
Definition land of Canaan
Why it matters The repeated mention of Canaan emphasizes that Sarah’s burial and Abraham’s purchase take place precisely in the land God promised.
Sense and he wept
Definition and he wept
Why it matters Abraham’s weeping shows that covenant faith does not cancel real grief, but carries grief within hope.
Sense rise, stand up
Definition rise, stand up
Why it matters Abraham’s rising from before His dead marks the transition from grief to faithful action under covenant hope.
Sense people of the land
Definition people of the land
Why it matters The public witness of the land’s inhabitants reinforces the legitimacy and communal recognition of Abraham’s purchase.
Lexicon data: MorphGNT Strong's Dictionary XML (CC0) · Open Scriptures Hebrew Bible (CC BY 4.0) · Open Scriptures Hebrew Lexicon (CC BY 4.0) · STEPBible Data (CC BY 4.0) · Full details
C.F. Keil & F. Delitzsch, Commentary on the Old Testament (1861–91) — public domain
- Genesis 23 warns against living as though death nullifies God’s promise, and against treating grief as though covenant hope has no place within it.
- Treating the chapter as merely a real estate transaction rather than as a major covenantal moment of first possession in the promised land.
- Reading Abraham’s mourning as weakness instead of seeing it as faithful grief held together with covenant hope.
- Ignoring the importance of Sarah being buried in Canaan and thus missing the chapter’s land-theology significance.
- Assuming Abraham’s purchase reflects unbelief because He did not simply seize the land, rather than recognizing the chapter’s emphasis on patient faith and public integrity.
- Overlooking the legal and witnessed nature of the transaction, which is central to the permanence of the possession.
- Missing the fact that burial in the promised land testifies that the covenant future extends beyond the immediate span of one life.
- How does Abraham’s response to Sarah’s death help You think about grieving honestly while still resting in God’s promises?
- Are there places in Your life where You want full possession now instead of learning patient faithfulness under partial fulfillment?
- What can You learn from Abraham’s integrity and public clarity in His dealings with the Hittites?
- Do You live as though death has the last word, or as though God’s promise extends beyond what You can presently see?
- What 'small footholds' of obedience and faith might God be calling You to take while You still wait for larger fulfillment?
- Preach Genesis 23 to help believers grieve truthfully without surrendering covenant hope.
- Use Abraham’s purchase of Machpelah to show that faith often expresses itself through sober, practical, legally clear action rather than dramatic spectacle.
- Teach that God’s promises may be only partially visible in our lifetime, yet that does not make them uncertain.
- Encourage believers to think long-term and generationally, recognizing that the promises of God often outrun the lifespan of the individual saint.
- Show how public integrity in business, property, and witness matters deeply for those who live under God’s name.
- Help the church see that burial, memory, and bodily location in Scripture can carry theological meaning tied to hope and inheritance.
- Comfort the bereaved with the truth that death can wound deeply without overturning the future God has spoken.
Genesis 23 does not announce the gospel directly, but it strengthens its framework. Sarah dies, Abraham grieves, and yet the covenant promise does not die with her. Instead, Abraham secures a burial place in the promised land, acting as one who believes that God’s future is still certain even in the face of death. This prepares the way for the fuller biblical hope that God’s promises are stronger than the grave.
In the fullness of Scripture, that hope is secured in Jesus Christ, the true seed, who conquers death and guarantees the inheritance of His people.
Genesis 23 does not announce the gospel directly, but it strengthens its framework. Sarah dies, Abraham grieves, and yet the covenant promise does not die with her. Instead, Abraham secures a burial place in the promised land, acting as one who believes that God’s future is still certain even in the face of death. This prepares the way for the fuller biblical hope that God’s promises are stronger than the grave.
In the fullness of Scripture, that hope is secured in Jesus Christ, the true seed, who conquers death and guarantees the inheritance of His people.
Genesis 23 does not announce the gospel directly, but it strengthens its framework. Sarah dies, Abraham grieves, and yet the covenant promise does not die with her. Instead, Abraham secures a burial place in the promised land, acting as one who believes that God’s future is still certain even in the face of death. This prepares the way for the fuller biblical hope that God’s promises are stronger than the grave.
In the fullness of Scripture, that hope is secured in Jesus Christ, the true seed, who conquers death and guarantees the inheritance of His people.
Genesis 23 does not announce the gospel directly, but it strengthens its framework. Sarah dies, Abraham grieves, and yet the covenant promise does not die with her. Instead, Abraham secures a burial place in the promised land, acting as one who believes that God’s future is still certain even in the face of death. This prepares the way for the fuller biblical hope that God’s promises are stronger than the grave.
In the fullness of Scripture, that hope is secured in Jesus Christ, the true seed, who conquers death and guarantees the inheritance of His people.
Genesis 23 does not announce the gospel directly, but it strengthens its framework. Sarah dies, Abraham grieves, and yet the covenant promise does not die with her. Instead, Abraham secures a burial place in the promised land, acting as one who believes that God’s future is still certain even in the face of death. This prepares the way for the fuller biblical hope that God’s promises are stronger than the grave.
In the fullness of Scripture, that hope is secured in Jesus Christ, the true seed, who conquers death and guarantees the inheritance of His people.
3
Moderate
- Give me a burial possession among You
- Listen and deal openly in the sight of witnesses
- Act faithfully in grief under the promise of God
The Biblical World
Chapter At A Glance
Genesis 23 is covenantally significant because it records the first formal land possession Abraham acquires in Canaan. Although small in scope, the cave of Machpelah becomes immensely important as a covenant-family burial site and as a concrete token of the promised inheritance. The chapter shows that Abraham’s hope is rooted in the land God pledged, even though He remains a sojourner for now.
It also binds Sarah permanently to the land of promise, which reinforces the unity of the covenant family and the seriousness of God’s territorial pledge. The chapter therefore advances the Abrahamic covenant by showing that promise can begin to take embodied, legal shape even before its wider fulfillment.
Genesis 23 does not announce the gospel directly, but it strengthens its framework. Sarah dies, Abraham grieves, and yet the covenant promise does not die with her. Instead, Abraham secures a burial place in the promised land, acting as one who believes that God’s future is still certain even in the face of death. This prepares the way for the fuller biblical hope that God’s promises are stronger than the grave.
In the fullness of Scripture, that hope is secured in Jesus Christ, the true seed, who conquers death and guarantees the inheritance of His people.
Focus Points
- Faith in Grief
- Land Promise
- Covenant Patience
- Death and Hope
- Pilgrimage
- Integrity
- Public Witness
- Future Inheritance
- Covenant Theology
- Providence
- Faith
- Biblical Theology
Cross References
Passages
Chapter opening: Genesis 23:1-20
Gen 23:1-2 Sarah is the only woman whose age is mentioned in the Scriptures, because as the mother of the promised seed she became the mother of all believers (1Pe 3:6). She died at the age of 127, thirty-seven years after the birth of Isaac, at Hebron, or rather in the grove of Mamre near that city (Gen 13:18), whither Abraham had once more returned after a lengthened stay at Beersheba (Gen 22:19).
The name Kirjath Arba, i. e. , the city of Arba, which Hebron bears here and also in Gen 35:27, and other passages, and which it still bore at the time of the conquest of Canaan by the Israelites (Jos 14:15), was not the original name of the city, but was first given to it by Arba the Anakite and his family, who had not yet arrived there in the time of the patriarchs.
It was probably given by them when they took possession of the city, and remained until the Israelites captured it and restored the original name. The place still exists, as a small town on the road from Jerusalem to Beersheba, in a valley surrounded by several mountains, and is called by the Arabs, with allusion to Abraham’s stay there, el Khalil , i. e. , the friend (of God), which is the title given to Abraham by the Mohammedans.
The clause “ in the land of Canaan ” denotes, that not only did Sarah die in the land of promise, but Abraham as a foreigner acquired a burial-place by purchase there. “ And Abraham came ” (not from Beersheba, but from the field where he may have been with the flocks), “ to mourn for Sarah and to weep for her, ” i. e. , to arrange for the customary mourning ceremony.
Gen 23:1-2 Sarah is the only woman whose age is mentioned in the Scriptures, because as the mother of the promised seed she became the mother of all believers (1Pe 3:6). She died at the age of 127, thirty-seven years after the birth of Isaac, at Hebron, or rather in the grove of Mamre near that city (Gen 13:18), whither Abraham had once more returned after a lengthened stay at Beersheba (Gen 22:19).
The name Kirjath Arba, i. e. , the city of Arba, which Hebron bears here and also in Gen 35:27, and other passages, and which it still bore at the time of the conquest of Canaan by the Israelites (Jos 14:15), was not the original name of the city, but was first given to it by Arba the Anakite and his family, who had not yet arrived there in the time of the patriarchs.
It was probably given by them when they took possession of the city, and remained until the Israelites captured it and restored the original name. The place still exists, as a small town on the road from Jerusalem to Beersheba, in a valley surrounded by several mountains, and is called by the Arabs, with allusion to Abraham’s stay there, el Khalil , i. e. , the friend (of God), which is the title given to Abraham by the Mohammedans.
The clause “ in the land of Canaan ” denotes, that not only did Sarah die in the land of promise, but Abraham as a foreigner acquired a burial-place by purchase there. “ And Abraham came ” (not from Beersheba, but from the field where he may have been with the flocks), “ to mourn for Sarah and to weep for her, ” i. e. , to arrange for the customary mourning ceremony.
Gen 23:3-16 He then went to the Hittites, the lords and possessors of the city and its vicinity at that time, to procure from them “a possession of a burying-place. ” The negotiations were carried on in the most formal style, in a public assembly “of the people of the land,” i. e. , of natives (Gen 23:7), in the gate of the city (Gen 23:10). As a foreigner and sojourner, Abraham presented his request in the most courteous manner to all the citizens (“all that went in at the gate,” Gen 23:10, Gen 23:18; a phrase interchangeable with “all that went out at the gate,” Gen 34:24, and those who “go out and in,” Jer 17:19).
The citizens with the greatest readiness and respect offered “the prince of God,” i. e. , the man exalted by God to the rank of a prince, “the choice” (מבחר, i. e. , the most select) of their graves for his use (Gen 23:6). But Abraham asked them to request Ephron, who, to judge from the expression “his city” in Gen 23:10, was then ruler of the city, to give him for a possession the cave of Machpelah , at the end of his field, of which he was the owner, “for full silver,” i.
e. , for its full worth. Ephron thereupon offered to make him a present of both field and cave. This was a turn in the affair which is still customary in the East; the design, so far as it is seriously meant at all, being either to obtain a present in return which will abundantly compensate for the value of the gift, or, what is still more frequently the case, to preclude any abatement in the price to be asked.
The same design is evident in the peculiar form in which Ephron stated the price, in reply to Abraham’s repeated declaration that he was determined to buy the piece of land: “a piece of land of 400 shekels of silver, what is that between me and thee” (Gen 23:15)? Abraham understood it so (ישׁמע Gen 23:16), and weighed him the price demanded. The shekel of silver “current with the merchant,” i.
e. , the shekel which passed in trade as of standard weight, was 274 Parisian grains, so that the price of the piece of land was £52, 10s. ; a very considerable amount for that time.
Gen 23:3-16 He then went to the Hittites, the lords and possessors of the city and its vicinity at that time, to procure from them “a possession of a burying-place. ” The negotiations were carried on in the most formal style, in a public assembly “of the people of the land,” i. e. , of natives (Gen 23:7), in the gate of the city (Gen 23:10). As a foreigner and sojourner, Abraham presented his request in the most courteous manner to all the citizens (“all that went in at the gate,” Gen 23:10, Gen 23:18; a phrase interchangeable with “all that went out at the gate,” Gen 34:24, and those who “go out and in,” Jer 17:19).
The citizens with the greatest readiness and respect offered “the prince of God,” i. e. , the man exalted by God to the rank of a prince, “the choice” (מבחר, i. e. , the most select) of their graves for his use (Gen 23:6). But Abraham asked them to request Ephron, who, to judge from the expression “his city” in Gen 23:10, was then ruler of the city, to give him for a possession the cave of Machpelah , at the end of his field, of which he was the owner, “for full silver,” i.
e. , for its full worth. Ephron thereupon offered to make him a present of both field and cave. This was a turn in the affair which is still customary in the East; the design, so far as it is seriously meant at all, being either to obtain a present in return which will abundantly compensate for the value of the gift, or, what is still more frequently the case, to preclude any abatement in the price to be asked.
The same design is evident in the peculiar form in which Ephron stated the price, in reply to Abraham’s repeated declaration that he was determined to buy the piece of land: “a piece of land of 400 shekels of silver, what is that between me and thee” (Gen 23:15)? Abraham understood it so (ישׁמע Gen 23:16), and weighed him the price demanded. The shekel of silver “current with the merchant,” i.
e. , the shekel which passed in trade as of standard weight, was 274 Parisian grains, so that the price of the piece of land was £52, 10s. ; a very considerable amount for that time.
Gen 23:3-16 He then went to the Hittites, the lords and possessors of the city and its vicinity at that time, to procure from them “a possession of a burying-place. ” The negotiations were carried on in the most formal style, in a public assembly “of the people of the land,” i. e. , of natives (Gen 23:7), in the gate of the city (Gen 23:10). As a foreigner and sojourner, Abraham presented his request in the most courteous manner to all the citizens (“all that went in at the gate,” Gen 23:10, Gen 23:18; a phrase interchangeable with “all that went out at the gate,” Gen 34:24, and those who “go out and in,” Jer 17:19).
The citizens with the greatest readiness and respect offered “the prince of God,” i. e. , the man exalted by God to the rank of a prince, “the choice” (מבחר, i. e. , the most select) of their graves for his use (Gen 23:6). But Abraham asked them to request Ephron, who, to judge from the expression “his city” in Gen 23:10, was then ruler of the city, to give him for a possession the cave of Machpelah , at the end of his field, of which he was the owner, “for full silver,” i.
e. , for its full worth. Ephron thereupon offered to make him a present of both field and cave. This was a turn in the affair which is still customary in the East; the design, so far as it is seriously meant at all, being either to obtain a present in return which will abundantly compensate for the value of the gift, or, what is still more frequently the case, to preclude any abatement in the price to be asked.
The same design is evident in the peculiar form in which Ephron stated the price, in reply to Abraham’s repeated declaration that he was determined to buy the piece of land: “a piece of land of 400 shekels of silver, what is that between me and thee” (Gen 23:15)? Abraham understood it so (ישׁמע Gen 23:16), and weighed him the price demanded. The shekel of silver “current with the merchant,” i.
e. , the shekel which passed in trade as of standard weight, was 274 Parisian grains, so that the price of the piece of land was £52, 10s. ; a very considerable amount for that time.
Gen 23:3-16 He then went to the Hittites, the lords and possessors of the city and its vicinity at that time, to procure from them “a possession of a burying-place. ” The negotiations were carried on in the most formal style, in a public assembly “of the people of the land,” i. e. , of natives (Gen 23:7), in the gate of the city (Gen 23:10). As a foreigner and sojourner, Abraham presented his request in the most courteous manner to all the citizens (“all that went in at the gate,” Gen 23:10, Gen 23:18; a phrase interchangeable with “all that went out at the gate,” Gen 34:24, and those who “go out and in,” Jer 17:19).
The citizens with the greatest readiness and respect offered “the prince of God,” i. e. , the man exalted by God to the rank of a prince, “the choice” (מבחר, i. e. , the most select) of their graves for his use (Gen 23:6). But Abraham asked them to request Ephron, who, to judge from the expression “his city” in Gen 23:10, was then ruler of the city, to give him for a possession the cave of Machpelah , at the end of his field, of which he was the owner, “for full silver,” i.
e. , for its full worth. Ephron thereupon offered to make him a present of both field and cave. This was a turn in the affair which is still customary in the East; the design, so far as it is seriously meant at all, being either to obtain a present in return which will abundantly compensate for the value of the gift, or, what is still more frequently the case, to preclude any abatement in the price to be asked.
The same design is evident in the peculiar form in which Ephron stated the price, in reply to Abraham’s repeated declaration that he was determined to buy the piece of land: “a piece of land of 400 shekels of silver, what is that between me and thee” (Gen 23:15)? Abraham understood it so (ישׁמע Gen 23:16), and weighed him the price demanded. The shekel of silver “current with the merchant,” i.
e. , the shekel which passed in trade as of standard weight, was 274 Parisian grains, so that the price of the piece of land was £52, 10s. ; a very considerable amount for that time.
Gen 23:3-16 He then went to the Hittites, the lords and possessors of the city and its vicinity at that time, to procure from them “a possession of a burying-place. ” The negotiations were carried on in the most formal style, in a public assembly “of the people of the land,” i. e. , of natives (Gen 23:7), in the gate of the city (Gen 23:10). As a foreigner and sojourner, Abraham presented his request in the most courteous manner to all the citizens (“all that went in at the gate,” Gen 23:10, Gen 23:18; a phrase interchangeable with “all that went out at the gate,” Gen 34:24, and those who “go out and in,” Jer 17:19).
The citizens with the greatest readiness and respect offered “the prince of God,” i. e. , the man exalted by God to the rank of a prince, “the choice” (מבחר, i. e. , the most select) of their graves for his use (Gen 23:6). But Abraham asked them to request Ephron, who, to judge from the expression “his city” in Gen 23:10, was then ruler of the city, to give him for a possession the cave of Machpelah , at the end of his field, of which he was the owner, “for full silver,” i.
e. , for its full worth. Ephron thereupon offered to make him a present of both field and cave. This was a turn in the affair which is still customary in the East; the design, so far as it is seriously meant at all, being either to obtain a present in return which will abundantly compensate for the value of the gift, or, what is still more frequently the case, to preclude any abatement in the price to be asked.
The same design is evident in the peculiar form in which Ephron stated the price, in reply to Abraham’s repeated declaration that he was determined to buy the piece of land: “a piece of land of 400 shekels of silver, what is that between me and thee” (Gen 23:15)? Abraham understood it so (ישׁמע Gen 23:16), and weighed him the price demanded. The shekel of silver “current with the merchant,” i.
e. , the shekel which passed in trade as of standard weight, was 274 Parisian grains, so that the price of the piece of land was £52, 10s. ; a very considerable amount for that time.
Gen 23:3-16 He then went to the Hittites, the lords and possessors of the city and its vicinity at that time, to procure from them “a possession of a burying-place. ” The negotiations were carried on in the most formal style, in a public assembly “of the people of the land,” i. e. , of natives (Gen 23:7), in the gate of the city (Gen 23:10). As a foreigner and sojourner, Abraham presented his request in the most courteous manner to all the citizens (“all that went in at the gate,” Gen 23:10, Gen 23:18; a phrase interchangeable with “all that went out at the gate,” Gen 34:24, and those who “go out and in,” Jer 17:19).
The citizens with the greatest readiness and respect offered “the prince of God,” i. e. , the man exalted by God to the rank of a prince, “the choice” (מבחר, i. e. , the most select) of their graves for his use (Gen 23:6). But Abraham asked them to request Ephron, who, to judge from the expression “his city” in Gen 23:10, was then ruler of the city, to give him for a possession the cave of Machpelah , at the end of his field, of which he was the owner, “for full silver,” i.
e. , for its full worth. Ephron thereupon offered to make him a present of both field and cave. This was a turn in the affair which is still customary in the East; the design, so far as it is seriously meant at all, being either to obtain a present in return which will abundantly compensate for the value of the gift, or, what is still more frequently the case, to preclude any abatement in the price to be asked.
The same design is evident in the peculiar form in which Ephron stated the price, in reply to Abraham’s repeated declaration that he was determined to buy the piece of land: “a piece of land of 400 shekels of silver, what is that between me and thee” (Gen 23:15)? Abraham understood it so (ישׁמע Gen 23:16), and weighed him the price demanded. The shekel of silver “current with the merchant,” i.
e. , the shekel which passed in trade as of standard weight, was 274 Parisian grains, so that the price of the piece of land was £52, 10s. ; a very considerable amount for that time.
Gen 23:3-16 He then went to the Hittites, the lords and possessors of the city and its vicinity at that time, to procure from them “a possession of a burying-place. ” The negotiations were carried on in the most formal style, in a public assembly “of the people of the land,” i. e. , of natives (Gen 23:7), in the gate of the city (Gen 23:10). As a foreigner and sojourner, Abraham presented his request in the most courteous manner to all the citizens (“all that went in at the gate,” Gen 23:10, Gen 23:18; a phrase interchangeable with “all that went out at the gate,” Gen 34:24, and those who “go out and in,” Jer 17:19).
The citizens with the greatest readiness and respect offered “the prince of God,” i. e. , the man exalted by God to the rank of a prince, “the choice” (מבחר, i. e. , the most select) of their graves for his use (Gen 23:6). But Abraham asked them to request Ephron, who, to judge from the expression “his city” in Gen 23:10, was then ruler of the city, to give him for a possession the cave of Machpelah , at the end of his field, of which he was the owner, “for full silver,” i.
e. , for its full worth. Ephron thereupon offered to make him a present of both field and cave. This was a turn in the affair which is still customary in the East; the design, so far as it is seriously meant at all, being either to obtain a present in return which will abundantly compensate for the value of the gift, or, what is still more frequently the case, to preclude any abatement in the price to be asked.
The same design is evident in the peculiar form in which Ephron stated the price, in reply to Abraham’s repeated declaration that he was determined to buy the piece of land: “a piece of land of 400 shekels of silver, what is that between me and thee” (Gen 23:15)? Abraham understood it so (ישׁמע Gen 23:16), and weighed him the price demanded. The shekel of silver “current with the merchant,” i.
e. , the shekel which passed in trade as of standard weight, was 274 Parisian grains, so that the price of the piece of land was £52, 10s. ; a very considerable amount for that time.
Gen 23:3-16 He then went to the Hittites, the lords and possessors of the city and its vicinity at that time, to procure from them “a possession of a burying-place. ” The negotiations were carried on in the most formal style, in a public assembly “of the people of the land,” i. e. , of natives (Gen 23:7), in the gate of the city (Gen 23:10). As a foreigner and sojourner, Abraham presented his request in the most courteous manner to all the citizens (“all that went in at the gate,” Gen 23:10, Gen 23:18; a phrase interchangeable with “all that went out at the gate,” Gen 34:24, and those who “go out and in,” Jer 17:19).
The citizens with the greatest readiness and respect offered “the prince of God,” i. e. , the man exalted by God to the rank of a prince, “the choice” (מבחר, i. e. , the most select) of their graves for his use (Gen 23:6). But Abraham asked them to request Ephron, who, to judge from the expression “his city” in Gen 23:10, was then ruler of the city, to give him for a possession the cave of Machpelah , at the end of his field, of which he was the owner, “for full silver,” i.
e. , for its full worth. Ephron thereupon offered to make him a present of both field and cave. This was a turn in the affair which is still customary in the East; the design, so far as it is seriously meant at all, being either to obtain a present in return which will abundantly compensate for the value of the gift, or, what is still more frequently the case, to preclude any abatement in the price to be asked.
The same design is evident in the peculiar form in which Ephron stated the price, in reply to Abraham’s repeated declaration that he was determined to buy the piece of land: “a piece of land of 400 shekels of silver, what is that between me and thee” (Gen 23:15)? Abraham understood it so (ישׁמע Gen 23:16), and weighed him the price demanded. The shekel of silver “current with the merchant,” i.
e. , the shekel which passed in trade as of standard weight, was 274 Parisian grains, so that the price of the piece of land was £52, 10s. ; a very considerable amount for that time.
Gen 23:3-16 He then went to the Hittites, the lords and possessors of the city and its vicinity at that time, to procure from them “a possession of a burying-place. ” The negotiations were carried on in the most formal style, in a public assembly “of the people of the land,” i. e. , of natives (Gen 23:7), in the gate of the city (Gen 23:10). As a foreigner and sojourner, Abraham presented his request in the most courteous manner to all the citizens (“all that went in at the gate,” Gen 23:10, Gen 23:18; a phrase interchangeable with “all that went out at the gate,” Gen 34:24, and those who “go out and in,” Jer 17:19).
The citizens with the greatest readiness and respect offered “the prince of God,” i. e. , the man exalted by God to the rank of a prince, “the choice” (מבחר, i. e. , the most select) of their graves for his use (Gen 23:6). But Abraham asked them to request Ephron, who, to judge from the expression “his city” in Gen 23:10, was then ruler of the city, to give him for a possession the cave of Machpelah , at the end of his field, of which he was the owner, “for full silver,” i.
e. , for its full worth. Ephron thereupon offered to make him a present of both field and cave. This was a turn in the affair which is still customary in the East; the design, so far as it is seriously meant at all, being either to obtain a present in return which will abundantly compensate for the value of the gift, or, what is still more frequently the case, to preclude any abatement in the price to be asked.
The same design is evident in the peculiar form in which Ephron stated the price, in reply to Abraham’s repeated declaration that he was determined to buy the piece of land: “a piece of land of 400 shekels of silver, what is that between me and thee” (Gen 23:15)? Abraham understood it so (ישׁמע Gen 23:16), and weighed him the price demanded. The shekel of silver “current with the merchant,” i.
e. , the shekel which passed in trade as of standard weight, was 274 Parisian grains, so that the price of the piece of land was £52, 10s. ; a very considerable amount for that time.
Gen 23:3-16 He then went to the Hittites, the lords and possessors of the city and its vicinity at that time, to procure from them “a possession of a burying-place. ” The negotiations were carried on in the most formal style, in a public assembly “of the people of the land,” i. e. , of natives (Gen 23:7), in the gate of the city (Gen 23:10). As a foreigner and sojourner, Abraham presented his request in the most courteous manner to all the citizens (“all that went in at the gate,” Gen 23:10, Gen 23:18; a phrase interchangeable with “all that went out at the gate,” Gen 34:24, and those who “go out and in,” Jer 17:19).
The citizens with the greatest readiness and respect offered “the prince of God,” i. e. , the man exalted by God to the rank of a prince, “the choice” (מבחר, i. e. , the most select) of their graves for his use (Gen 23:6). But Abraham asked them to request Ephron, who, to judge from the expression “his city” in Gen 23:10, was then ruler of the city, to give him for a possession the cave of Machpelah , at the end of his field, of which he was the owner, “for full silver,” i.
e. , for its full worth. Ephron thereupon offered to make him a present of both field and cave. This was a turn in the affair which is still customary in the East; the design, so far as it is seriously meant at all, being either to obtain a present in return which will abundantly compensate for the value of the gift, or, what is still more frequently the case, to preclude any abatement in the price to be asked.
The same design is evident in the peculiar form in which Ephron stated the price, in reply to Abraham’s repeated declaration that he was determined to buy the piece of land: “a piece of land of 400 shekels of silver, what is that between me and thee” (Gen 23:15)? Abraham understood it so (ישׁמע Gen 23:16), and weighed him the price demanded. The shekel of silver “current with the merchant,” i.
e. , the shekel which passed in trade as of standard weight, was 274 Parisian grains, so that the price of the piece of land was £52, 10s. ; a very considerable amount for that time.
Gen 23:3-16 He then went to the Hittites, the lords and possessors of the city and its vicinity at that time, to procure from them “a possession of a burying-place. ” The negotiations were carried on in the most formal style, in a public assembly “of the people of the land,” i. e. , of natives (Gen 23:7), in the gate of the city (Gen 23:10). As a foreigner and sojourner, Abraham presented his request in the most courteous manner to all the citizens (“all that went in at the gate,” Gen 23:10, Gen 23:18; a phrase interchangeable with “all that went out at the gate,” Gen 34:24, and those who “go out and in,” Jer 17:19).
The citizens with the greatest readiness and respect offered “the prince of God,” i. e. , the man exalted by God to the rank of a prince, “the choice” (מבחר, i. e. , the most select) of their graves for his use (Gen 23:6). But Abraham asked them to request Ephron, who, to judge from the expression “his city” in Gen 23:10, was then ruler of the city, to give him for a possession the cave of Machpelah , at the end of his field, of which he was the owner, “for full silver,” i.
e. , for its full worth. Ephron thereupon offered to make him a present of both field and cave. This was a turn in the affair which is still customary in the East; the design, so far as it is seriously meant at all, being either to obtain a present in return which will abundantly compensate for the value of the gift, or, what is still more frequently the case, to preclude any abatement in the price to be asked.
The same design is evident in the peculiar form in which Ephron stated the price, in reply to Abraham’s repeated declaration that he was determined to buy the piece of land: “a piece of land of 400 shekels of silver, what is that between me and thee” (Gen 23:15)? Abraham understood it so (ישׁמע Gen 23:16), and weighed him the price demanded. The shekel of silver “current with the merchant,” i.
e. , the shekel which passed in trade as of standard weight, was 274 Parisian grains, so that the price of the piece of land was £52, 10s. ; a very considerable amount for that time.
Gen 23:3-16 He then went to the Hittites, the lords and possessors of the city and its vicinity at that time, to procure from them “a possession of a burying-place. ” The negotiations were carried on in the most formal style, in a public assembly “of the people of the land,” i. e. , of natives (Gen 23:7), in the gate of the city (Gen 23:10). As a foreigner and sojourner, Abraham presented his request in the most courteous manner to all the citizens (“all that went in at the gate,” Gen 23:10, Gen 23:18; a phrase interchangeable with “all that went out at the gate,” Gen 34:24, and those who “go out and in,” Jer 17:19).
The citizens with the greatest readiness and respect offered “the prince of God,” i. e. , the man exalted by God to the rank of a prince, “the choice” (מבחר, i. e. , the most select) of their graves for his use (Gen 23:6). But Abraham asked them to request Ephron, who, to judge from the expression “his city” in Gen 23:10, was then ruler of the city, to give him for a possession the cave of Machpelah , at the end of his field, of which he was the owner, “for full silver,” i.
e. , for its full worth. Ephron thereupon offered to make him a present of both field and cave. This was a turn in the affair which is still customary in the East; the design, so far as it is seriously meant at all, being either to obtain a present in return which will abundantly compensate for the value of the gift, or, what is still more frequently the case, to preclude any abatement in the price to be asked.
The same design is evident in the peculiar form in which Ephron stated the price, in reply to Abraham’s repeated declaration that he was determined to buy the piece of land: “a piece of land of 400 shekels of silver, what is that between me and thee” (Gen 23:15)? Abraham understood it so (ישׁמע Gen 23:16), and weighed him the price demanded. The shekel of silver “current with the merchant,” i.
e. , the shekel which passed in trade as of standard weight, was 274 Parisian grains, so that the price of the piece of land was £52, 10s. ; a very considerable amount for that time.
Gen 23:3-16 He then went to the Hittites, the lords and possessors of the city and its vicinity at that time, to procure from them “a possession of a burying-place. ” The negotiations were carried on in the most formal style, in a public assembly “of the people of the land,” i. e. , of natives (Gen 23:7), in the gate of the city (Gen 23:10). As a foreigner and sojourner, Abraham presented his request in the most courteous manner to all the citizens (“all that went in at the gate,” Gen 23:10, Gen 23:18; a phrase interchangeable with “all that went out at the gate,” Gen 34:24, and those who “go out and in,” Jer 17:19).
The citizens with the greatest readiness and respect offered “the prince of God,” i. e. , the man exalted by God to the rank of a prince, “the choice” (מבחר, i. e. , the most select) of their graves for his use (Gen 23:6). But Abraham asked them to request Ephron, who, to judge from the expression “his city” in Gen 23:10, was then ruler of the city, to give him for a possession the cave of Machpelah , at the end of his field, of which he was the owner, “for full silver,” i.
e. , for its full worth. Ephron thereupon offered to make him a present of both field and cave. This was a turn in the affair which is still customary in the East; the design, so far as it is seriously meant at all, being either to obtain a present in return which will abundantly compensate for the value of the gift, or, what is still more frequently the case, to preclude any abatement in the price to be asked.
The same design is evident in the peculiar form in which Ephron stated the price, in reply to Abraham’s repeated declaration that he was determined to buy the piece of land: “a piece of land of 400 shekels of silver, what is that between me and thee” (Gen 23:15)? Abraham understood it so (ישׁמע Gen 23:16), and weighed him the price demanded. The shekel of silver “current with the merchant,” i.
e. , the shekel which passed in trade as of standard weight, was 274 Parisian grains, so that the price of the piece of land was £52, 10s. ; a very considerable amount for that time.
Gen 23:3-16 He then went to the Hittites, the lords and possessors of the city and its vicinity at that time, to procure from them “a possession of a burying-place. ” The negotiations were carried on in the most formal style, in a public assembly “of the people of the land,” i. e. , of natives (Gen 23:7), in the gate of the city (Gen 23:10). As a foreigner and sojourner, Abraham presented his request in the most courteous manner to all the citizens (“all that went in at the gate,” Gen 23:10, Gen 23:18; a phrase interchangeable with “all that went out at the gate,” Gen 34:24, and those who “go out and in,” Jer 17:19).
The citizens with the greatest readiness and respect offered “the prince of God,” i. e. , the man exalted by God to the rank of a prince, “the choice” (מבחר, i. e. , the most select) of their graves for his use (Gen 23:6). But Abraham asked them to request Ephron, who, to judge from the expression “his city” in Gen 23:10, was then ruler of the city, to give him for a possession the cave of Machpelah , at the end of his field, of which he was the owner, “for full silver,” i.
e. , for its full worth. Ephron thereupon offered to make him a present of both field and cave. This was a turn in the affair which is still customary in the East; the design, so far as it is seriously meant at all, being either to obtain a present in return which will abundantly compensate for the value of the gift, or, what is still more frequently the case, to preclude any abatement in the price to be asked.
The same design is evident in the peculiar form in which Ephron stated the price, in reply to Abraham’s repeated declaration that he was determined to buy the piece of land: “a piece of land of 400 shekels of silver, what is that between me and thee” (Gen 23:15)? Abraham understood it so (ישׁמע Gen 23:16), and weighed him the price demanded. The shekel of silver “current with the merchant,” i.
e. , the shekel which passed in trade as of standard weight, was 274 Parisian grains, so that the price of the piece of land was £52, 10s. ; a very considerable amount for that time.
Gen 23:17-19 “ Thus arose (ויּקם) the field... to Abraham for a possession; ” i. e. , it was conveyed to him in all due legal form. The expression “the field of Ephron which is at Machpelah” may be explained, according to Gen 23:9, from the fact that the cave of Machpelah was at the end of the field, the field, therefore, belonged to it. In Gen 23:19 the shorter form, “cave of Machpelah,” occurs; and in Gen 23:20 the field is distinguished from the cave.
The name Machpelah is translated by the lxx as a common noun, τὸ σπήλαιον τὸ διπλοῦν, from מכפּלה doubling; but it had evidently grown into a proper name, since it is sued not only of the cave, but of the adjoining field also (Gen 49:30; Gen 50:13), though it undoubtedly originated in the form of the cave. The cave was before, i. e. , probably to the east of, the grove of Mamre, which was in the district of Hebron.
This description cannot be reconciled with the tradition, which identifies Mamre and the cave with Ramet el Khalil , where the strong foundation-walls of an ancient heathen temple (according to Rosenmüller’s conjecture, an Idumaean one) are still pointed out as Abraham’s house, and where a very old terebinth stood in the early Christian times; for this is an hour’s journey to the north of modern Hebron, and even the ancient Hebron cannot have stretched so far over the mountains which separate the modern city from Rameh , but must also, according to Gen 37:14, have been situated in the valley (see Robinson’s later Biblical Researches , pp. 365ff.)
There is far greater probability in the Mohammedan tradition, that the Harem, built of colossal blocks with grooved edges, which stands on the western slope of the Beabireh mountain, in the north-western portion of the present town, contains hidden within it the cave of Machpelah with the tomb of the patriarchs (cf. Robinson, Pal. ii. 435ff.) ; and Rosen. is induced to look for Mamre on the eastern slope of the Rumeidi hill, near to the remarkable well Ain el Jedid .
Gen 23:17-19 “ Thus arose (ויּקם) the field... to Abraham for a possession; ” i. e. , it was conveyed to him in all due legal form. The expression “the field of Ephron which is at Machpelah” may be explained, according to Gen 23:9, from the fact that the cave of Machpelah was at the end of the field, the field, therefore, belonged to it. In Gen 23:19 the shorter form, “cave of Machpelah,” occurs; and in Gen 23:20 the field is distinguished from the cave.
The name Machpelah is translated by the lxx as a common noun, τὸ σπήλαιον τὸ διπλοῦν, from מכפּלה doubling; but it had evidently grown into a proper name, since it is sued not only of the cave, but of the adjoining field also (Gen 49:30; Gen 50:13), though it undoubtedly originated in the form of the cave. The cave was before, i. e. , probably to the east of, the grove of Mamre, which was in the district of Hebron.
This description cannot be reconciled with the tradition, which identifies Mamre and the cave with Ramet el Khalil , where the strong foundation-walls of an ancient heathen temple (according to Rosenmüller’s conjecture, an Idumaean one) are still pointed out as Abraham’s house, and where a very old terebinth stood in the early Christian times; for this is an hour’s journey to the north of modern Hebron, and even the ancient Hebron cannot have stretched so far over the mountains which separate the modern city from Rameh , but must also, according to Gen 37:14, have been situated in the valley (see Robinson’s later Biblical Researches , pp. 365ff.)
There is far greater probability in the Mohammedan tradition, that the Harem, built of colossal blocks with grooved edges, which stands on the western slope of the Beabireh mountain, in the north-western portion of the present town, contains hidden within it the cave of Machpelah with the tomb of the patriarchs (cf. Robinson, Pal. ii. 435ff.) ; and Rosen. is induced to look for Mamre on the eastern slope of the Rumeidi hill, near to the remarkable well Ain el Jedid .
Gen 23:17-19 “ Thus arose (ויּקם) the field... to Abraham for a possession; ” i. e. , it was conveyed to him in all due legal form. The expression “the field of Ephron which is at Machpelah” may be explained, according to Gen 23:9, from the fact that the cave of Machpelah was at the end of the field, the field, therefore, belonged to it. In Gen 23:19 the shorter form, “cave of Machpelah,” occurs; and in Gen 23:20 the field is distinguished from the cave.
The name Machpelah is translated by the lxx as a common noun, τὸ σπήλαιον τὸ διπλοῦν, from מכפּלה doubling; but it had evidently grown into a proper name, since it is sued not only of the cave, but of the adjoining field also (Gen 49:30; Gen 50:13), though it undoubtedly originated in the form of the cave. The cave was before, i. e. , probably to the east of, the grove of Mamre, which was in the district of Hebron.
This description cannot be reconciled with the tradition, which identifies Mamre and the cave with Ramet el Khalil , where the strong foundation-walls of an ancient heathen temple (according to Rosenmüller’s conjecture, an Idumaean one) are still pointed out as Abraham’s house, and where a very old terebinth stood in the early Christian times; for this is an hour’s journey to the north of modern Hebron, and even the ancient Hebron cannot have stretched so far over the mountains which separate the modern city from Rameh , but must also, according to Gen 37:14, have been situated in the valley (see Robinson’s later Biblical Researches , pp. 365ff.)
There is far greater probability in the Mohammedan tradition, that the Harem, built of colossal blocks with grooved edges, which stands on the western slope of the Beabireh mountain, in the north-western portion of the present town, contains hidden within it the cave of Machpelah with the tomb of the patriarchs (cf. Robinson, Pal. ii. 435ff.) ; and Rosen. is induced to look for Mamre on the eastern slope of the Rumeidi hill, near to the remarkable well Ain el Jedid .