Greek · G3788

ὀφθαλμός

Eye

This lexicon entry is part of our ongoing editorial review. If you notice missing content, unclear wording, or a possible correction, please send us a note through the Connect page. Screenshots are helpful.

ὀφθαλμός G3788
Pronunciation ophthalmós

What does ὀφθαλμός (ophthalmós) mean in the Bible?

Ophthalmos is the ordinary Greek noun for the eye. New Testament writers use it for the physical organ of sight, for what a person desires or attends to, and in figures of spiritual perception.

Reader summary

Full entry for ὀφθαλμός (G3788) · Open the biblical lexicon

Questions this entry answers

What does ὀφθαλμός (ophthalmós) mean in the Bible?

Ophthalmos is the ordinary Greek noun for the eye. New Testament writers use it for the physical organ of sight, for what a person desires or attends to, and in figures of spiritual perception.

How does the BSB render G3788?

The BSB source-word alignment has 100 aligned rows for this entry. Common renderings include eyes (63), eye (22), . . . (5), [the] eyes (3), an eye (2).

Where does ὀφθαλμός (ophthalmós) appear in Scripture?

The source-word alignment first shows this entry at Matthew 5:29. Its strongest book concentrations include Matthew (24), John (18), Luke (17), Revelation (10).

Are there verse guides for ὀφθαλμός (ophthalmós)?

This entry includes 1 verse guide that explain exact original-language forms in context.

What This Word Actually Means

Ophthalmos is the ordinary Greek noun for the eye. New Testament writers use it for the physical organ of sight, for what a person desires or attends to, and in figures of spiritual perception. Jesus calls the eye the body’s lamp, warns with deliberate hyperbole about an eye that becomes an occasion for sin, and heals people whose blindness is bodily and real.

Revelation promises that every eye will see the returning Christ. Luke describes the Emmaus disciples’ eyes being opened to recognize Him, while Paul prays for the eyes of the heart to be enlightened. These figurative uses do not make physical disability a moral defect, nor do they authorize superstition about vision. They show that seeing involves more than receiving images: desire, recognition, witness, and understanding all require God-governed attention.

Context must determine whether the reference is anatomical, ethical, revelatory, or metaphorical.

Sources