What does ὀργή (orgḗ) mean in the Bible?
G3709 names anger, wrath, or indignation. It can describe divine wrath, human anger, Jesus' anger in Mark 3:5, a ruler's punitive anger, or wrath treated as an expected outcome in an argument.
Wrath
Reading a lexicon entry
What this page is: Each lexicon entry shows the original Hebrew or Greek word behind the English translation: its meaning, its range of use, and where it appears in Scripture.
Strong's number: The Strong's code (H- or G-) is the standard reference number for this word. It connects this entry to chapter and passage language tabs.
Where it appears: The witness passages show where this word is used in context. Click any to open the study page for that passage.
This lexicon entry is part of our ongoing editorial review. If you notice missing content, unclear wording, or a possible correction, please send us a note through the Connect page. Screenshots are helpful.
G3709 names anger, wrath, or indignation. It can describe divine wrath, human anger, Jesus' anger in Mark 3:5, a ruler's punitive anger, or wrath treated as an expected outcome in an argument.
Reader summary
Full entry for ὀργή (G3709) · Open the biblical lexicon
G3709 names anger, wrath, or indignation. It can describe divine wrath, human anger, Jesus' anger in Mark 3:5, a ruler's punitive anger, or wrath treated as an expected outcome in an argument.
The BSB source-word alignment has 36 aligned rows for this entry. Common renderings include wrath (18), anger (8), of wrath (2), [suffer] wrath (1), [The] wrath (1).
The source-word alignment first shows this entry at Matthew 3:7. Its strongest book concentrations include Romans (12), Revelation (6), 1 Thessalonians (3), Ephesians (3).
This entry includes 1 verse guide that explain exact original-language forms in context.
G3709 names anger, wrath, or indignation. It can describe divine wrath, human anger, Jesus' anger in Mark 3:5, a ruler's punitive anger, or wrath treated as an expected outcome in an argument. Context supplies the subject, object, moral evaluation, duration, and relation to judgment. The noun does not intrinsically mean a calm or settled verdict, and it should not be defined by a rigid contrast with G2372 as though one word always meant lasting anger and the other a sudden outburst.
Divine-wrath settings include the coming wrath announced by John the Baptist, God's wrath revealed against unrighteousness in Romans 1, the day of wrath in Romans 2, salvation from wrath through Christ in Romans 5 and 1 Thessalonians, warnings in Ephesians and Colossians, oath language in Hebrews, and judgment imagery in Revelation. These passages present morally serious judgment, but the noun alone does not establish a complete doctrine of divine impassibility, atonement, election, hell, end-time sequence, or who finally receives judgment.
Human-anger settings are equally necessary. Mark 3:5 places Jesus' anger beside grief at hardened hearts and the restoration of a man's hand. Ephesians 4:31 and Colossians 3:8 call communities to put anger away within larger patterns of truthful, renewed life. First Timothy 2:8 rejects anger and disputing in prayer, and James 1:19-20 says human anger does not produce God's righteousness. Romans 12:19 directs believers away from vengeance and toward leaving judgment to God. These texts cannot be used to demand emotional numbness, punish lament, or silence truthful protest, but they do reject retaliatory and destructive anger.
Romans 1 must not be used to declare every disaster, illness, disability, social condition, or targeted group a visible object of divine wrath. Paul's argument addresses universal human unrighteousness and proceeds toward the accountability of the judging reader. It does not license harassment of LGBTQ people, anti-Jewish claims, racial hierarchy, or violence toward anyone. John 3:36 speaks within the Gospel's witness to the Son; it should not be expanded from one noun into unsupported verdicts about particular people, those without access to Christian proclamation, or the timing and mechanism of judgment.
Pastoral teaching about wrath must distinguish God's judgment from human rage and must never recruit divine authority to excuse abuse. A leader's anger is not made righteous by intensity, office, or biblical vocabulary. Threats of wrath must not be used to force conversion, compliance, donations, sexual access, secrecy, or return to danger. People facing violence, self-harm risk, or escalating anger should seek immediate safety and appropriate emergency, clinical, legal, or safeguarding help.
Thirty-six forms in thirty-four verses span divine judgment, human anger, Jesus' anger, civic punishment, rhetorical questions, calls to renounce anger, warnings about the coming wrath, and apocalyptic scenes.
He looked around at them with anger and sorrow
Anger is accompanied by grief and followed by healing. The scene does not validate every angry reaction attributed to moral concern.
The wrath of God is being revealed from heaven
The present-tense claim introduces a long argument about humanity, idolatry, judgment, and the gospel. It cannot be mapped one-to-one onto particular modern suffering.
We be saved from wrath through Him
Paul relates justification by Christ's blood to confident future salvation from wrath. The verse grounds hope in Christ rather than fear-based control by a human intermediary.
Get rid of all bitterness, rage and anger
Anger appears among practices to be removed as the community learns truthful, kind, forgiving life. The command does not require concealment of abuse or instant emotional resolution.
Jesus, who rescues us from the coming wrath
The community waits for the risen Son as rescuer. This future hope does not promise exemption from present suffering or authorize speculative dates.
The winepress of the fury of the wrath of God Almighty
Related anger terms accumulate in apocalyptic judgment imagery. Their coexistence does not prove a universal dictionary rule separating sudden from settled emotion.
BSB source-word alignment connects this entry to exact verse rows, English rendering, source form, transliteration, and parsing.
How English Renders ItA compact distribution from source-word alignment before the full evidence tables.
Verse-level guides showing how this original-language form works in its specific context, including grammar, verse function, and guarded interpretation.
Greek word. God's settled reaction against sin, distinct from momentary anger; divine justice executing judgment
Textus Receptus witness, full corpus Greek token appearances from Scrivener 1894 Textus Receptus in the full New Testament corpus.
16 of 36 Greek text appearances shown. Linked morphology labels have verse guides.
anger, wrath, passion
Read verseanger, wrath, passion
Read verseanger, wrath, passion
Read verseanger, wrath, passion
Read verseanger, wrath, passion
Read verseanger, wrath, passion
Read verseanger, wrath, passion
Read verseanger, wrath, passion
Read verseanger, wrath, passion
Read verseanger, wrath, passion
Read verseanger, wrath, passion
Read verseanger, wrath, passion
Read verseanger, wrath, passion
Read verseanger, wrath, passion
Read verseanger, wrath, passion
Read verseanger, wrath, passion
Read verseFull New Testament corpus: 260 chapters, 7,957 verses, 140,628 tokens. Data source: honza/textus-receptus (data only), with authority check against byztxt/greektext-textus-receptus.
How this word appears across different grammatical cases and numbers.
This word appears as a noun across 4 case and number patterns. The form changes show how the word functions in a sentence; they do not change the basic lexical meaning by themselves.
Selected passage-level study witnesses for this word. This section is not the full occurrence list.
Showing 5 selected witnesses from 36 lexical occurrence verses.
ὀργή is built from this root:
It highlights God’s holy response to sin and frames humanity’s need for justification. James 1:19–21
Denotes righteous divine judgment remaining upon unbelief.
Compound and idiomatic phrases that include this word. Follow a link to study the phrase and how its parts work together.
G3709 means anger or wrath, and its moral force cannot be read from the noun alone. Scripture uses it for God's judgment, Jesus' anger, human anger to be put away, civic punishment, and rhetorical argument. Romans announces wrath and also locates rescue in Christ, while Romans 12 removes vengeance from private hands. Mark joins Jesus' anger to grief and restorative action.
James denies that human anger produces God's righteousness. This breadth exposes a dangerous shortcut: leaders cannot baptize rage by calling it holy, and communities cannot use wrath texts to threaten silence or compliance. Faithful preaching tells the truth about judgment, hope, and accountability while protecting people from retaliation, discrimination, spiritual terror, and unsupported claims about their suffering.
Rom.5.9
Four singular case patterns distribute the thirty-six feminine noun tokens: fourteen genitives, ten nominatives, nine accusatives, and three datives. Case and accompanying genitives help identify relationships such as wrath of God or wrath of the Lamb, but morphology cannot prove emotional duration or moral legitimacy. G3709 and G2372 sometimes overlap or appear together; classical tendencies do not justify an absolute settled-versus-sudden rule for every New Testament passage.
Israel's Scriptures speak of divine anger, patient mercy, covenant judgment, prophetic warning, human rage, and the refusal of personal vengeance. New Testament authors inherit that theological world, sometimes through scriptural quotation. Direct equivalence among Hebrew anger terms and G3709, or a fixed psychology of divine emotion, still requires passage-specific evidence.
MorphGNT Strong's Dictionary XML — CC0 1.0 Public Domain
Open Scriptures Hebrew Bible (morphhb/OSHB) — CC BY 4.0
Open Scriptures Hebrew Lexicon — CC BY 4.0
Berean Standard Bible (BSB) source-word alignment - CC0 Public Domain