What does נָטַשׁ (nāṭaš) mean in the Bible?
This Hebrew verb can describe leaving, letting something remain or forsaking someone or something. The object and circumstances determine whether the action is ordinary, responsible or blameworthy.
Properly, to pound , i.e. smite ; by implication (as if beating out, and thus expanding) to disperse ; also, to thrust off, down, out or upon (inclusively, reject , let alone , permit , remit , etc.)
Reading a lexicon entry
What this page is: Each lexicon entry shows the original Hebrew or Greek word behind the English translation: its meaning, its range of use, and where it appears in Scripture.
Strong's number: The Strong's code (H- or G-) is the standard reference number for this word. It connects this entry to chapter and passage language tabs.
Where it appears: The witness passages show where this word is used in context. Click any to open the study page for that passage.
This lexicon entry is part of our ongoing editorial review. If you notice missing content, unclear wording, or a possible correction, please send us a note through theConnect page. Screenshots are helpful.
This Hebrew verb can describe leaving, letting something remain or forsaking someone or something. The object and circumstances determine whether the action is ordinary, responsible or blameworthy.
Reader summary
Full entry for נָטַשׁ (H5203) · Open the biblical lexicon
This Hebrew verb can describe leaving, letting something remain or forsaking someone or something. The object and circumstances determine whether the action is ordinary, responsible or blameworthy.
The BSB source-word alignment has 40 aligned rows for this entry. Common renderings include and spread out (2), forsake (2), He abandoned (2), left (2), abandon (1).
The source-word alignment first shows this entry at Genesis 31:28. Its strongest book concentrations include 1 Samuel (7), Isaiah (5), Jeremiah (5), Ezekiel (4).
This Hebrew verb can describe leaving, letting something remain or forsaking someone or something. The object and circumstances determine whether the action is ordinary, responsible or blameworthy. First Samuel 17:20 says David left the flock with a keeper before carrying out Jesse's instruction. Verse 22 likewise describes leaving supplies in another person's care. Eliab's later angry question about the sheep should be read beside those details rather than treated as the narrator's confirmation of neglect.
Proverbs 1:8 warns a son not to forsake his mother's teaching. Psalm 94:14 promises that the Lord will not forsake His people, while Jeremiah 12:7 uses forsaking language in a declaration of judgment upon God's house and inheritance. These passages cannot be reduced to a rule that every departure is disloyal or that divine faithfulness excludes all judgment and hardship. Read who leaves what, under which responsibility, and with which stated outcome. The verb alone cannot tell a teacher whether a present person's departure from a place or relationship is abandonment.
David's entrusted flock, Eliab's accusation, a mother's instruction, the Lord's faithfulness and a prophetic judgment declaration distinguish practical leaving from moral and covenantal claims.
So David got up early in the morning, left the flock with a keeper, loaded up, and set out as Jesse had instructed him. He reached the camp as the army was marching out to its position and shouting the battle cry.
David leaves the flock with a keeper while setting out as Jesse instructed. The named arrangement of care prevents the reader from equating this departure with simply abandoning the animals.
Now when David’s oldest brother Eliab heard him speaking to the men, his anger burned against David. “Why have you come down here?” he asked. “And with whom did you leave those few sheep in the wilderness? I know your pride and wickedness of heart—you have come down to see the battle!”
Eliab angrily questions David about the sheep and alleges pride and a wicked heart. His accusation must be weighed against the narrator's earlier statement about the keeper, rather than adopted without qualification.
Listen, my son, to your father’s instruction, and do not forsake the teaching of your mother.
The son is urged to hear his father's instruction and not forsake his mother's teaching. The surrounding appeal to wisdom and resistance to harmful enticement supplies the setting for receiving this instruction.
For the Lord will not forsake His people; He will never abandon His heritage.
The assurance that the Lord will not forsake His people appears amid appeals concerning wickedness, discipline and righteous judgment. It promises faithfulness without pretending that the people face no distress.
I have forsaken My house; I have abandoned My inheritance. I have given the beloved of My soul into the hands of her enemies.
The Lord declares that He has forsaken His house and given His beloved inheritance into enemy hands. The judgment language must retain its force and stated covenant setting without becoming a claim that every suffering person has been rejected.
BSB source-word alignment connects this entry to exact verse rows, English rendering, source form, transliteration, and parsing.
How English Renders ItA compact distribution from source-word alignment before the full evidence tables.
Hebrew word. To abandon or leave behind, often with force; frequently God's rejection of His people or covenant partner.
How the stem changes the meaning of this verb across the biblical text.
This verb appears through different tense, voice, mood, or stem patterns. Those forms help readers see how the action is presented in context.
Selected passage-level study witnesses for this word. This section is not the full occurrence list.
Showing 2 selected witnesses from 40 lexical occurrence verses.
נָטַשׁ is a primitive root - no further derivation.
Compound and idiomatic phrases that include this word. Follow a link to study the phrase and how its parts work together.
First Samuel 17:20 is easy to pass over on the way to the battle, but its detail matters: David leaves the flock with a keeper and follows his father's instruction. Eliab later challenges him about the sheep and claims to know his motives. Responsible teaching should not let the more forceful accusation erase what the narrator has already supplied. Leaving a task in another person's care is different from leaving it uncared for.
The verb also carries weight in promises and warnings concerning God and His people. Psalm 94's assurance of faithfulness must be read alongside its acknowledgment of trouble, while Jeremiah's judgment declaration should not be emptied of seriousness. Hebrews 13:5 gives Christian hearers confidence in God's presence without promising a life free from loss. Application should encourage trustworthy care and reliance on God while resisting the use of abandonment language to force a person to remain exposed to harm.
1Sam.17.20
Leaving can describe a responsible transfer of care, the rejection of instruction or a grave relational action. The bare verb does not decide among these. Its subject, object, circumstances and speaker must be read before assigning praise or blame.
Hebrews 13:5 cites God's promise not to leave or forsake His people within teaching about contentment and trust. Romans 11:1-2 explicitly rejects the claim that God has rejected His people. These canonical witnesses support confidence in divine faithfulness without erasing prophetic judgment passages or turning every human departure into covenant betrayal.