Hebrew · H2145

זָכָר

Properly, remembered , i.e. a male (of man or animals, as being the most noteworthy sex)

This lexicon entry is part of our ongoing editorial review. If you notice missing content, unclear wording, or a possible correction, please send us a note through theConnect page. Screenshots are helpful.

זָכָרH2145
Pronunciationzākār

What does זָכָר (zākār) mean in the Bible?

The Hebrew term zākār identifies someone or something as male. Scripture applies it to human beings and animals, and the surrounding passage determines whether the concern is creation, household membership, genealogy, circumcision, sacrifice, preservation of living creatures, or another concrete setting.

Reader summary

Full entry for זָכָר (H2145) · Open the biblical lexicon

Questions this entry answers

What does זָכָר (zākār) mean in the Bible?

The Hebrew term zākār identifies someone or something as male. Scripture applies it to human beings and animals, and the surrounding passage determines whether the concern is creation, household membership, genealogy, circumcision, sacrifice, preservation of living creatures, or another concrete setting.

How does the BSB render H2145?

The BSB source-word alignment has 82 aligned rows for this entry. Common renderings include male (32), men (13), a man (6), the males (4), a male (3).

Where does זָכָר (zākār) appear in Scripture?

The source-word alignment first shows this entry at Genesis 1:27. Its strongest book concentrations include Leviticus (18), Numbers (18), Genesis (14), Ezra (12).

What This Word Actually Means

The Hebrew term zākār identifies someone or something as male. Scripture applies it to human beings and animals, and the surrounding passage determines whether the concern is creation, household membership, genealogy, circumcision, sacrifice, preservation of living creatures, or another concrete setting. Genesis 1 places male and female together under God’s creative act and the shared gift of his image; the term marks a real distinction without assigning greater human worth to one sex.

Other texts identify male animals for sacrifice or count males for particular covenant and communal responsibilities. Because an older source gloss attached a claim about males being more noteworthy, responsible teaching must reject that value judgment as neither the public gloss nor a conclusion established by the cited passages. The word names male identity; it does not by itself supply an entire theology of embodiment, vocation, authority, or dignity.

Sources