Greek · G4550

σαπρός

Rotten

This lexicon entry is part of our ongoing editorial review. If you notice missing content, unclear wording, or a possible correction, please send us a note through theConnect page. Screenshots are helpful.

σαπρόςG4550
Pronunciationsaprós

What does σαπρός (saprós) mean in the Bible?

The Greek adjective sapros describes something rotten, spoiled, bad, or unfit for its intended use. Jesus applies it to trees and fruit when teaching that fruit discloses the character of a source, and to unwanted fish sorted from a catch in a kingdom parable.

Reader summary

Full entry for σαπρός (G4550) · Open the biblical lexicon

Questions this entry answers

What does σαπρός (saprós) mean in the Bible?

The Greek adjective sapros describes something rotten, spoiled, bad, or unfit for its intended use. Jesus applies it to trees and fruit when teaching that fruit discloses the character of a source, and to unwanted fish sorted from a catch in a kingdom parable.

How does the BSB render G4550?

The BSB source-word alignment has 8 aligned rows for this entry. Common renderings include bad (3), [a] bad (1), [and a] bad (1), [will be] bad (1), a bad (1).

Where does σαπρός (saprós) appear in Scripture?

The source-word alignment first shows this entry at Matthew 7:17. Its strongest book concentrations include Matthew (5), Luke (2), Ephesians (1).

What This Word Actually Means

The Greek adjective sapros describes something rotten, spoiled, bad, or unfit for its intended use. Jesus applies it to trees and fruit when teaching that fruit discloses the character of a source, and to unwanted fish sorted from a catch in a kingdom parable. Paul applies it to speech that fails to build a person in need or give grace to hearers. The adjective evaluates fruit, fish, or words within specific comparisons; it is not a license to call a human body, disabled person, ethnic group, abuse survivor, or disliked opponent rotten.

Responsible teaching identifies the noun modified, the contrast used, and the outcome the passage names. It examines patterns of conduct and the effect of speech without claiming flawless people or instantaneous diagnosis. It must not turn metaphor into dehumanization, confuse decay with moral guilt, weaponize final-judgment imagery, or excuse humiliation as truth-telling.

Sources