What does αἷμα (haîma) mean in the Bible?
Αἷμα is the ordinary Greek noun for blood. In the New Testament it can name physical blood, violent death, shared human descent, the blood of witnesses, sacrificial blood, and the blood of Jesus.
Blood
Reading a lexicon entry
What this page is: Each lexicon entry shows the original Hebrew or Greek word behind the English translation: its meaning, its range of use, and where it appears in Scripture.
Strong's number: The Strong's code (H- or G-) is the standard reference number for this word. It connects this entry to chapter and passage language tabs.
Where it appears: The witness passages show where this word is used in context. Click any to open the study page for that passage.
This lexicon entry is part of our ongoing editorial review. If you notice missing content, unclear wording, or a possible correction, please send us a note through the Connect page. Screenshots are helpful.
Αἷμα is the ordinary Greek noun for blood. In the New Testament it can name physical blood, violent death, shared human descent, the blood of witnesses, sacrificial blood, and the blood of Jesus.
Reader summary
Full entry for αἷμα (G129) · Open the biblical lexicon
Αἷμα is the ordinary Greek noun for blood. In the New Testament it can name physical blood, violent death, shared human descent, the blood of witnesses, sacrificial blood, and the blood of Jesus.
The BSB source-word alignment has 97 aligned rows for this entry. Common renderings include blood (75), [the] blood (5), of Blood (4), bleeding (2), from bleeding (2).
The source-word alignment first shows this entry at Matthew 16:17. Its strongest book concentrations include Hebrews (21), Revelation (19), Acts (11), Matthew (11).
This entry includes 4 verse guides that explain exact original-language forms in context.
Αἷμα is the ordinary Greek noun for blood. In the New Testament it can name physical blood, violent death, shared human descent, the blood of witnesses, sacrificial blood, and the blood of Jesus. The noun itself does not mean atonement; particular passages give Christ's blood its covenantal, sacrificial, cleansing, redemptive, or victory-bearing significance.
Leviticus 17:11 supplies essential scriptural background by joining blood, life, altar, and atonement. Hebrews 9:22 carefully says that under the law nearly everything is cleansed with blood and that forgiveness does not occur without bloodshed. The surrounding argument then contrasts repeated animal offerings with Christ's self-offering and its effect on the conscience. These passages warrant strong sacrificial claims while their qualifications should remain visible.
Matthew 26:28 identifies the cup with Jesus' covenant blood poured out for many for forgiveness. Romans 3:25 presents Christ in relation to his blood, faith, atonement, and the demonstration of God's righteousness. Ephesians 1:7 speaks of redemption and forgiveness in Christ's blood. Revelation 1:5 praises Jesus as the ruler who frees his people from sins by his blood. Each passage contributes to a canonical account of Christ's death, but the lexical entry should not force every use of αἷμα into one atonement model or treat the noun alone as proof of a complete theory.
The local New Testament index currently counts about 97 uses. The word retains its ordinary physical sense, can refer to bloodshed and human kinship, and receives particular sacrificial and covenantal significance in passages about Christ. Hebrews develops sustained contrasts between animal blood and Christ's self-offering, while Revelation speaks both of Christ's blood and the blood of faithful witnesses.
According to the law, in fact, nearly everything must be purified with blood, and without the shedding of blood there is no forgiveness.
Hebrews qualifies the claim with 'nearly everything' and locates it under the law. The verse establishes the place of bloodshed in the chapter's account of cleansing and forgiveness, while the wider argument identifies Christ's self-offering as decisive.
This is My blood of the covenant, which is poured out for many for the forgiveness of sins.
Jesus interprets the cup in relation to his covenant blood, his approaching death, and forgiveness for many. Exodus 24 supplies a covenant-blood background, but Matthew's own wording should govern the claim before broader sacramental conclusions are drawn.
God presented Him as an atoning sacrifice in His blood through faith, in order to demonstrate His righteousness, because in His forbearance He had passed over the sins committed beforehand.
Paul presents Christ in relation to hilastērion, blood, faith, and the demonstration of God's righteousness. Translation and punctuation differ over how the phrases relate, so the verse should anchor Christ's atoning death within Paul's justification argument without making one English construal carry the whole doctrine.
And from Jesus Christ, the faithful witness, the firstborn from the dead, and the ruler of the kings of the earth. To Him who loves us and has released us from our sins by His blood,
The doxology identifies Jesus as ruler of earthly kings and praises him for loving his people and freeing them from sins by his blood. The titles and saving act belong together in the sentence, but the verse does not say his blood caused him to become King.
How much more will the blood of Christ, who through the eternal Spirit offered Himself unblemished to God, purify our consciences from works of death, so that we may serve the living God!
Hebrews argues from the flesh-cleansing effect of ritual blood to the greater efficacy of Christ's self-offering through the eternal Spirit. The stated result is a cleansed conscience from dead works for service to the living God; claims about psychological mechanisms should remain subordinate to that purpose.
BSB source-word alignment connects this entry to exact verse rows, English rendering, source form, transliteration, and parsing.
How English Renders ItA compact distribution from source-word alignment before the full evidence tables.
Verse-level guides showing how this original-language form works in its specific context, including grammar, verse function, and guarded interpretation.
Greek word. blood
Textus Receptus witness, full corpus Greek token appearances from Scrivener 1894 Textus Receptus in the full New Testament corpus.
16 of 99 Greek text appearances shown. Linked morphology labels have verse guides.
blood
Read verseblood
Read verseblood
Read verseblood
Read verseblood
Read verseblood
Read verseblood
Read verseblood
Read verseblood
Read verseblood
Read verseblood
Read verseblood
Read verseblood
Read verseblood
Read verseblood
Read verseblood
Read verseFull New Testament corpus: 260 chapters, 7,957 verses, 140,628 tokens. Data source: honza/textus-receptus (data only), with authority check against byztxt/greektext-textus-receptus.
How this word appears across different grammatical cases and numbers.
This word appears as a noun across 5 case and number patterns. The form changes show how the word functions in a sentence; they do not change the basic lexical meaning by themselves.
Selected passage-level study witnesses for this word. This section is not the full occurrence list.
Showing 3 selected witnesses from 97 lexical occurrence verses.
αἷμα is of uncertain origin - no further derivation.
Expresses responsibility for rejecting the gospel.
Points to the ongoing efficacy of Christ’s atoning sacrifice in maintaining fellowship.
Compound and idiomatic phrases that include this word. Follow a link to study the phrase and how its parts work together.
Begin with the concrete reality of blood and death, then let each passage state what Christ's blood accomplishes. Matthew joins it to covenant and forgiveness; Romans 3 to God's righteous saving action received by faith; Ephesians to redemption and forgiveness; Hebrews to self-offering, cleansing, and access; Revelation to release from sins and victory through faithful witness.
That pattern keeps preaching both vivid and disciplined. The cross is a real bodily death, not a decorative symbol, yet the word blood by itself does not decide among every account of atonement. The surrounding clauses identify the agent, purpose, covenant setting, and promised effect. Teachers should therefore proclaim the full force of those claims while refusing to add a mechanism that the cited text has not supplied.
Pastorally, blood language must never be used to celebrate violence, shame victims, or imply conflict within the Trinity. The New Testament presents the Son's willing self-offering within God's saving purpose. It also honors the blood of witnesses without granting their deaths the saving efficacy Scripture attributes to Christ.
Heb.9.14
Αἷμα ordinarily names blood. Metonymic uses can refer to bloodshed, violent death, or human descent, while sacrificial and covenantal meanings arise from the passages in which blood is offered, sprinkled, poured out, or associated with forgiveness and cleansing. Theological significance should therefore be traced from syntax and context rather than inserted into every occurrence from the display gloss.
Exodus 12 places blood within Passover deliverance, Exodus 24 uses blood in covenant ratification, and Leviticus 17:11 joins blood, life, altar, and atonement. Hebrews reads the tabernacle and sacrificial system in light of Christ's self-offering, emphasizing a cleansed conscience and access to God. These connections support a rich canonical account while leaving the wording and purpose of each Old Testament rite intact.
MorphGNT Strong's Dictionary XML — CC0 1.0 Public Domain
Open Scriptures Hebrew Bible (morphhb/OSHB) — CC BY 4.0
Open Scriptures Hebrew Lexicon — CC BY 4.0
Berean Standard Bible (BSB) source-word alignment - CC0 Public Domain